Clinical trial Recruiting at 6 sites Phase 3 Interventional Ages 18 and up

Safety and effectiveness of NOA LIFT vs VOLIFT for correcting nasolabial folds in adults

Official title: A Prospective Multi-Center, Evaluator- and Subject- Blinded, Randomized Study to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of NOA LIFT Compared to JUVÉDERM VOLIFT With Lidocaine for the Correction of Nasolabial Folds

Run by AbbVie · NCT07794878 · Data updated 2026-11-12

This study tests whether NOA LIFT works as well as JUVÉDERM VOLIFT with lidocaine for correcting moderate to severe nasolabial folds in adults.

Quick facts

PhasePhase 3
Study typeInterventional
Ages18 Years and up
SexAll
Enrollment288 (estimated)
SponsorAbbVie
Industry-sponsored
Locations6 sites (Beijing, Beijing Municipality and 5 other locations)
StatusRecruiting
StartedAugust 19, 2026
Main results expectedAugust 2028
Study endsAugust 2028
Registry record updatedAugust 31, 2026
Trial IDNCT07794878 on ClinicalTrials.gov

Is this trial a fit for you?

Likely a good fit

Adults with moderate (2) to severe (3) nasolabial folds on both sides, as assessed by evaluator live assessment.

Probably not a fit

Participants whose condition does not respond to treatment or who experience unacceptable safety risks may not benefit.

A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.

What this trial studies

In this Phase 3 trial, adults with moderate to severe nasolabial folds are randomized to receive either NOA LIFT or JUVÉDERM VOLIFT with lidocaine. The study compares safety and effectiveness over about 12 months after treatment. Participants receive deep dermal injections at multiple sites in China and are followed to monitor adverse events and treatment outcomes. Approximately 288 participants will be enrolled across three Beijing/Guangzhou/Shenzhen centers. The trial uses a 2:1 randomization in favor of NOA LIFT.

Why it matters

Potential benefit: If successful, NOA LIFT could provide an effective alternative for correcting nasolabial folds.

How similar studies have gone: Similar HA filler comparisons have shown meaningful improvements in nasolabial folds, supporting this head-to-head approach.

Who can join: the full rules

Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria:

\- Moderate (2) or Severe (3) on the 5-point Nasolabial Fold Severity Scale (NLFSS) for each nasolabial fold (NLF) on evaluator live assessment (both sides must qualify and have the same score)

Exclusion Criteria:

* Current cutaneous or mucosal inflammatory or infectious processes, abscess, unhealed wound, or cancerous or precancerous lesion in the treatment area(s).
* Current enrollment in an investigational drug or device study or participation in such a study within 30 days before enrollment.

Where it's running

  • Peking Union Medical College Hospital (West) - Xidan Campus /ID# 267457
    Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
    Recruiting
  • Zhujiang Hospital /ID# 276566
    Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
    Recruiting
  • Peking University Shenzhen Hospital /ID# 268255
    Shenzhen, Guangdong, China
    Recruiting
  • Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital /ID# 267555
    Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
    Recruiting
  • Zhongda Hospital Of Southeast University /ID# 276571
    Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
    Recruiting
  • Xianyang Hospital of Yanan University /ID# 267936
    Xianyang, Shaanxi, China
    Recruiting

Study contacts

Similar studies

Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.

How to take part

  1. Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
  2. Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
  3. Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.
Last reviewed 2026-11-14 by the Find a Trial editorial team. Information on this page is for educational purposes and is not medical advice. Always consult qualified healthcare professionals about clinical trial participation.