Pudendal nerve block versus sacral erector spinae (ESP) block for pain after hemorrhoidectomy
Official title: A Randomized, Double-Blind Trial Comparing Pudendal Block Versus Sacral ESP for Ambulatory Hemorrhoidectomy
Run by Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Bellinzona · NCT07350460 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This will test whether the sacral erector spinae (ESP) block gives equal or better pain relief than the pudendal nerve block for adults having elective hemorrhoid surgery.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years to 80 Years |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 64 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Bellinzona Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Bellinzona) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | January 5, 2026 |
| Main results expected | September 29, 2027 |
| Study ends | September 30, 2027 |
| Registry record updated | March 18, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT07350460 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Adults aged 18 or older scheduled for elective excisional hemorrhoidectomy who can provide informed consent, are ASA I–III, and meet the study's weight and BMI limits (not under 50 kg and BMI ≤40) are ideal candidates.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients who are pregnant, weigh under 50 kg, have BMI >40, have allergies to local anesthetics, significant coagulation disorders or anticoagulation, infection at the puncture site, relevant neurological disorders, severe psychiatric illness, or language barriers will be excluded and are unlikely to benefit from participation.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
Hemorrhoidectomy commonly causes significant postoperative pain that can slow recovery and increase unplanned healthcare use. The PUSHES trial randomizes 64 adults undergoing elective excisional hemorrhoidectomy under standardized spinal anesthesia to receive either an ultrasound-guided sacral ESP block or a pudendal nerve block, with sham procedures to maintain blinding. Outcomes include postoperative pain scores, opioid consumption, and recovery metrics such as time to discharge. The sacral ESP block is a newer, potentially simpler ultrasound-guided technique that may offer easier performance and a favorable safety profile compared with the pudendal block.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, the sacral ESP block could provide equal or better pain relief while being easier and safer to perform, potentially speeding recovery and reducing unplanned visits after hemorrhoidectomy.
How similar studies have gone: The pudendal block is an established option for postoperative analgesia, while sacral ESP blocks have encouraging case reports and small series but lack robust randomized trial evidence.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Adults (≥18 years old) scheduled for elective excisional hemorrhoidectomy; * Ability to understand the nature of the study and provide written informed consent; * American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-III; * Ability to comply with study procedures and postoperative evaluations. Exclusion Criteria: * Pregnancy; * Body weight under 50 kg due to the potential risk of local anaesthetic systemic toxicity (LAST); * BMI \> 40; Known allergy or contraindication to local anaesthetics (e.g., ropivacaine, prilocaine); * Severe coagulation disorders or current anticoagulant therapy contraindicating spinal or peripheral deep nerve blocks (like pudendal block, because Sacral ESP is considered a superficial block); * Infection at the puncture site; * Neurological disorders affecting the sacral or pudendal nerve pathways; * Severe psychiatric conditions impairing study participation; * Language barriers
Where it's running
-
Ospedale Regionale Bellinzona e Valli (ORBV) CH-6500 Bellinzona Switzerland
Bellinzona, Switzerland Recruiting
Study contacts
- Study coordinator: Roberto Dossi, Dr. Med.
- Email: Roberto.Dossi@eoc.ch
- Phone: 0041 (0)91 811
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Ligasure vs. Conventional Diathermy in Hemorrhoidectomy
This study tests whether using the Ligasure device during hemorrhoidectomy reduces pain and bleeding compared with conventional diathermy in patients with symptomatic hemorrhoids.
-
Sutureless hemorrhoidectomy vs conventional ligation for advanced hemorrhoids
This study tests whether a sutureless, energy-based hemorrhoidectomy can reduce pain and recovery time compared with the standard Milligan-Morgans procedure in adults with Grade III–IV hemorrhoids.
-
Botulinum toxin A injection before hemorrhoid surgery to reduce postoperative pain
This study will see if injecting botulinum toxin A into the internal anal sphincter a week before hemorrhoidectomy reduces post-operative pain for adults with grade III–IV hemorrhoids.
-
Energy-based therapies vs standard surgery for Grade III hemorrhoids
This trial tests three surgical options—two energy-based methods and conventional hemorrhoidectomy—to see which relieves pain and helps people recover fastest.
-
Are hemorrhoids linked to varicose veins in the legs?
This project will see if adults with hemorrhoids are more likely to have varicose veins in their lower limbs by comparing 200 people with hemorrhoids to 200 patients with other benign anorectal conditions.
-
Ultrasound-guided sacral erector spinae plane block versus saddle block for anesthesia during hemorrhoidectomy
This will test whether an ultrasound-guided sacral erector spinae plane block works as well as a saddle block for adults having hemorrhoidectomy.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.