Clinical trial Recruiting at 2 sites Interventional Ages 18 to 80

Rotating hinge vs condylar constrained knee implants in revision knee replacement

Official title: A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Reoperation Rates and Clinical Outcomes of Rotating Hinge Versus Condylar Constrained Knee Implants in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty

Run by Medstar Health Research Institute · NCT07818343 · Data updated 2026-11-12

This study tests whether rotating hinge knee implants perform similarly to condylar constrained implants when used to revise knee replacements in adults.

Quick facts

Study typeInterventional
Ages18 Years to 80 Years
SexAll
Enrollment186 (estimated)
SponsorMedstar Health Research Institute
Academic / other
Locations2 sites (Washington D.C., District of Columbia and 1 other locations)
StatusRecruiting
StartedFebruary 1, 2026
Main results expectedJanuary 2037
Study endsJanuary 2037
Registry record updatedSeptember 14, 2026
Trial IDNCT07818343 on ClinicalTrials.gov

Is this trial a fit for you?

Likely a good fit

Adults undergoing revision total knee arthroplasty requiring revision of both tibial and femoral components at participating centers.

Probably not a fit

Patients not meeting inclusion criteria, such as primary TKA, infection, age outside 18–80, pregnancy, cognitive or consent issues, or non-independent living situations, may not benefit.

A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.

What this trial studies

This interventional study compares two implant types used in revision total knee arthroplasty: rotating hinge knee (RHK) and condylar constrained knee (CCK). It looks at reoperation rates, patient satisfaction, loosening, and overall clinical outcomes, along with knee range of motion and stability at follow-up visits. The hypothesis is that RHK and CCK have similar reoperation rates and loosening rates, with potential improvements in stability and satisfaction for the rotating hinge device. The study will enroll adults undergoing revision TKA requiring both tibial and femoral component revisions, at two MedStar-affiliated centers in Maryland and Washington, DC.

Why it matters

Potential benefit: If successful, patients receiving the rotating hinge option may experience similar safety and durability to the condylar constrained option, with potential gains in knee stability and satisfaction.

How similar studies have gone: Previous studies with similar implants have shown variable outcomes, with some evidence supporting comparable reoperation and loosening rates between hinge and constrained designs in revisions.

Who can join: the full rules

Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion:

* Undergoing a revision total knee arthroplasty for any etiology
* Requires revision of both tibial and femoral components

Exclusion:

* Undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty
* Candidate for only rotating hinge knee implant
* Diagnosed with active infection
* Does not meet age criteria of \>18 or \<80
* Pregnant or breastfeeding
* Unable to consent
* Non-independent dweller (prisoner)

Where it's running

  • Medstar Georgetown University Hospital
    Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States
    Recruiting
  • Medstar Montgomery Medical Center
    Olney, Maryland, United States
    Recruiting

Study contacts

Similar studies

Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.

How to take part

  1. Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
  2. Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
  3. Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.
Last reviewed 2026-11-14 by the Find a Trial editorial team. Information on this page is for educational purposes and is not medical advice. Always consult qualified healthcare professionals about clinical trial participation.