Two Videolaryngoscopes for Intubating Children: A Pediatric Comparison
Official title: Evaluation Of Two Different Videolaryngoscopes İn A Pediatric Patient Group; Prospectus Observational Study
Run by Samsun University · NCT07837882 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This observational study tests how two different videolaryngoscopes perform during pediatric intubations to see which makes the process quicker and easier.
Quick facts
| Study type | Observational |
|---|---|
| Ages | 2 Years to 10 Years |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 60 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Samsun University Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Samsun, Mağaza Seçiniz) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | May 1, 2026 |
| Main results expected | December 30, 2026 |
| Study ends | December 31, 2026 |
| Registry record updated | September 24, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT07837882 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Children aged 2-10 years, weighing 10-40 kg, ASA I-II, scheduled for elective surgery requiring general anesthesia with intubation.
✕Probably not a fit
Children with difficult airways identified preoperatively or conditions suggesting higher risk of rapid serial intubation may not benefit from comparisons intended for routine cases.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
The study compares two videolaryngoscope devices in children undergoing elective surgery who require general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation. Outcomes include intubation time and a pediatric-specific intubation difficulty score (PeDiAC) compared to the traditional Cormack-Lehane classification. It aims to determine if there are differences in ease and safety of airway management between the Endolarenx and Besdata devices. The investigation builds on evidence that videolaryngoscopy may improve airway visualization but may alter the relationship between view quality and tube placement difficulty. No randomization is described, as this is an observational assessment of device performance in routine practice.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If one device shows clearer visualization and faster intubation, it could streamline pediatric anesthesia and reduce airway-related complications.
How similar studies have gone: Previous work supports the use of videolaryngoscopy in pediatric intubation, but head-to-head comparisons of specific devices remain limited.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * ASA I-II * 10-40 kg * 2-10 years old * Elective surgery * Requirement for intubation under general anesthesia * Expected normal airway Exclusion Criteria: * Difficult airway on preoperative assessment * Need for rapid serial intubation * History of previous difficult intubation * Cervical instability * Upper respiratory tract infection within the last 4 weeks * Neuromuscular disease * History of asthma
Where it's running
-
Samsun University
Samsun, Mağaza Seçiniz, Turkey (Türkiye) Recruiting
Study contacts
- Study coordinator: Hatice Selcuk Kuşderci
- Email: drkusderci@hotmail.com
- Phone: +905052159896
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Effect of a brief educational intervention on endotracheal tube cuff pressure
A short educational video and reminder posters are tested to see if they help operating room staff keep endotracheal tube cuff pressure within the recommended range for adult patients under general anesthesia.
-
Hyperangulated vs. Macintosh blades for obstetric intubation
This study tests whether a hyperangulated blade or a Macintosh-style blade helps obstetric patients get an endotracheal tube placement more safely during cesarean deliveries under general anesthesia.
-
Predicting difficult mask ventilation and intubation using STOP-BANG in obese adults
This study will test whether the STOP-BANG questionnaire can predict difficult mask ventilation and difficult intubation in obese adults having elective surgery.
-
Comparing oxygen levels and complications with delayed versus rapid sequence intubation
This tests whether delayed sequence intubation or rapid sequence intubation gives better oxygen levels and fewer complications for adults who are breathing on their own but need a breathing tube for non‑traumatic reasons.
-
Intravenous labetalol versus lignocaine to reduce heart rate and blood pressure spikes during intubation for laparoscopic gallbladder removal
This test will try a single IV dose of labetalol or lignocaine given before intubation to see which better prevents sudden heart rate and blood pressure rises in adults having elective laparoscopic gallbladder surgery.
-
Timing of a single dexmedetomidine dose before laryngoscopy and intubation and its effect on stress response.
This trial will test whether giving one dose of dexmedetomidine earlier or closer to surgery can reduce the blood pressure and heart rate changes caused by laryngoscopy and intubation in adults aged 18–65 with ASA I–II.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.