Sutureless hemorrhoidectomy vs conventional ligation for advanced hemorrhoids
Official title: Sutureless Hemorrhoidectomy Versus Conventional Ligation: A Comparative Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial
Run by Sohag University · NCT07824999 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This study tests whether a sutureless, energy-based hemorrhoidectomy can reduce pain and recovery time compared with the standard Milligan-Morgans procedure in adults with Grade III–IV hemorrhoids.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years and up |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 50 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Sohag University Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Sohag) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | October 1, 2026 |
| Main results expected | April 1, 2027 |
| Study ends | October 1, 2027 |
| Registry record updated | September 17, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT07824999 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Adults aged 18 or older with symptomatic Grade III–IV hemorrhoidal disease requiring excisional hemorrhoidectomy.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients with Grade I–II hemorrhoids, acute thrombosed external hemorrhoids, or other anorectal conditions may not benefit from this comparison.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
In this prospective randomized trial, adults with symptomatic Grade III–IV hemorrhoidal disease are assigned to either sutureless hemorrhoidectomy using an energy-based vessel sealing device or the conventional Milligan-Morgan ligation method. The study aims to compare perioperative and postoperative outcomes, including pain, bleeding, wound healing, complications, return to normal activities, and recurrence over a 6-month follow-up. Standardized analgesia and postoperative care are provided, with follow-ups at 1 week, 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months. Conducted at Sohag University Hospital, the trial enrolls 50 participants (25 per arm) to determine if the sutureless approach offers advantages in recovery and safety. Outcomes will inform whether energy-based sutureless techniques can become preferred options for advanced hemorrhoidal surgery.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, patients could experience less postoperative pain, faster recovery, and fewer complications with a less invasive hemorrhoidectomy approach.
How similar studies have gone: Previous evidence supports the concept of energy-based, sutureless techniques reducing tissue trauma, but randomized data in advanced hemorrhoids remain limited, making this study relatively novel in this context.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Adult patients aged 18 years or older. * Patients with symptomatic grade III or grade IV hemorrhoidal disease. * Combined internal and external hemorrhoidal disease requiring excisional hemorrhoidectomy. * Recurrent bleeding, prolapse, pain, mucous discharge, or hygiene difficulty despite conservative or office-based treatment. Exclusion Criteria: * Patients younger than 18 years. * Grade I or grade II hemorrhoids suitable for conservative or office-based therapy. * Acute thrombosed external hemorrhoids requiring emergency management. * Associated anal fissure, fistula-in-ano, perianal abscess, or inflammatory bowel disease. * Suspected or confirmed colorectal malignancy\[cite: 1\]. * History of previous anorectal surgery\[cite: 1\]. * Bleeding diathesis, uncontrolled anticoagulant therapy, or severe coagulopathy\[cite: 1\].
Where it's running
-
Sohag University Hospital, Department of General Surgery
Sohag, Egypt Recruiting
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Ligasure vs. Conventional Diathermy in Hemorrhoidectomy
This study tests whether using the Ligasure device during hemorrhoidectomy reduces pain and bleeding compared with conventional diathermy in patients with symptomatic hemorrhoids.
-
Botulinum toxin A injection before hemorrhoid surgery to reduce postoperative pain
This study will see if injecting botulinum toxin A into the internal anal sphincter a week before hemorrhoidectomy reduces post-operative pain for adults with grade III–IV hemorrhoids.
-
Pudendal nerve block versus sacral erector spinae (ESP) block for pain after hemorrhoidectomy
This will test whether the sacral erector spinae (ESP) block gives equal or better pain relief than the pudendal nerve block for adults having elective hemorrhoid surgery.
-
Are hemorrhoids linked to varicose veins in the legs?
This project will see if adults with hemorrhoids are more likely to have varicose veins in their lower limbs by comparing 200 people with hemorrhoids to 200 patients with other benign anorectal conditions.
-
Ultrasound-guided sacral erector spinae plane block versus saddle block for anesthesia during hemorrhoidectomy
This will test whether an ultrasound-guided sacral erector spinae plane block works as well as a saddle block for adults having hemorrhoidectomy.
-
Trans-radial superior rectal artery embolisation for bleeding haemorrhoids
This pilot will try a minimally invasive trans‑radial embolisation of the superior rectal artery to stop bleeding in adults with grade II–IV haemorrhoids who do not want or cannot have surgery.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.