Wavefront-guided LASIK versus ray-tracing-guided LASIK in opposite eyes
Official title: A Prospective Randomized Comparison of Wavefront-guided LASIK Surgery to Ray Tracing-Guided LASIK Surgery
Run by Stanford University · NCT07078799 · Data updated 2026-11-12
We will try wavefront-guided LASIK in one eye and ray-tracing-guided LASIK in the other eye of adults 22 and older with nearsightedness (with up to 3 diopters of astigmatism) to see if one gives better vision outcomes.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 22 Years to 59 Years |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 70 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Stanford University Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Palo Alto, California) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | January 20, 2026 |
| Main results expected | December 31, 2027 |
| Study ends | December 31, 2027 |
| Registry record updated | January 22, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT07078799 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Adults aged 22 or older with healthy eyes, stable myopia between −1.00 and −10.00 diopters, ≤3.00 diopters of astigmatism, similar prescriptions between eyes, and who are willing to have one eye receive each procedure and attend follow-up visits.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients with excessively thin corneas, topographic evidence of keratoconus or other ectatic disorders, autoimmune disease, pregnancy or nursing, more than 3.00 D astigmatism, or >1.5 D difference between eyes are unlikely to be eligible or benefit from this comparison.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This single-center randomized comparison enrolls up to 70 adults with myopia (−1.00 to −10.00 D) and ≤3.00 D astigmatism to receive wavefront-guided LASIK in one eye and ray-tracing-guided LASIK in the fellow eye. Which eye receives which procedure is assigned at random before enrollment, and both procedures are performed according to FDA-approved labeling. Participants undergo preoperative baseline measurements and scheduled postoperative ophthalmic examinations to compare visual outcomes and safety between the two guidance methods. The within-patient design reduces variability by directly comparing both techniques in the same individual.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, the trial could identify which LASIK guidance method yields sharper vision or fewer side effects, helping patients and surgeons choose the better option.
How similar studies have gone: Both approaches are FDA-approved and wavefront-guided LASIK has extensive prior data while ray-tracing guidance is newer and direct randomized, within-patient comparisons are limited.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: 1. Age 22 and older 2. People with healthy eyes: 1. No abnormal corneal shape 2. No excessively thin corneas 3. No eye diseases such as glaucoma or cataracts 3. Nearsightedness between -1.00 diopters and -10.00 diopters. 4. Subjects with less than or equal to 3.00 diopters of astigmatism. 5. Subjects must have similar levels of nearsightedness in each eye. Exclusion Criteria: 1. Subjects under the age of 22. 2. Subjects with excessively thin corneas. 3. Subjects with topographic evidence of keratoconus. 4. Subjects with ectactic eye disorders. 5. Subjects with autoimmune diseases. 6. Subjects who are pregnant or nursing at the time of surgery. (The FDA-approved labelling indications for LASIK specifically excludes patients who are pregnant or nursing. There is no strict prohibition not to become pregnant during the one year study period) 7. They can not be more than 1.5 diopter of difference between eyes. 8. Subjects with more than 3.00 diopters of astigmatism 9. Subjects with disimilar levels of astigmatism in each eye (They can not have more than 0.75 diopters of difference between eyes) -
Where it's running
-
Byers Eye Institute at Stanford University School of Medicine
Palo Alto, California, United States Recruiting
Study contacts
- Principal investigator: Edward E Manche, MD — Stanford University
- Study coordinator: Edward E Manche, MD
- Email: cornea@stanford.edu
- Phone: 650 725 5765
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Evaluating a device for screening vision problems in young children
This study is testing a new device to see if it can effectively find vision problems in children aged 3 to 8, whether they wear glasses or not.
-
Two monthly silicone hydrogel multifocal toric contact lenses in wearers with astigmatism and myopia
This study tests whether two popular soft multifocal toric contact lenses perform differently in adults who need vision correction for astigmatism and myopia.
-
Seeing clearly in low light after Ray-Tracing guided LASIK
A trial tests how well WaveLight Plus LASIK works for people with myopia and astigmatism and whether patients are satisfied after the procedure.
-
Orthokeratology contact lenses with a 5 mm optic zone diameter
This study tests Paragon CRT lenses with a 5 mm optic zone in kids and young adults to see how well they fit, how well they vision, and how comfortable they are at night.
-
SMILE in one eye vs Ray tracing-guided LASIK in the fellow eye
This study tests two laser vision correction methods—SMILE in one eye and ray-tracing guided LASIK in the other eye—to see which provides better vision and quality of life for adults with myopia and astigmatism.
-
Comparing Ray‑Tracing Guided LASIK with three other laser vision correction methods for myopia and astigmatism
This test will compare Ray‑Tracing Guided LASIK to three other laser or lenticule refractive procedures for adults with moderate myopia, with or without astigmatism.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.