Telerehabilitation for stroke: motor relearning vs. conventional therapy
Official title: Comparative Effects of Telerehabilitation Based Motor Relearning Program and Telerehabilitation Based Conventional Physical Therapy on Motor Function and Balance in Stroke Patients.
Run by Riphah International University · NCT07725003 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This study tests whether a telerehabilitation-based motor relearning program works better or about the same as telerehabilitation-based conventional physical therapy for improving motor function and balance after stroke.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 40 Years to 70 Years |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 30 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Riphah International University Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Faisalabad, Punjab Province) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | June 5, 2025 |
| Main results expected | August 6, 2026 |
| Study ends | August 6, 2026 |
| Registry record updated | July 24, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT07725003 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Adults 40–70 years old, 3–12 months after ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke, with MMSE ≥24 and reliable internet access, able to consent and participate in telerehabilitation.
✕Probably not a fit
Individuals with MMSE <24, other neurological conditions, uncontrolled cardiovascular conditions, or barriers to internet-enabled care may not benefit.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This randomized comparison evaluates two telerehabilitation approaches for stroke recovery: a motor relearning program delivered remotely versus conventional telerehabilitation physical therapy. Adults aged 40–70 who are 3–12 months post-stroke and meet cognitive and internet access criteria will be assigned to either intervention. Outcomes will focus on motor function and balance, with the goal of determining if the motor relearning approach offers added benefits or similar results to standard telerehabilitation. Prior evidence suggests telerehabilitation can improve mobility and balance and increase access to care, particularly in nonurban settings.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, participants may experience greater improvements in balance and motor function and easier access to rehabilitation through home-based sessions.
How similar studies have gone: Previous telerehabilitation studies and meta-analyses show improved balance and motor outcomes and good adherence, supporting this approach as feasible and beneficial.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: \* Adults aged 40-70 years. * Male or female participants. * Diagnosed with ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke 3-12 months prior to enrollment. * Medically stable and cleared to participate in physical rehabilitation. * Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score ≥24. * Able to understand and follow verbal instructions. * Have access to a smartphone, tablet, or computer with a stable internet connection for telerehabilitation sessions. * Willing and able to provide written informed consent. Exclusion Criteria: \* MMSE score \<24 or severe cognitive impairment. * Presence of other neurological disorders (e.g., Parkinson's disease or multiple sclerosis). * Uncontrolled hypertension or recent cardiac event. * Severe visual, auditory, or communication impairments that prevent participation. * Currently enrolled in another structured rehabilitation program. * Any musculoskeletal or medical condition that would interfere with safe participation in the intervention.
Where it's running
-
Aziz Fatimah Hospital
Faisalabad, Punjab Province, Pakistan Recruiting
Study contacts
- Principal investigator: Misbah Waris, phd — Riphah International University
- Study coordinator: Imran Amjad, phd
- Email: imran.amjad@riphah.edu.pk
- Phone: +923324390125
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Deep phenotyping to explore recovery in young adults after stroke
This project will test whether a detailed health and sample-collection approach (deep phenotyping) is practical and acceptable for people aged 18–55 who have had a stroke.
-
Stem cell therapy for chronic stroke recovery
This study is testing whether using a patient's own stem cells can help people with long-term stroke recovery feel better and improve their daily functioning.
-
AI-based tools to help diagnose, treat and predict stroke outcomes across multiple hospitals
This study tests AI-powered tools on real-world stroke patients to see if they can improve pre-hospital triage, diagnosis, and outcome prediction while data stay securely within each hospital.
-
Web-based therapy using action observation and mirror therapy for arm weakness after stroke
This trial tests whether a mobile telerehabilitation app delivering action observation therapy (AOT) alone or combined AOT with mirror therapy (AOT-MT) can improve upper limb function in people with subacute stroke.
-
Remote Ischaemic Conditioning for Fatigue After Stroke 2
Aat least 12 weeks after stroke, adults with post-stroke fatigue will try a simple hand-arm cuff treatment at home to see if it helps reduce fatigue.
-
Dual-task balance training plus computer-based cognitive training after stroke
In adults who recently had a stroke, the study tests whether adding computerized cognitive exercises to balance training improves balance and other recovery outcomes.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.