Whole-body vibration vs. Pilates for chronic low back pain in young adults
Official title: Effects of Whole-Body Vibraton and Pilates on Pain, Dynamic Balance, and Functional Performance in Chronic Non-Specific Low Back Pain
Run by Lahore University of Biological and Applied Sciences · NCT07719699 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This trial tests whether whole-body vibration or Pilates, each with standard physiotherapy, better reduces pain and improves balance and function in adults with chronic non-specific low back pain.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years to 40 Years |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 68 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Lahore University of Biological and Applied Sciences Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Lahore, Punjab Province) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | May 1, 2026 |
| Main results expected | July 30, 2026 |
| Study ends | September 15, 2026 |
| Registry record updated | August 26, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT07719699 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Adults aged 18–40 with chronic non-specific low back pain (pain >12 weeks, VAS 3–8, located between T12 and gluteal folds) who have not recently engaged in Pilates.
✕Probably not a fit
Individuals with prior spinal surgery, significant medical comorbidity, radicular or neurological deficits, pregnancy, or weight over 150 kg may be less likely to benefit or be excluded.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
In this randomized study, 68 adults aged 18–40 with chronic non-specific low back pain are assigned to either whole-body vibration plus conventional physiotherapy or Pilates plus conventional physiotherapy, three sessions per week for four weeks. Outcomes include pain intensity (Visual Analog Scale), dynamic balance (Y-Balance Test), and functional performance (Progressive Isoinertial Lifting Evaluation). The goal is to directly compare the two active interventions to guide rehabilitation choices for CNSLBP. The trial is conducted at Surryya Azeem Waqq hospital in Lahore, sponsored by the Lahore University of Biological and Applied Sciences. The study design ensures random allocation and standardized assessment to determine which approach yields greater benefit for pain, balance, and function.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, the findings could help clinicians choose between WBV and Pilates as a more effective component of CNSLBP rehabilitation.
How similar studies have gone: Prior studies have explored WBV and Pilates separately, but direct head-to-head comparisons in CNSLBP are limited, making this a notably focused comparison.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: 1. Male and Female (18-40 years age) 2. Pain lasting for more than 12 weeks(determined by patient history) 3. Pain scores (VAS) ranging from 3 to 8 points 4. Pain located between T12 and gluteal folds(determined via palpation) 5. Not having attended Pilates for low back pain for atleast 6 months prior to enrollment Exclusion Criteria: 1. History of spinal surgery, fractures, tumors, infections, or inflammatory spinal disease. 2. Pregnant or lactating( strongly contraindicated for whole body vibration due to potential fetal risk and pelvic instability) 3. Radicular pain, nerve root compression or neurological deficits. 4. Medical comorbidities (e.g cardiovascular, neurological, endocrine or metabolic disease)(5). 5. Physical limitations (e.g. orthopedic or rheumatic diseases, muscular injury, fibromyalgia, or pain)that could affect their ability to perform the Pilate exercises. 6. Participants whose weight exceeds 150kg ( that's the maximum weight bearing capacity for WBV)
Where it's running
-
Surraya Azeem waqf hospital
Lahore, Punjab Province, Pakistan Recruiting
Study contacts
- Study coordinator: Dr Mehwish Khalid, MSPT
- Email: mehwish.khalid@ubas.edu.pk
- Phone: 03324302282
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Exercise effect on the lumbar multifidus in back pain
This study tests whether a 12-week home rehab program can change ultrasound features of the lumbar multifidus and reduce pain in adults with chronic non-specific low back pain from multifidus injury.
-
McGill Stabilization Exercises vs Sahrmann Movement-Based Exercises for Chronic Low Back Pain
This trial tests whether McGill stabilization exercises or Sahrmann's movement-based exercises better reduce pain and improve motion and function in adults with chronic non-specific low back pain.
-
High-Intensity Interval Training vs Moderate-Intensity Continuous Training for Chronic Non-Specific Low Back Pain
This study tests whether a high-intensity interval training program helps reduce pain and improve function more than a moderate, steady-paced program in adults with chronic, non-specific low back pain.
-
Isokinetic Profile of Ankle Muscles in Chronic Non-Specific Low Back Pain Patients
This study tests how ankle muscle performance differs in men with chronic non-specific low back pain compared with typical expectations, using isokinetic testing to explore links between pain, function, and fatigue.
-
VR-MBCT for chronic nonspecific low back pain
A multi-center trial will test whether adding virtual reality-based mindfulness therapy to usual care helps adults with chronic nonspecific low back pain feel better and move more in 8 weeks.
-
Does adding Myofascial Release to Clinical Pilates help chronic low back pain more than Pilates alone?
This study tests whether adding Myofascial Release Technique to a 6-week Clinical Pilates program reduces pain and improves function in adults with chronic non-specific low back pain.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.