Tele-rehabilitation–based hand therapy vs clinic-based constrained movement therapy for chronic stroke
Official title: TELE-REHABILITATION VERSUS CLINIC-BASED MODIFIED CONSTRAINT-INDUCED MOVEMENT THERAPY FOR UPPER LIMB FUNCTION IN CHRONIC STROKE PATIENTS
Run by University of Lahore · NCT07720609 · Data updated 2026-11-12
A 68-person trial is testing whether delivering modified constraint-induced movement therapy for the affected arm via tele-rehab works as well as in-clinic therapy for people with chronic stroke.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 35 Years to 75 Years |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 68 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | University of Lahore Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Lahore, Punjab Province) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | July 18, 2026 |
| Main results expected | September 6, 2026 |
| Study ends | September 6, 2026 |
| Registry record updated | July 22, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT07720609 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Adults 35–75 years with chronic stroke (≥6 months), moderate motor impairment (modified Ashworth ≥2) and adequate internet access for tele-rehab.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients without sufficient internet access, significant cognitive or communication barriers, or those already engaging in intensive upper-limb therapy may see limited benefit.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This randomized, single-center study compares tele-rehabilitation-based modified constraint-induced movement therapy (mCIMT) with traditional clinic-based mCIMT in adults aged 35–75 who are at least 6 months post-stroke. Participants receive heat, stretching, range-of-motion exercises, and task-oriented activities with a constraint mitt on the unaffected arm, three times per week for six weeks, plus a daily home practice target of 4 hours. Outcome assessors are blinded to group assignment. The tele-rehab arm uses supervised virtual sessions and a home program, while the clinic arm delivers the same components in person. Primary endpoints are changes in upper-limb function from baseline to post-treatment.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, tele-rehabilitation could expand access to effective upper-limb therapy for stroke survivors who cannot regularly attend in-person sessions.
How similar studies have gone: Previous studies support mCIMT in improving arm function; tele-rehab approaches are promising but vary in evidence quality, making this direct comparison valuable.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Participant with age from 35 to 75 years * Both gender * Patients after 6 month of stroke. * Participant with flexion and abduction at shoulder minimum 10-15 degree and 5-10 degree at wrist and thumb/digit. * Participants with access to a smartphone or laptop with internet connectivity and the ability to use it for tele-rehabilitation sessions. * Participant with modified ashworth scale score of 2 or higher. * Participants who have internet access and can also engage in video conferences. Exclusion Criteria: * Patient with any neurological issues apart from stroke that might impact motor function. * Patient who is not able to follow the commands or are unable to cooperate. * Patient with any autoimmune disorder like rheumatoid arthritis that might impact arm function. * Patient with history of epilepsy. Participant who are involved in any fitness program that can improve upper extremity function.
Where it's running
-
Shadman Medical Center, Lahore
Lahore, Punjab Province, Pakistan Recruiting
Study contacts
- Principal investigator: Kainat Tariq, MSPTN — The University of Lahore, Lahore
- Study coordinator: Kainat Tariq, MSPTN
- Email: kainattariq06@gmail.com
- Phone: 03328256500
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Unimanual vs. Bimanual Motor Skill Learning After Stroke
The study tests whether people with acute or chronic stroke, as well as healthy controls, can learn and remember a complex motor task using one hand or both, with robotic devices REAplan and Dextrain.
-
Swiss ball balance training compared with kinesthetic training for chronic stroke
In people with chronic stroke, this study tests whether Swiss ball balance exercises improve balance and daily movement more than kinesthetic training.
-
Multifocal theta-burst stimulation to boost arm recovery after stroke
This trial tests whether sequential intermittent theta-burst brain stimulation to motor and parietal areas, combined with tablet-based arm training, can improve arm movement in adults with chronic stroke-related weakness.
-
Noninvasive brain stimulation plus cognitive-motor dual-task gait training to improve thinking and walking after stroke
This trial will test whether adding high-definition noninvasive brain stimulation (tDCS or tACS) to cognitive-motor dual-task gait training and standard physical therapy helps thinking, brain activity, spinal reflexes, and walking in adults 2 weeks to 5 years after a stroke.
-
Q Therapeutic System to improve arm and hand function after chronic stroke
This trial will try the Q Therapeutic (BQ 3.0) electromagnetic stimulation system with guided arm exercises to see if it improves upper limb function in people 6 months to 5 years after a stroke.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.