Personalized ventilation strategies for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome
Official title: Personalized Ventilatory Strategy Based on Ventilation-perfusion Mismatch and Lung Recruitability in Moderate-to-severe ARDS Patients
Run by Zhongda Hospital · NCT06430554 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This study is testing how different breathing support levels and body positions can help improve lung function in patients with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome.
Quick facts
| Study type | Observational |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years to 85 Years |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 40 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Zhongda Hospital Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Nanjing, Jiangsu) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | June 8, 2024 |
| Main results expected | December 30, 2026 |
| Study ends | December 30, 2026 |
| Registry record updated | September 3, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT06430554 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Ideal candidates include adults aged 18 to 85 with moderate-to-severe ARDS who require invasive mechanical ventilation.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients over 85 years old, pregnant women, or those with severe hemodynamic instability or contraindications to EIT monitoring may not benefit from this study.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This observational study investigates how different levels of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and body positions affect lung ventilation-perfusion matching in patients with moderate-to-severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). By utilizing electrical impedance tomography (EIT), the study aims to assess the impact of low and high PEEP in both supine and prone positions on lung function. The research will also explore the relationship between changes in ventilation-perfusion patterns and the lung's ability to be recruited for better oxygenation. Participants will undergo controlled ventilation while being monitored for various respiratory and hemodynamic parameters.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, this study could lead to improved ventilation strategies that enhance oxygenation and reduce lung injury in ARDS patients.
How similar studies have gone: While the specific approach of this study may be novel, previous studies have shown that optimizing PEEP and body position can improve outcomes in ARDS patients.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: 1. age ≥18 years 2. Moderate-to-severe ARDS as per the 2023 ESICM definition 3. Undergoing invasive mechanical ventilation 4. Planned prone position based on the attending physicians' decisions 5. Signed informed consent Exclusion Criteria: 1. age ≥85 years 2. Pregnancy 3. Severe hemodynamic instability (\> 30% increase in vasopressors in the last 6 hours or norepinephrine \> 0.5 µg/kg/min) 4. Clinically suspected elevated intracranial pressure (\>18 mm Hg) 5. Bronchopleural fistula 6. Contraindication to EIT monitoring (e.g. burns, pacemaker, thoracic wounds limiting electrode belt placement) 7. Severe hypernatremia (\>170mmol/L) 8. Re-admission of patients already enrolled in this study, or patients who are participating in other studies
Where it's running
-
Zhongda Hospital, Southeast University
Nanjing, Jiangsu, China Recruiting
Study contacts
- Study coordinator: Fengmei Guo, PhD, MD
- Email: fmguo2022@163.com
- Phone: +8613813841261
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Pulse Wave vs Saline Bolus EIT to measure lung perfusion in ARDS
This study tests whether pulse wave EIT or saline bolus EIT can best show lung blood flow in ARDS patients on mechanical ventilation.
-
Computed inspiratory muscle pressure to monitor inspiratory effort during pressure-targeted assist/control ventilation
This study tests a noninvasive computed pressure method (cPmus) to see if it matches the traditional esophageal pressure method for measuring inspiratory effort in adults on pressure-targeted ventilation with spontaneous breathing.
-
Noninvasive estimate of inspiratory effort to monitor pressure support ventilation
This study tests whether a noninvasive computed inspiratory muscle pressure (cPmus) can match the traditional esophageal pressure method for adults on pressure support ventilation.
-
Driving pressure-guided individualized PEEP vs standard PEEP during upper abdominal surgery
In this randomized trial, adults at higher risk of breathing problems after upper abdominal surgery will try a personalized PEEP level based on the lowest driving pressure and compare it to a fixed PEEP of 5 cmH2O to see if it lowers postoperative lung complications.
-
Inspiratory Effort and Dyspnea During Assisted Mechanical Ventilation in Critically Ill Adults
This study tests how different patient breathing efforts relate to breathlessness in adults on assisted mechanical ventilation.
-
FCV vs VC—Obese Adults Undergoing Laparoscopic Surgery
In obese adults having laparoscopic surgery, researchers will see if flow-controlled ventilation (FCV) works better than volume-controlled ventilation with autoflow (VC-AF) at keeping airway pressures and lung energy lower.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.