PFO closure versus blood thinners to prevent repeat stroke in older adults

Patent Foramen Ovale-Related Stroke Management and Outcome: Age-dependent Risk Prediction and Atrial Cardiopathy Study (SENIOR Study)

Observational Taichung Veterans General Hospital · NCT07479147

This study will test whether closing a patent foramen ovale or taking direct oral anticoagulants better prevents repeat strokes in adults over 60 with PFO-related embolic stroke.

Quick facts

Study typeObservational
Enrollment400 (estimated)
Ages18 Years to 90 Years
SexAll
SponsorTaichung Veterans General Hospital Academic / other
Locations3 sites (Taichung and 2 other locations)
Trial IDNCT07479147 on ClinicalTrials.gov

What this trial studies

SENIOR is a multicenter hybrid registry combining retrospective (2013–2025) and prospective (Sept 15, 2025–Dec 31, 2031) cohorts to compare outcomes after PFO closure versus medical therapy including DOACs in patients with ESUS and PFO. The registry aims to enroll about 900 patients (500 retrospective, 400 prospective) from three major Taiwanese centers and will collect clinical, imaging, procedural, and follow-up data with a minimum 6-month follow-up. Inclusion focuses on adults with ESUS and PFO, with specific age- and RoPE-based criteria to select high-risk PFOs in both younger and older patients, while excluding extracardiac shunts and known non-PFO stroke mechanisms. Analyses will compare recurrent stroke rates and safety outcomes between closure and anticoagulation groups, and explore age-dependent risk prediction and markers of atrial cardiopathy.

Who should consider this trial

Good fit: Ideal candidates are adults diagnosed with ESUS and PFO—especially those over 60 with high-risk PFO features or a RoPE score ≥4 with cortical infarct, and younger adults with high-risk features or RoPE ≥7.

Not a fit: Patients whose stroke has a known alternative mechanism, those with extracardiac right-to-left shunts, or those unable to complete at least six months of follow-up are unlikely to benefit from the study findings.

Why it matters

Potential benefit: If successful, the results could clarify whether closure or modern anticoagulation better prevents recurrent stroke in older patients with PFO and guide treatment decisions.

How similar studies have performed: Randomized trials have shown benefit of PFO closure in selected patients under 60, and retrospective single-center data suggest closure can be effective and safe in older adults, but prospective head-to-head comparisons with DOACs are limited.

Eligibility criteria

Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria:

* Patient or his/her legal representative signs a written informed consent
* Participants who have diagnosed as PFO related stroke
* For patient aged 18-59: patient with high risk PFO feature or RoPE score ≥ 7
* For patient aged 60-90: patient with high risk PFO feature or RoPE score ≥ 4, must include cortical infarct

Exclusion Criteria:

* Follow-up less than 6 months
* Extracardiac right-to-left shunt
* Known stroke mechanism was diagnosed

Where this trial is running

Taichung and 2 other locations

Study contacts

How to participate

  1. Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
  2. Visit the official trial page on ClinicalTrials.gov for the most current contact information and recruitment status.
  3. Contact the listed study coordinator or principal investigator to request pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.
Conditions Ischemic StrokeEmbolic Stroke of Undetermined SourcePatent Foramen OvaleElderlypatent foramen ovalepatent foramen ovale closureembolic stroke of undetermined sourceelderly
Last reviewed 2026-06-13 by the Find a Trial editorial team. Information on this page is for educational purposes and is not medical advice. Always consult qualified healthcare professionals about clinical trial participation.