Repeated intravenous prourokinase for ischemic stroke with medium to large vessel occlusion within 4.5 hours
Official title: Repeated Intravenous Thrombolysis for Ischemic Stroke With Medium to Large Vessel Occlusion Presenting Within 4.5 Hours of Onset With Prourokinase (RITIS-PUK): a Prospective, Randomized, Open Label, Blinded Assessment of Outcome, and Multi-center Study
Run by General Hospital of Shenyang Military Region · NCT07550296 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This study tests whether giving an extra infusion of prourokinase after initial treatment helps restore blood flow in adults with acute ischemic stroke due to medium or large vessel blockages within 4.5 hours.
Quick facts
| Phase | Phase 2 |
|---|---|
| Study type | Interventional |
| Ages | 18 Years to 80 Years |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 122 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | General Hospital of Shenyang Military Region Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Shenyang, None Selected) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | May 6, 2026 |
| Main results expected | December 30, 2027 |
| Study ends | December 30, 2027 |
| Registry record updated | June 30, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT07550296 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Adults with acute ischemic stroke due to medium or large vessel occlusion within 4.5 hours who have already received prourokinase and show insufficient early improvement and no planned thrombectomy.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients without persistent occlusion, with hemorrhagic transformation, or who are not suitable for repeat thrombolysis may not benefit and could be exposed to added risk.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This phase II trial evaluates the safety and potential benefit of a second intravenous dose of prourokinase in patients with acute ischemic stroke who have large or medium vessel occlusions and have already received prourokinase but show no major early improvement. Eligible patients arrive within 4.5 hours of onset and have measurable deficits, with imaging confirming occlusion and ruling out hemorrhage after the first treatment. The study will monitor recanalization rates, functional outcomes, and adverse events to determine whether repeat thrombolysis can improve restoration of blood flow and clinical recovery. No planned thrombectomy is required in this protocol, and results will inform whether this approach warrants further investigation in larger trials.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, patients could have higher chances of vessel reopening and better functional recovery without needing endovascular intervention.
How similar studies have gone: Previous work suggests prourokinase may be non-inferior to alteplase with a favorable safety profile, while the benefit of repeated thrombolysis remains exploratory and not yet proven.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Age ≥ 18 year; * Acute ischemic stroke presumably caused by large or medium vessel occlusion within 4.5 hours of onset, having received intravenous thrombolysis of prourokinase, and with no planned thrombectomy; * Measurable neurological deficit before the first intravenous thrombolysis, with NIHSS ≥ 4; * Baseline pc-ASPECTS/ASPECTS ≥ 6, and for posterior circulation infarction, a Pontine-Midbrain Index ≤ 2 (assessed by CT or DWI); * No significant clinical improvement (reduction in NIHSS ≤ 2) or neurological deterioration after initial improvement at 1 hour after the first thrombolysis; * Follow-up imaging (CTA or MRA) at 1 hour after the first thrombolysis rules out intracranial hemorrhage and confirms the presence of large or medium vessel occlusion (internal carotid artery, M1-M3 segments of the middle cerebral artery, A1-A3 segments of the anterior cerebral artery, P1-P3 segments of the posterior cerebral artery, basilar artery or V4 segment of the vertebral artery, PICA, AICA, or SCA); * The second intravenous thrombolysis can be administered within 6 hours of onset; * First stroke onset or past stroke without obvious neurological deficit (mRS≤1); * Signed informed consent. Exclusion Criteria: * Planed for endovascular treatment; * Significant white matter hyperintensities (Fazekas score 3); * Any coagulation abnormality before the first thrombolysis, including INR \> 1.5; * Receipt of dual antiplatelet therapy within 24 hours prior to thrombolysis.; * Pregnancy; * Allergy to the investigational drug(s); * Comorbidity with other serious diseases; * Participating in other clinical trials within 3 months; * Patients not suitable for the study considered by researcher.
Where it's running
-
Hui-Sheng Chen
Shenyang, None Selected, China Recruiting
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Short-Term outside-in nerve stimulation for acute ischemic stroke
This trial tests whether a 5-day external trigeminal nerve stimulation given after stroke can help more patients recover better than a sham treatment.
-
Sevoflurane vs. Propofol for anesthesia in stroke patients undergoing clot-removal
This study tests whether sevoflurane or propofol used for anesthesia during endovascular treatment of an acute ischemic stroke affects the final brain damage and recovery.
-
Safety of adding NRICM301 to standard care for adults with acute ischemic stroke
This study tests whether adding NRICM301, a traditional Chinese medicine formula, to usual care is safe for adults with acute ischemic stroke.
-
Intracranial Recanalization with LT3001 in Acute Ischemic Stroke
This phase II study tests whether LT3001 given to adults with acute ischemic stroke can help reopen blocked brain arteries.
-
Mobilisation After Endovascular Stroke Treatment
This study checks whether moving around 12 hours after endovascular stroke treatment is as safe as moving around 24 hours for people with an acute ischemic stroke.
-
Endovascular therapy plus standard care vs standard care alone for distal and medium vessel strokes
In people with acute ischemic stroke due to distal or medium vessel blockages, this study tests whether adding endovascular treatment to the usual medical care helps improve outcomes compared with medical care alone.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.