Autogenic inhibition versus reciprocal inhibition for lower cross syndrome
Official title: Effects of Autogenic Inhibition Versus Reciprocal Inhibition in Individuals With Lower Cross Syndrome
Run by Foundation University Islamabad · NCT07526051 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This trial tests whether autogenic inhibition or reciprocal inhibition techniques better reduce pain and improve function in adults aged 25–50 with lower cross syndrome.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 25 Years to 50 Years |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 72 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Foundation University Islamabad Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Islamabad, Punjab Province) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | May 20, 2026 |
| Main results expected | July 1, 2026 |
| Study ends | July 15, 2026 |
| Registry record updated | May 20, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT07526051 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Ideal candidates are men and women age 25–50 with chronic (more than 2 months) low back pain and four positive screening tests consistent with lower cross syndrome.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients with conditions excluded from the trial—such as osteoporosis, inflammatory arthritis, recent fractures, congenital hip dysplasia, pregnancy—or those outside the 25–50 age range or with milder pain may not benefit from the study interventions.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
Adults with clinically identified lower cross syndrome were randomly assigned to one of two intervention groups: Group A received autogenic inhibition (proprioceptive facilitation/PNF-style) techniques aimed at lengthening chronically shortened muscles, and Group B received reciprocal inhibition techniques with the same goal. Outcomes measured before and after the intervention included pain by VAS, functional disability by the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), muscular strength using a sphygmomanometer, and lumbar and hip range of motion using inclinometer and goniometer. Participants met screening criteria including four positive clinical tests and chronic low back pain >2 months, while those with osteoporosis, inflammatory arthritis, recent fractures, congenital hip dysplasia, or pregnancy were excluded. The interventions were delivered in-person at a single center and compared to determine which technique produces greater improvements in symptoms and mobility.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, the better-performing technique could offer a simple, noninvasive way to reduce pain and improve strength and range of motion for people with lower cross syndrome.
How similar studies have gone: Previous research on PNF-style autogenic techniques and reciprocal inhibition has shown modest improvements in range of motion and pain for musculoskeletal conditions, but direct comparisons specifically in lower cross syndrome are limited.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Both Males and Females will be included in our study Age 25-50 years Four positive screening tests (Thomas Test, Abdominal Strength Test, Glutues Maximus Test, Ely's Test) chronic Pain in lower Back Region (\>3 on VAS) lasting for more than 2 months Exclusion Criteria: * Osteoporosis Congenital Hip Dysplasia History of Fracture History of Inflammatory Arthritis Pregnancy
Where it's running
-
Foundation University College of Physical Therapy
Islamabad, Punjab Province, Pakistan Recruiting
Study contacts
- Principal investigator: Zobia Noor, DPT — Foundation University Islamabad
- Study coordinator: Zobia Noor, DPT
- Email: zobianoor426@gmail.com
- Phone: 0334-8962818
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Autogenic Inhibition vs Reciprocal Inhibition in Lower Crossed Syndrome
This study tests whether two Muscle Energy Technique approaches work differently for people with Lower Crossed Syndrome.
-
Post-Isometric Relaxation and Myofascial Release for Low Back Pain with Lower Cross Syndrome
This trial tests whether combining post-isometric relaxation with myofascial release helps reduce pain and improve flexibility and function for adults with low back pain and lower cross syndrome.
-
Comparing Jandas Approach and PNF Technique for Lower Cross Syndrome
This study is testing which physical therapy method, Jandas Approach or PNF, works better for helping people with Lower Cross Syndrome feel less pain and improve their movement and quality of life.
-
Effects of lumbar mobilization techniques on lower cross syndrome
This study is testing if a specific back treatment can help people with lower cross syndrome feel less pain and move better.
-
Kendall exercises with and without positional release therapy for upper crossed syndrome
This study tests Kendall exercises with and without positional release therapy to see if they reduce neck and shoulder pain and improve posture in adults with upper crossed syndrome.
-
Breathing and manual therapy to improve function in college students with upper cross syndrome
In college students with upper cross syndrome, adding a specific breathing technique (ujjayi pranayama) to manual therapy is being tested to see if it helps spinal alignment relate to better functional performance.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.