Clinical trial Recruiting at 1 site Interventional

Ligasure vs. Conventional Diathermy in Hemorrhoidectomy

Official title: Ligasure Versus Conventional Diathermy in Hemorrhoidectomy

Run by Sohag University · NCT07878546 · Data updated 2026-11-12

This study tests whether using the Ligasure device during hemorrhoidectomy reduces pain and bleeding compared with conventional diathermy in patients with symptomatic hemorrhoids.

Quick facts

Study typeInterventional
SexAll
Enrollment40 (estimated)
SponsorSohag University
Academic / other
Locations1 site (Sohag)
StatusRecruiting
StartedSeptember 25, 2026
Main results expectedMarch 26, 2027
Study endsApril 25, 2027
Registry record updatedOctober 16, 2026
Trial IDNCT07878546 on ClinicalTrials.gov

Is this trial a fit for you?

Likely a good fit

Adults with symptomatic hemorrhoids requiring hemorrhoidectomy who have no other rectal/pathological conditions or contraindications.

Probably not a fit

Patients with complicating anorectal conditions, recurrent hemorrhoids, or other contraindications may not benefit and could be more suitable for alternative treatments.

A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.

What this trial studies

This prospective, interventional study compares two surgical approaches for hemorrhoidectomy: Ligasure and conventional diathermy. Forty patients with symptomatic hemorrhoids requiring surgery are assigned to one of two groups, undergoing hemorrhoidectomy with either Ligasure or standard diathermy. Outcomes include duration of postoperative pain, intraoperative and postoperative bleeding, time to return to work, itching after surgery, and time to resume normal life. The study is conducted at Sohag University, with Mohamad Refaey Mohamed as the site contact, and excludes patients with other rectal/anal pathologies, recurrent hemorrhoids, or other contraindications. The aim is to determine if Ligasure offers advantages in perioperative recovery and early return to daily activities.

Why it matters

Potential benefit: If positive, using Ligasure could reduce pain and recovery time after hemorrhoidectomy and lower bleeding risk for patients.

How similar studies have gone: Previous similar comparisons in surgical settings have shown variable results; this study adds prospective data in hemorrhoidectomy for Ligasure versus conventional diathermy.

Who can join: the full rules

Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria:

* all patients with symptomatic hemorrhoid require hemorrhoidectomy

Exclusion Criteria:

* presence of other rectal or anal pathology, patients with recurrent hemorrhoid, patients with other medcal or anasthetic contraindications

Where it's running

  • Mohamd Refaey Mohamed
    Sohag, Egypt
    Recruiting

Study contacts

Similar studies

Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.

How to take part

  1. Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
  2. Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
  3. Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.
Last reviewed 2026-11-14 by the Find a Trial editorial team. Information on this page is for educational purposes and is not medical advice. Always consult qualified healthcare professionals about clinical trial participation.