Quadro-Iliac Plane Block for Hip Surgery: Observational Insights
Official title: The Effectiveness of the "Quadro-Iliac Plane Block" in Hip Surgery: A Prospective Observational Clinical Study
Run by San Giovanni di Dio Hospital · NCT07591311 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This study tests how well the QIP block, used during hip surgery, works for pain and recovery compared with other regional anesthesia techniques.
Quick facts
| Study type | Observational |
|---|---|
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 80 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | San Giovanni di Dio Hospital Academic / other |
| Locations | 2 sites (Crotone and 1 other locations) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | May 4, 2026 |
| Main results expected | June 2027 |
| Study ends | November 2027 |
| Registry record updated | September 2, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT07591311 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Adults 18 years or older undergoing hip surgery (elective or fracture-related) with planned neuraxial or locoregional anesthesia and consent.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients not receiving the QIP block or those whose pain and recovery are not improved by locoregional anesthesia may see no benefit.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This prospective, non-randomized observational study collects data on adults undergoing hip surgery who receive locoregional anesthesia as part of routine care. It focuses on the Quadro-Iliac Plane (QIP) block and compares it with other regional techniques like fascia iliaca and PENG blocks, among others, to see how they affect recovery and pain. Outcomes include Quality of Recovery (QoR-15) at 24 hours, pain at rest and movement up to 48 hours, analgesic use, time to first analgesic, and time to mobilization. Procedures are ultrasound-guided and performed per standard clinical practice with usual perioperative care. The primary endpoint is QoR-15 at 24 hours; secondary endpoints cover pain scores, analgesic consumption, and functional milestones.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, patients may experience better early recovery and pain control after hip surgery with certain regional anesthesia techniques.
How similar studies have gone: Previous studies of regional blocks for hip surgery have shown mixed but promising results; this observational approach adds real-world data on QIP use.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Age ≥ 18 years * Patients undergoing hip surgery, either elective or for a proximal femoral fracture * Expected postoperative hospital stay ≥ 24 hours * ASA physical status I-III * Neuraxial and/or locoregional anesthesia according to standard clinical practice * Provision of informed consent to participate in the study Exclusion Criteria: * Absence of informed consent * Contraindications to locoregional and/or spinal anesthesia * Allergy to local anesthetic agents * Cognitive impairment preventing reliable assessment of outcomes * Coagulation disorders and/or platelet abnormalities * Antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy that contraindicates spinal anesthesia * Presence of localized infection or sepsis at the sites to be treated
Where it's running
-
Crotone Hospital
Crotone, Italy Recruiting -
Crotone Hospital
Crotone, Italy Recruiting
Study contacts
- Study coordinator: Tommaso Sorrentino, MD
- Email: dr.sorrentinotommaso@gmail.com
- Phone: +393277038017
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Regional nerve blocks for anterior-approach hip replacement (SIFI vs ESP)
This trial will test whether adding a supra-inguinal fascia iliaca (SIFI) block or an erector spinae plane (ESP) block can reduce early pain and opioid side effects after elective anterior approach total hip replacement in adults.
-
Direct lateral vs posterolateral approach for cemented total hip replacement
This study tests whether the surgical approach affects muscle healing and early recovery after cemented total hip replacement in people with hip OA.
-
Patient-controlled remimazolam sedation under spinal anesthesia for hip replacement
In adults having hip replacement with spinal anesthesia, this study tests whether letting patients control their own sedation with remimazolam works as well as standard clinician-controlled sedation.
-
PENG versus Deep Iliacus Plane block for pain relief in intertrochanteric femur fractures
This study will see if PENG or Deep Iliacus Plane nerve blocks give better pain relief and make positioning for spinal anesthesia easier for adults having surgery for intertrochanteric hip fractures.
-
DIPB vs SIFIB for pain control after total hip replacement
This will test whether the Deep Iliacus Plane Block (DIPB) or the Suprainguinal Fascia Iliaca Block (SIFIB) gives better pain relief and less leg weakness for adults having elective total hip replacement.
-
Sacral ESPB versus PENG nerve block for pain after hip hemiarthroplasty
We will see if a sacral erector spinae plane (S-ESPB) block or a pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block gives better pain relief for adults 50–90 having hip hemiarthroplasty for a femoral neck fracture.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.