Ligasure vs. Conventional Diathermy in Hemorrhoidectomy
Official title: Ligasure Versus Conventional Diathermy in Hemorrhoidectomy
Run by Sohag University · NCT07878546 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This study tests whether using the Ligasure device during hemorrhoidectomy reduces pain and bleeding compared with conventional diathermy in patients with symptomatic hemorrhoids.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 40 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Sohag University Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Sohag) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | September 25, 2026 |
| Main results expected | March 26, 2027 |
| Study ends | April 25, 2027 |
| Registry record updated | October 16, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT07878546 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Adults with symptomatic hemorrhoids requiring hemorrhoidectomy who have no other rectal/pathological conditions or contraindications.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients with complicating anorectal conditions, recurrent hemorrhoids, or other contraindications may not benefit and could be more suitable for alternative treatments.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This prospective, interventional study compares two surgical approaches for hemorrhoidectomy: Ligasure and conventional diathermy. Forty patients with symptomatic hemorrhoids requiring surgery are assigned to one of two groups, undergoing hemorrhoidectomy with either Ligasure or standard diathermy. Outcomes include duration of postoperative pain, intraoperative and postoperative bleeding, time to return to work, itching after surgery, and time to resume normal life. The study is conducted at Sohag University, with Mohamad Refaey Mohamed as the site contact, and excludes patients with other rectal/anal pathologies, recurrent hemorrhoids, or other contraindications. The aim is to determine if Ligasure offers advantages in perioperative recovery and early return to daily activities.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If positive, using Ligasure could reduce pain and recovery time after hemorrhoidectomy and lower bleeding risk for patients.
How similar studies have gone: Previous similar comparisons in surgical settings have shown variable results; this study adds prospective data in hemorrhoidectomy for Ligasure versus conventional diathermy.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * all patients with symptomatic hemorrhoid require hemorrhoidectomy Exclusion Criteria: * presence of other rectal or anal pathology, patients with recurrent hemorrhoid, patients with other medcal or anasthetic contraindications
Where it's running
-
Mohamd Refaey Mohamed
Sohag, Egypt Recruiting
Study contacts
- Study coordinator: mohamed refaey, master
- Email: drmido2025@gmail.com
- Phone: 01126544564
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Sutureless hemorrhoidectomy vs conventional ligation for advanced hemorrhoids
This study tests whether a sutureless, energy-based hemorrhoidectomy can reduce pain and recovery time compared with the standard Milligan-Morgans procedure in adults with Grade III–IV hemorrhoids.
-
Botulinum toxin A injection before hemorrhoid surgery to reduce postoperative pain
This study will see if injecting botulinum toxin A into the internal anal sphincter a week before hemorrhoidectomy reduces post-operative pain for adults with grade III–IV hemorrhoids.
-
Pudendal nerve block versus sacral erector spinae (ESP) block for pain after hemorrhoidectomy
This will test whether the sacral erector spinae (ESP) block gives equal or better pain relief than the pudendal nerve block for adults having elective hemorrhoid surgery.
-
Are hemorrhoids linked to varicose veins in the legs?
This project will see if adults with hemorrhoids are more likely to have varicose veins in their lower limbs by comparing 200 people with hemorrhoids to 200 patients with other benign anorectal conditions.
-
Ultrasound-guided sacral erector spinae plane block versus saddle block for anesthesia during hemorrhoidectomy
This will test whether an ultrasound-guided sacral erector spinae plane block works as well as a saddle block for adults having hemorrhoidectomy.
-
Trans-radial superior rectal artery embolisation for bleeding haemorrhoids
This pilot will try a minimally invasive trans‑radial embolisation of the superior rectal artery to stop bleeding in adults with grade II–IV haemorrhoids who do not want or cannot have surgery.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.