Pelashield vs Xeroform for donor-site dressings in skin graft patients
Official title: A Prospective Randomized Split-Site Study of Donor-Site Pain and Appearance Following Pelashield TM Versus Xeroform
Run by Wake Forest University Health Sciences · NCT07734519 · Data updated 2026-11-12
A randomized, patient-treated trial tests whether Pelashield, a new skin graft dressing, can better control pain and improve donor-site appearance compared with the standard Xeroform in split-thickness skin grafts.
Quick facts
| Phase | Phase 4 |
|---|---|
| Study type | Interventional |
| Ages | 18 Years and up |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 40 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Wake Forest University Health Sciences Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Winston-Salem, North Carolina) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | September 30, 2026 |
| Main results expected | July 2027 |
| Study ends | July 2027 |
| Registry record updated | October 1, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT07734519 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Adults undergoing split-thickness skin graft harvest with donor sites large enough to be divided into two comparable halves and suitable for standardized photography.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients whose donor sites do not respond to the dressing or have unrelated complications may not experience benefit.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This Phase 4 trial compares Pelashield to Xeroform for donor-site dressings in patients undergoing split-thickness skin grafts. Each participant acts as their own control, receiving Pelashield on one half of the donor site and Xeroform on the other half, with blinding of the patient and blinded outcome assessors. The study evaluates pain outcomes and donor-site appearance during early healing, using standardized photography and follow-up visits. Eligible participants must have donor sites large enough for two comparable halves and be able to comply with the protocol. The trial is conducted at a single center under Wake Forest University Health Sciences with Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist as the site.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, Pelashield could reduce donor-site pain and improve healing, potentially enabling easier outpatient management.
How similar studies have gone: Similar dressings with antimicrobial and analgesic features have shown promise in other wound settings, but this specific dual-half, blinded design is novel for this indication.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Undergoing split-thickness skin graft harvest, with a donor site sufficiently large to allow division into two comparable halves for randomized dressing application. * Donor site located in an area amenable to standardized photography and serial appearance assessment. * Ability to provide informed consent. * Willingness and ability to participate in scheduled follow-up visits for donor-site assessment, including standardized photography. * Donor-site management expected to follow the standardized study dressing protocol for the duration of the early healing period. Exclusion Criteria: * Inability, or anticipated inability, to reliably report pain within 1hour (or in recovery room) after surgery * Known allergy or hypersensitivity to lidocaine, silver-containing dressings, or other components of the study dressings. * Donor sites that are too small, irregularly shaped, or anatomically unsuitable to allow division into two comparable treatment halves. * Pre-existing skin disease at or adjacent to the donor-site region that may affect wound healing or scar appearance * Clinical situations in which the treating surgeon anticipates that protocol-based donor-site care cannot be maintained, including cases requiring non-standard dressings or adjunctive local therapies. * Anticipated inability to complete follow-up assessments, including inability to obtain evaluable standardized photographs at key time points. * Severe uncontrolled systemic conditions likely to significantly impair wound healing, at the discretion of the investigator (e.g., severe immunosuppression or other conditions making reliable donor-site healing unlikely). * Allergy to any local anesthetic * Allergy or sensitivity to silver * Pregnancy
Where it's running
-
Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States Recruiting
Study contacts
- Principal investigator: John K. Bailey, MD — Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist
- Study coordinator: D'Ann Hershel
- Email: dann.hershel@advocatehealth.org
- Phone: 336-716-1659
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Using skin grafts to detect kidney transplant rejection
This study tests whether skin grafts from kidney donors can help doctors spot early signs of kidney transplant rejection in patients.
-
Comparing two suturing techniques for skin grafts
This study is testing whether a new way of stitching skin grafts looks just as good as the traditional method by comparing the results on the same person's scars.
-
Lower leg skin grafts after tumour removal: does negative pressure dressings help or not?
This trial tests whether negative pressure wound therapy over split-thickness skin grafts on the lower leg reduces infection compared with traditional dressings in adults after skin tumour removal.
-
Aloe vera gel versus paraffin tulle dressings for donor-site pain after split-thickness skin grafts
This trial tests whether Aloe vera gel dressings reduce pain more than paraffin tulle dressings for adults (18–60) after split-thickness skin graft donor-site wounds.
-
Comparing tranexamic acid and thrombin for skin grafts in burn patients
This study is testing whether using tranexamic acid instead of thrombin can help burn patients have better skin grafts by reducing swelling at the wound site.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.