McGill Stabilization Exercises vs Sahrmann Movement-Based Exercises for Chronic Low Back Pain
Official title: Effects of McGill Versus Sahrmann's Protocol on Pain, Range of Motion and Disability in Chronic Non- Specific Low Back Pain
Run by Riphah International University · NCT07724704 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This trial tests whether McGill stabilization exercises or Sahrmann's movement-based exercises better reduce pain and improve motion and function in adults with chronic non-specific low back pain.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 20 Years to 50 Years |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 40 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Riphah International University Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Lahore, Punjab Province) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | July 16, 2026 |
| Main results expected | September 16, 2026 |
| Study ends | September 16, 2026 |
| Registry record updated | July 24, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT07724704 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Adults aged 20–50 with chronic non-specific low back pain for at least 12 weeks and a baseline pain 3–4 on the NPRS, willing to participate in a structured exercise program.
✕Probably not a fit
Individuals with prior spinal surgery, neurological deficits, structural deformities, red flags, or contraindications to exercise may not benefit.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This randomized, interventional study compares two exercise programs for adults with chronic non-specific low back pain lasting more than 12 weeks. Participants are assigned to either McGill stabilization exercises or Sahrmann's movement-based exercise protocol to see which approach better reduces pain, increases lumbar range of motion, and decreases disability. The trial uses standard outcome measures including pain intensity, lumbar mobility, and functional status to compare the two interventions over the treatment period. Conducted at Lahore-area clinics, the study adheres to safety and consent requirements and targets adults aged 20–50 without surgical history or red flags. The aim is to provide evidence to guide exercise-based rehabilitation for CNSLBP.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, the preferred exercise protocol could offer greater pain relief and functional improvement for people with chronic non-specific low back pain.
How similar studies have gone: Direct head-to-head comparisons of these two routines are limited, making this study a relatively novel contribution to the evidence base.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria * Adults aged 20-50 years. * Male and female participants. * Diagnosed with chronic non-specific low back pain lasting more than 12 weeks. * Pain intensity of 3-4 on the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) at baseline. * Able and willing to participate in the exercise program and attend all treatment sessions. * Willing to provide written informed consent. Exclusion Criteria * History of spinal surgery. * Presence of neurological deficits. * Structural spinal deformities. * Pregnancy or within 6 months postpartum. * Presence of red flag signs or systemic illness (e.g., fracture, infection, malignancy, inflammatory disorders). * Individuals unable or unwilling to participate in the exercise program or complete the study protocol.
Where it's running
-
Lahore Clinic Shujabad, THQ Hospital Shujabad
Lahore, Punjab Province, Pakistan Recruiting
Study contacts
- Principal investigator: Annum Manzoor, MS OMPT — Gulab Devi Teaching institute
- Study coordinator: Imran Amjad, Phd
- Email: imran.amjad@riphah.edu.pk
- Phone: 03324390125
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Exercise effect on the lumbar multifidus in back pain
This study tests whether a 12-week home rehab program can change ultrasound features of the lumbar multifidus and reduce pain in adults with chronic non-specific low back pain from multifidus injury.
-
Whole-body vibration vs. Pilates for chronic low back pain in young adults
This trial tests whether whole-body vibration or Pilates, each with standard physiotherapy, better reduces pain and improves balance and function in adults with chronic non-specific low back pain.
-
High-Intensity Interval Training vs Moderate-Intensity Continuous Training for Chronic Non-Specific Low Back Pain
This study tests whether a high-intensity interval training program helps reduce pain and improve function more than a moderate, steady-paced program in adults with chronic, non-specific low back pain.
-
Isokinetic Profile of Ankle Muscles in Chronic Non-Specific Low Back Pain Patients
This study tests how ankle muscle performance differs in men with chronic non-specific low back pain compared with typical expectations, using isokinetic testing to explore links between pain, function, and fatigue.
-
VR-MBCT for chronic nonspecific low back pain
A multi-center trial will test whether adding virtual reality-based mindfulness therapy to usual care helps adults with chronic nonspecific low back pain feel better and move more in 8 weeks.
-
Does adding Myofascial Release to Clinical Pilates help chronic low back pain more than Pilates alone?
This study tests whether adding Myofascial Release Technique to a 6-week Clinical Pilates program reduces pain and improves function in adults with chronic non-specific low back pain.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.