Clinical trial No longer in our active list Interventional Ages 20 and up

Testing breathing support methods for patients on ventilators

Official title: A Cluster-Randomized Crossover Trial to Compare Spontaneous Breathing Trial With T-piece or Inspiratory Pressure Augmentation

Run by National Taiwan University Hospital · NCT04222205 · Data updated 2026-05-14

This study is no longer in our active list. It may have stopped recruiting or finished. The details below are as of 2026-05-14 and are kept for reference. Check ClinicalTrials.gov for its current status, or see similar studies below.

This study tests two different ways to help patients on ventilators breathe on their own to see which method helps them get off the ventilator safely and more successfully.

Quick facts

Study typeInterventional
Ages20 Years and up
SexAll
Enrollment2143 (estimated)
SponsorNational Taiwan University Hospital
Academic / other
Locations3 sites (Taipei, Please Select and 2 other locations)
Trial IDNCT04222205 on ClinicalTrials.gov

Is this trial a fit for you?

Likely a good fit

Ideal candidates are adults in the ICU who are receiving invasive mechanical ventilation and meet specific readiness criteria for a spontaneous breathing trial.

Probably not a fit

Patients who are under 20 years old, on do-not-intubate orders, or have been on mechanical ventilation for less than 12 hours may not benefit from this study.

A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.

What this trial studies

This study evaluates two methods for conducting spontaneous breathing trials (SBT) in patients who are being weaned off mechanical ventilation. The researchers will compare the effectiveness of T-piece breathing versus inspiratory pressure augmentation to determine which method leads to higher success rates in weaning patients from invasive mechanical ventilation. The goal is to identify patients ready for extubation without risking premature removal from the ventilator. The study aims to reduce the duration of mechanical ventilation and minimize the risk of reintubation.

Why it matters

Potential benefit: If successful, this study could improve the weaning process for mechanically ventilated patients, leading to faster recovery and reduced hospital stays.

How similar studies have gone: Previous studies have shown varying success with different SBT methods, but this specific comparison of inspiratory pressure augmentation versus T-piece is relatively novel.

Who can join: the full rules

Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria:

1. Admitted to the adult intensive care unit (ICU)
2. Receiving invasive mechanical ventilation via an endotracheal tube
3. Ready to start an SBT\* \*The criteria of readiness to an SBT include FiO2 ≤ 0.4, PEEP ≤ 8 cmH2O, minute ventilation ≤ 0.15 L/min/predicted body weight, inspiratory pressure or driving pressure ≤ 14 cm H2O, stable cardiovascular status and no worsening of non-pulmonary organ function.

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Age \< 20 years
2. Receiving mechanical ventilation via tracheostomy
3. Mechanical ventilation \< 12 hours
4. Invasive ventilation started before the index hospitalization
5. On do-not-intubate order

Where it's running

  • National Taiwan University Hospital
    Taipei, Please Select, Taiwan
    Recruiting
  • National Taiwan University Hospital Hsin-Chu Branch
    Hsin-Chu, Taiwan
    Recruiting
  • National Taiwan University Hospital Yunlin Branch
    Yunlin, Taiwan
    Recruiting

Study contacts

Similar studies

Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.

How to take part

  1. Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
  2. Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
  3. Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.
Last reviewed 2026-11-14 by the Find a Trial editorial team. Information on this page is for educational purposes and is not medical advice. Always consult qualified healthcare professionals about clinical trial participation.