Clinical trial Recruiting at 1 site Observational Ages 2 to 10

Two Videolaryngoscopes for Intubating Children: A Pediatric Comparison

Official title: Evaluation Of Two Different Videolaryngoscopes İn A Pediatric Patient Group; Prospectus Observational Study

Run by Samsun University · NCT07837882 · Data updated 2026-11-12

This observational study tests how two different videolaryngoscopes perform during pediatric intubations to see which makes the process quicker and easier.

Quick facts

Study typeObservational
Ages2 Years to 10 Years
SexAll
Enrollment60 (estimated)
SponsorSamsun University
Academic / other
Locations1 site (Samsun, Mağaza Seçiniz)
StatusRecruiting
StartedMay 1, 2026
Main results expectedDecember 30, 2026
Study endsDecember 31, 2026
Registry record updatedSeptember 24, 2026
Trial IDNCT07837882 on ClinicalTrials.gov

Is this trial a fit for you?

Likely a good fit

Children aged 2-10 years, weighing 10-40 kg, ASA I-II, scheduled for elective surgery requiring general anesthesia with intubation.

Probably not a fit

Children with difficult airways identified preoperatively or conditions suggesting higher risk of rapid serial intubation may not benefit from comparisons intended for routine cases.

A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.

What this trial studies

The study compares two videolaryngoscope devices in children undergoing elective surgery who require general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation. Outcomes include intubation time and a pediatric-specific intubation difficulty score (PeDiAC) compared to the traditional Cormack-Lehane classification. It aims to determine if there are differences in ease and safety of airway management between the Endolarenx and Besdata devices. The investigation builds on evidence that videolaryngoscopy may improve airway visualization but may alter the relationship between view quality and tube placement difficulty. No randomization is described, as this is an observational assessment of device performance in routine practice.

Why it matters

Potential benefit: If one device shows clearer visualization and faster intubation, it could streamline pediatric anesthesia and reduce airway-related complications.

How similar studies have gone: Previous work supports the use of videolaryngoscopy in pediatric intubation, but head-to-head comparisons of specific devices remain limited.

Who can join: the full rules

Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria:

* ASA I-II
* 10-40 kg
* 2-10 years old
* Elective surgery
* Requirement for intubation under general anesthesia
* Expected normal airway

Exclusion Criteria:

* Difficult airway on preoperative assessment
* Need for rapid serial intubation
* History of previous difficult intubation
* Cervical instability
* Upper respiratory tract infection within the last 4 weeks
* Neuromuscular disease
* History of asthma

Where it's running

  • Samsun University
    Samsun, Mağaza Seçiniz, Turkey (Türkiye)
    Recruiting

Study contacts

Similar studies

Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.

How to take part

  1. Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
  2. Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
  3. Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.
Last reviewed 2026-11-14 by the Find a Trial editorial team. Information on this page is for educational purposes and is not medical advice. Always consult qualified healthcare professionals about clinical trial participation.