Ultra-early Identification of Futile Recanalization After Reperfusion Therapy in Acute Ischemic Stroke
Official title: Ultra-early Identification of Futile Recanalization After Reperfusion Therapy in Acute Ischemic Stroke Based on Cerebral Autoregulation Monitoring: a Multicenter, Prospective, Interventional Study
Run by Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University · NCT07747701 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This study tests whether cerebral autoregulation monitoring during thrombectomy can predict futile recanalization and bad outcomes in adults with acute ischemic stroke.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years and up |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 227 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University Academic / other |
| Locations | 4 sites (Beijing and 3 other locations) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | July 31, 2026 |
| Main results expected | January 31, 2027 |
| Study ends | February 5, 2027 |
| Registry record updated | November 9, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT07747701 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Adults (≥18) with acute ischemic stroke due to anterior circulation large vessel occlusion who have undergone mechanical thrombectomy and achieved some degree of recanalization, with pre-stroke mRS 0-1.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients with non-ischemic etiologies, poor baseline prognosis, or imaging showing extensive irreversible brain injury may not benefit from the predictive approach.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This multicenter prospective diagnostic accuracy study enrolls adults with acute ischemic stroke due to anterior circulation large vessel occlusion who undergo mechanical thrombectomy. It uses near-infrared spectroscopy–based cerebral oxygenation and blood pressure monitoring along with a carotid compression test during the procedure. Participants are followed at predefined time points up to 90 days to assess neurological outcomes and the predictive value of autoregulation monitoring for ultra-early futile recanalization. The study aims to identify patterns that may indicate limited benefit from successful recanalization, enabling more informed care decisions. No interventional treatment beyond the monitoring and standard thrombectomy is described.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, the monitoring approach could help clinicians identify patients unlikely to benefit from further aggressive recanalization efforts early in the care pathway.
How similar studies have gone: Prior research suggests autoregulation monitoring can provide prognostic information in stroke, but this specific ultra-early, post-thrombectomy predictive approach is newer and requires validation.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: 1. Age ≥ 18 2. Diagnosis of acute ischemic stroke caused by anterior circulation large vessel occlusion (intracranial internal carotid artery or M1 segment of the middle cerebral artery). 3. National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score ≥ 6 at presentation. 4. Pre-stroke modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score ≤ 1. 5. Symptom onset ≤ 24 hours. 6. For patients with symptom onset within 6 hours: ASPECTS ≥ 6; for patients with symptom onset between 6 and 24 hours: age ≤ 80 years and ASPECTS ≥ 3. 7. Underwent mechanical thrombectomy and achieved successful recanalization (mTICI 2b-3). 8. Patient or legally authorized representative provides written informed consent. Exclusion Criteria: 1. Pre-procedural baseline imaging showing significant intracranial hemorrhagic transformation, intracranial arterial dissection, large chronic cerebral infarction, or intracranial metastasis from malignant tumors. 2. Any degree of stenosis, plaque, dissection, severe tortuosity, or imaging evidence of unstable/vulnerable plaque in the target-side or bilateral common carotid artery or the origin of the internal carotid artery. 3. Known history of carotid sinus hypersensitivity syndrome, severe autonomic dysfunction, sick sinus syndrome, high-grade atrioventricular conduction block, or other malignant arrhythmias. 4. Refractory malignant hypertensive crisis (systolic blood pressure persistently ≥ 200 mmHg despite standardized intravenous antihypertensive therapy, or hemodynamic instability with shock). 5. Known severe allergy to contrast agents or anesthetic drugs, or contraindications to antiplatelet/anticoagulation therapy. 6. Severe systemic active infection, multiple organ failure, or expected survival \< 6 months. 7. Severe hepatic or renal dysfunction (ALT/AST \> 3× upper limit of normal; estimated glomerular filtration rate \< 30 mL/min) or severe coagulation disorders (platelet count \< 40 × 10⁹/L, APTT \> 50 s, INR \> 3.0). 8. Blood glucose \< 2.7 mmol/L or \> 22.2 mmol/L. 9. Heart failure with NYHA class \> II, or persistent systolic blood pressure \< 100 mmHg. 10. Central nervous system infection or intracranial tumor. 11. Unstable vital signs. 12. Severe alcohol dependence or drug dependence. 13. Cognitive impairment or psychiatric disorders that may affect follow-up assessments. 14. Pregnant or breastfeeding women. 15. Participation in another clinical drug or device study within the past 30 days. 16. Local skin damage or other conditions preventing proper placement of monitoring electrodes. 17. Severe agitation or other conditions that interfere with data acquisition. 18. Any other condition judged by investigators to potentially affect study results.
Where it's running
-
Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University
Beijing, China Recruiting -
Central Hospital of Dalian University of Technology (Dalian Municipal Central Hospital)
Dalian, China Recruiting -
The First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University
Heilongjiang, China Recruiting -
Weifang People's Hospital Affiliated to Weifang Medical University
Shandong, China Recruiting
Study contacts
- Principal investigator: Shen Li — Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University
- Study coordinator: Simeng Wang
- Email: wsm990419@163.com
- Phone: 010-63925615
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Ultra-early detection of failed recovery after stroke using cerebral autoregulation during thrombectomy
This study tests whether monitoring how the brain controls blood flow during thrombectomy can quickly show which large-vessel ischemic stroke patients are unlikely to regain function after a successful vessel reopening.
-
Short-Term outside-in nerve stimulation for acute ischemic stroke
This trial tests whether a 5-day external trigeminal nerve stimulation given after stroke can help more patients recover better than a sham treatment.
-
Sevoflurane vs. Propofol for anesthesia in stroke patients undergoing clot-removal
This study tests whether sevoflurane or propofol used for anesthesia during endovascular treatment of an acute ischemic stroke affects the final brain damage and recovery.
-
Safety of adding NRICM301 to standard care for adults with acute ischemic stroke
This study tests whether adding NRICM301, a traditional Chinese medicine formula, to usual care is safe for adults with acute ischemic stroke.
-
Intracranial Recanalization with LT3001 in Acute Ischemic Stroke
This phase II study tests whether LT3001 given to adults with acute ischemic stroke can help reopen blocked brain arteries.
-
Mobilisation After Endovascular Stroke Treatment
This study checks whether moving around 12 hours after endovascular stroke treatment is as safe as moving around 24 hours for people with an acute ischemic stroke.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.