Predictors of Breast Implant Shell Fissure in Aesthetic Implants
Official title: Prospective Longitudinal Cohort Study of Implant Age, Pocket Plane, Incision, Surface Texture, and Volume as Predictors of Breast Implant Shell Fissure
Run by Research Inc · NCT07810257 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This study follows women with aesthetic breast implants to see if factors like implant age and surgical details predict shell fissures over five years.
Quick facts
| Study type | Observational |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years and up |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 3000 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Research Inc Industry-sponsored |
| Locations | 1 site (Medellín) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | January 12, 2014 |
| Main results expected | January 1, 2026 |
| Study ends | December 15, 2026 |
| Registry record updated | September 9, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT07810257 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Women aged 18 or older with aesthetic breast implants of known age and implant characteristics and no baseline fissure or rupture.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients with reconstructed implants, ruptured implants at baseline, or missing essential implant data may not benefit from the findings.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This prospective, observational cohort tracks women with cosmetic breast implants who have no shell fissure at baseline. Participants undergo annual clinical exams and imaging (ultrasound and MRI as needed) for up to five years to identify incident shell fissures and track progression to rupture. The study examines implant age, pocket plane, incision route, surface texture, and volume as potential predictors, using time-to-event analyses and central blinded reviews. Bilateral implants and competing risks are accounted for, with a multi-state model to explore progression from intact to fissure and rupture if data allow. A predefined radiologic and operative definition distinguishes focal fissures from other implant defects.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, the study could help clinicians identify patients at higher risk for shell fissures and tailor surveillance accordingly.
How similar studies have gone: Previous implant surveillance studies have shown that imaging and clinical factors can predict shell defects, but this prospective approach is relatively novel for integrating multiple predictors.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Female sex and age 18 years or older. * Aesthetic breast implant with known implantation date or year and known pocket plane, incision route, surface texture, and volume. * No fissure or rupture identified by the baseline imaging algorithm. * Ability to undergo annual ultrasound and confirmatory MRI when indicated. * Written informed consent. Exclusion Criteria: * Confirmed fissure or rupture at cohort entry. * Reconstructive breast implantation or tissue expander. * Immediate planned implant removal or exchange. * Missing core implant characteristics. * MRI contraindication when MRI is required to adjudicate a suspected event. * Recalled/PIP implant if excluded by the final analytic plan.
Where it's running
-
IQ interquirofanos
Medellín, Colombia Recruiting
Study contacts
- Principal investigator: juan velez, MD, plastic surgery
- Study coordinator: Juan Velez, MD, Plastic surgeon
- Email: info@velezlara.com
- Phone: +57 3054511588
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Zirconia versus titanium abutments for single posterior implant restorations
This study will test whether customized zirconia abutments or standard titanium abutments better protect the tissues, limit bone loss, and improve oral quality of life for adults receiving a single posterior implant crown.
-
Xperience™ versus dilute povidone-iodine to prevent infections after implant-based breast reconstruction
This trial will test whether Xperience™ surgical irrigation reduces infection and complication rates compared with dilute povidone-iodine in women 18 and older having implant-based breast reconstruction after mastectomy.
-
Improving symptoms by removing the Essure contraceptive implant
This study is testing if removing the Essure contraceptive implant can help women aged 35 to 75 who are having problems with the device feel better.
-
Comparing immediate implant placement techniques for dental implants
This study is testing two different ways to place dental implants right away to see which method helps them stay stable and have fewer problems.
-
Comparing immediate and delayed loading of maxillary overdenture implants
This study is testing whether putting in maxillary overdenture implants right away or waiting three months affects bone loss and other outcomes for patients over three years.
-
Comparing two methods for soft tissue augmentation at dental implant sites
This study is testing which method works better for improving soft tissue around dental implants by comparing a tissue graft from the patient to a special skin substitute.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.