Comparison of Non-Calibrated Splinting Scan Bodies and a T-Marker for Full-Arch Implant Scanning
Official title: Accuracy of Complete-Arch Implant Scans Obtained Using Non-Calibrated Splinting Bodies and a Mobile Phone-Based Photogrammetry System (T-Marker): A Randomized Crossover Clinical Trial
Run by Menoufia University · NCT07723404 · Data updated 2026-11-12
Researchers are testing two digital methods to record implant positions for full-arch implant-supported prostheses in fully edentulous patients to see which is faster and more accurate.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 20 Years to 60 Years |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 40 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Menoufia University Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Shibīn al Kawm, Shibin Alkom) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | April 1, 2026 |
| Main results expected | December 1, 2026 |
| Study ends | January 1, 2027 |
| Registry record updated | September 9, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT07723404 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Adults 18 years and older with complete maxillary edentulism rehabilitated with four well-integrated implants connected to multiunit abutments and needing a screw-retained prosthesis.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients with fewer than four implants, implants outside the maxillary arch, implant instability, infection, or inability to tolerate scanning may not benefit from these methods.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This randomized crossover study compares a non-calibrated splinting scan body system (IoConnect) used with an intraoral scanner to a mobile phone-based photogrammetry system (T-Marker) for capturing implant positions in four-implant, full-arch cases. Each participant will undergo both scanning methods in random order, with accuracy (trueness) measured against a verified reference model and secondary timing outcomes recorded. The trial aims to determine whether these digital workflows can provide reliable and efficient alternatives for complete-arch implant impressions. Twenty-four adults with complete maxillary edentulism and four well-integrated implants will be enrolled, with strict inclusion/exclusion criteria to ensure suitability for both techniques. The study will help inform clinical decisions in implant prosthodontics regarding feasible, patient-friendly digital impression options.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, patients could benefit from faster, equally accurate digital impression options for full-arch implant prostheses.
How similar studies have gone: Clinical evidence for direct comparison of these two digital approaches in full-arch implants has been limited, making this study relatively novel.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria * Adults aged 18 years or older. * Completely edentulous maxilla rehabilitated with four well-integrated implants connected to multiunit abutments. * Patients presenting with a screw-retained interim implant-supported prosthesis or requiring a definitive implant-supported prosthesis. * Adequate implant osseointegration with no clinical signs of implant failure. * Ability to understand the study procedures and provide written informed consent. Exclusion Criteria * Fewer than four implants supporting the maxillary prosthesis. * Implants located outside the maxillary arch. * Failed implants or implants exhibiting mobility. * Active peri-implant infection or suppuration. * Inability to tolerate intraoral scanning or comply with study procedures. * Refusal or inability to provide written informed consent.
Where it's running
-
Mohammed Elsawy
Shibīn al Kawm, Shibin Alkom, Egypt Recruiting
Study contacts
- Principal investigator: Mohammed Elsawy, PhD — Menoufia University
- Study coordinator: Mohammed A. Elsawy, PhD
- Email: mohamed.elsawy@dent.menofia.edu.eg
- Phone: 00201061314522
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Dental Abutments With Different Surfaces in Two-Unit Implant Bridges
This study tests whether two different abutment surface types affect outcomes for people needing two-implant-supported, two-unit bridges in the back of the mouth.
-
Accuracy of complete-arch implant scans with two non-calibrated splinting systems
This study compares two non-calibrated splinting methods (IoConnect vs Scan Pro) to see which one gives more accurate complete-arch implant scans and shorter chairside time in people who have four stable, integrated implants.
-
Accuracy of the Calibrated Framework for Full-Arch Implant Impressions in Edentulous Patients
This study tests whether digital scanning with a calibrated framework can match the accuracy of traditional splinted impressions for full-arch dental implants in completely toothless patients.
-
Digital jaw tracking for full-arch maxillary implant restorations
This randomized trial tests whether using digital jaw tracking to guide the fabrication of full-arch maxillary implant-supported prostheses improves occlusal accuracy and patient satisfaction compared with a conventional workflow.
-
Nutritional Support for Older Adults with Complete Dentures
A 40-person study tests a multidimensional nutritional program to see if it improves diet, nutrition, chewing, muscle health, saliva markers, cognitive performance, and oral-health quality of life in older adults who wear complete dentures.
-
Biodontoss and DWC dental implants and superstructures in adults needing tooth replacement
This PMCF study tests whether BIODENTOSS and DWC dental implants and their superstructures are safe and effective for adults with tooth loss over 24 months.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.