Long-term half-dose apixaban versus aspirin after Watchman implantation
Official title: Optimal Anti-Thrombotic Management Following Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion (INTEGRAL)
Run by Texas Cardiac Arrhythmia Research Foundation · NCT07840365 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This trial tests whether continuing a half-dose blood thinner (apixaban) is better than aspirin after Watchman device implantation in people with atrial fibrillation.
Quick facts
| Phase | Phase 3 |
|---|---|
| Study type | Interventional |
| Ages | 18 Years and up |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 234 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Texas Cardiac Arrhythmia Research Foundation Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Austin, Texas) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | September 1, 2026 |
| Main results expected | December 15, 2028 |
| Study ends | September 30, 2029 |
| Registry record updated | October 5, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT07840365 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Adults (18+) with AF who had a successful Watchman LAA occlusion and are able to comply with follow-up, without contraindications to aspirin or apixaban.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients with mechanical valves or conditions mandating another antithrombotic strategy, or those with contraindications to aspirin or apixaban, may not benefit.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This Phase 3 randomized study compares two antithrombotic strategies after successful Watchman left atrial appendage occlusion in AF patients. Participants are assigned 1:1 to either half-dose apixaban monotherapy or full-dose apixaban for 45 days followed by aspirin monotherapy, with follow-up visits and transesophageal echocardiography to monitor device function and thrombus formation. The primary endpoint is a composite of device-related thrombosis, stroke/TIA, and major bleeding. Analyses include intention-to-treat, with planned post-hoc secondary analyses. Enrollment is conducted at the Texas Cardiovascular centers with a lead sponsor and no stated collaborators.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, this approach could reduce the risk of thromboembolism and major bleeding after LAA occlusion by identifying an optimal long-term antithrombotic strategy.
How similar studies have gone: Prior studies in LAA occlusion have explored antithrombotic regimens; this trial tests a novel long-term half-dose NOAC strategy with aspirin as an alternative.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * • Men and women ≥18 years of age; * Patients who underwent a clinically successful LAA closure procedure with a Watchman device (device implanted without procedural or bleeding complication) within a day or are scheduled to undergo the LAAO procedure * Paroxysmal, persistent, or permanent AF patients irrespective of prior antithrombotic treatment are eligible for randomization, * Written informed consent obtained from subject and ability for subject to comply with the requirements of the study. Exclusion Criteria: * Two or more clinical characteristics at baseline (age≥80 years, body weight ≤60 kg, serum creatinine ≥1.5 mg/dL) requiring apixaban dosage adjustment; * Mechanical heart valves or valvular disease requiring surgery or interventional procedure; * Mandatory indication for dual antiplatelet therapy (e.g. recent stent) or single anti-platelet treatment (SAPT) (e.g. high coronary risk); * Any contra-indication or known allergy to aspirin or clopidogrel or apixaban; * Any mandatory indication for anticoagulation for a reason other than AF (e.g. Pulmonary embolism); * Ongoing major bleeding or complicated or recent (\<72hours) major surgery; * Recent myocardial infarction (\<6 weeks); * Recent TE event (\<6 weeks) * Recent Intracranial bleeding (\< 6 months); * Prasugrel or ticagrelor concomitant use * Participating in an investigational drug or another device trial within the previous 30 days; * High likelihood of being unavailable for follow-up or psycho-social condition making study participation impractical; * Pregnancy or within 48 hours post-partum or breast feeding women; * Patient under legal protection.
Where it's running
-
Texas Cardiac Arrhythmia Institute, St. David's Medical Center
Austin, Texas, United States Recruiting
Study contacts
- Principal investigator: Andrea Natale, MD — Texas Cardiac Arrhythmia Institute, St. David's Medical Center
- Study coordinator: Sanghamitra Mohanty, MD MS
- Email: mitra.mohanty@stdavids.com
- Phone: 5125448198
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Pulsed Field vs Cryoballoon for Pulmonary Vein Isolation in Atrial Fibrillation
This trial tests whether pulsed field ablation can shorten the procedure for first-time PVI in AF patients compared with cryoballoon ablation, while keeping safety and effectiveness similar.
-
Pulsed Field Ablation vs Cryoablation for Atrial Fibrillation Under Deep Sedation
This trial tests whether pulsed field ablation (PFA) done under deep sedation works as well as cryoballoon ablation for treating atrial fibrillation, aiming to avoid general anesthesia.
-
Bachmann’s Bundle Pacing vs Right Atrial Appendage Pacing for AF
This study tests two common atrial pacing methods to see which one is safer over 12 months for people getting a new pacemaker, ICD, or CRT device.
-
AI-powered ECG to help diagnose and predict outcomes in heart disease
Researchers test an AI-enhanced ECG to help diagnose and predict outcomes for people with cardiovascular diseases.
-
Pace-and-ablate strategy in atrial fibrillation: who benefits and long-term outcomes
This study looks at adults with atrial fibrillation who underwent AV node ablation with permanent pacing to see who develops pacing-induced problems and how they do long-term.
-
AI-based cardiac analysis using 12-lead and 1-lead ECG
A clinician-facing pilot test to see if SmartECG-EF helps evaluate heart function using both 12-lead and single-lead ECGs in adults with heart conditions.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.