Transanal vs Robotic Total Mesorectal Excision for Low Rectal Cancer
Official title: A Prospective, Randomized, Parallel-Controlled, Superiority Clinical Study Comparing Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision (taTME) and Robot-Assisted Total Mesorectal Excision (RTME) in the Treatment of Low Rectal Cancer
Run by Sun Yat-sen University · NCT07651553 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This study tests whether taTME or robot-assisted TME works better for low rectal cancer patients and whether one method leads to fewer complications or conversions.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years to 75 Years |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 216 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Sun Yat-sen University Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Guangzhou, Guangdong) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | June 30, 2025 |
| Main results expected | April 28, 2027 |
| Study ends | April 28, 2029 |
| Registry record updated | June 16, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT07651553 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Adults 18-75 with newly diagnosed, localized rectal adenocarcinoma (≤7 cm from the anal verge) suitable for sphincter-preserving TME and good performance status (ASA I-III, ECOG 0-1).
✕Probably not a fit
Patients with advanced disease, distant metastases, significant comorbidities, or anatomy not amenable to sphincter-preserving TME may not benefit from the findings.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This randomized, parallel-controlled trial compares transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME) with robot-assisted total mesorectal excision (rTME) in adults with low rectal cancer. The primary endpoint is intraoperative conversion rate, with secondary focus on complications and the ability to preserve the sphincter. Eligible participants have confirmed adenocarcinoma of the rectum, tumor within 7 cm of the anal verge, and suitable performance status. Surgeries are conducted at a single leading center in Guangzhou, China, with standard perioperative care. The goal is to generate high-level evidence to guide surgical decision-making for sphincter-preserving options.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If one technique proves safer or more effective, patients could benefit from fewer conversions and complications, improving recovery and sphincter preservation.
How similar studies have gone: Direct comparisons of taTME and robot-assisted TME are limited, making this head-to-head trial a novel contribution with potential for meaningful impact.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria:Newly diagnosed patients aged 18-75 years. Pathologically confirmed adenocarcinoma (tubular, papillary, mucinous, or signet-ring). Tumor ≤7 cm from anal verge (MRI or DRE). Clinical stage T1-T3, N+, M0 (AJCC 8th ed.), suitable for sphincter-preserving TME. ASA score I-III. ECOG performance status 0-1. Informed consent obtained. \- Exclusion Criteria: Synchronous/metachronous colorectal cancers, local recurrence, or distant metastases. Bowel obstruction, perforation, bleeding requiring emergency surgery. Involvement of sphincter or adjacent organs requiring Inter-sphincter Resection (ISR). Poor preoperative anal function/incontinence. IBD or familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP). Pregnancy or lactation. Severe psychiatric illness. Other malignancies within 5 years. Severe comorbidities or infections making surgery intolerable. Judged unsuitable by investigator.
Where it's running
-
the sixth affiliated hospital of Sun Yat-sen University
Guangzhou, Guangdong, China Recruiting
Study contacts
- Principal investigator: Liang Kang — Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University
- Study coordinator: Liang Kang, MD
- Email: kangl@mail.sysu.edu.cn
- Phone: +8613602886833
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
NeoCSR-Omics: CAPOX and Serplulimab Before or After Short-Course RT in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer
This trial tests whether giving CAPOX chemotherapy with the PD-1 blocker serplulimab before or after short-course radiotherapy helps people with locally advanced rectal cancer achieve complete clinical or pathological responses.
-
PPISR for low- to mid-rectal cancer with anus-sparing aim
This study tests whether Precision Partial Intersphincteric Resection can be safely used to remove certain rectal cancers while preserving the anus.
-
BT-001 plus pembrolizumab for localized pMMR rectal cancer
This early-phase trial tests whether adding the oncolytic virus BT-001 to pembrolizumab is safe and tolerable for adults with localized pMMR rectal cancer prior to definitive surgery.
-
Gynecological and sexual aftereffects following rectal cancer treatment
This work will test whether gynecological anatomical changes after rectal cancer treatment are linked to ongoing sexual problems in women aged 18–60 who are in remission.
-
Selective completion total mesorectal excision guided by intra-operative frozen pathology after local excision for low rectal cancer
This trial tests whether using an immediate frozen-pathology result after local excision to decide if a full total mesorectal excision is needed can keep cancer controlled for adults with low rectal cancer who had a near-complete or small residual response to preoperative chemoradiotherapy.
-
Radiotherapy Plus CAPOX and Iparomlimab and Tuvonralimab as Neoadjuvant Therapy for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer
This trial tests whether adding immunotherapy with chemotherapy and radiotherapy before surgery can improve how well locally advanced rectal cancer responds.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.