Pectopexy vs Sacrocolpopexy for apical prolapse: learning curve and effectiveness
Official title: Comparison of the Effectiveness and Learning Curve of Laparoscopic Pectopexy Versus Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy in Treatment of Apical Prolapse
Run by Ain Shams University · NCT07596498 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This study tests whether laparoscopic pectopexy works as well as laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for apical prolapse and how quickly surgeons become proficient.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 40 Years to 75 Years |
| Sex | Women only |
| Enrollment | 30 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Ain Shams University Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Cairo, Abbasia) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | April 1, 2026 |
| Main results expected | October 1, 2026 |
| Study ends | October 10, 2026 |
| Registry record updated | May 19, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT07596498 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Women with uterine or vault prolapse requiring surgery and POP-Q stage III or higher at Ain Shams University Hospital.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients with isolated anterior or posterior prolapse, pregnancy or lactation, or significant comorbidities may not benefit from these procedures.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This prospective randomized trial compares two laparoscopic surgeries for apical pelvic organ prolapse: pectopexy using the iliopectineal ligament versus sacrocolpopexy at Ain Shams University Hospital. The study looks at surgical success and the learning curve for the two techniques, aiming to determine if pectopexy can provide comparable outcomes with potentially easier adoption. Participants have uterine or vault prolapse corresponding to POP-Q stage III or higher, and those with major contraindications or pregnancy-related conditions are excluded. Outcomes likely include anatomical correction, perioperative safety, and recovery factors, with follow-up to assess durability of repair. Prior evidence is largely retrospective; this trial adds prospective randomized data on effectiveness and surgeon learning curves.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, the trial could support broader use of pectopexy, potentially reducing operative difficulty and complication risk while preserving or improving prolapse correction.
How similar studies have gone: Previous studies suggesting high success for sacrocolpopexy are largely retrospective; this trial contributes randomized data on pectopexy.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Patients diagnosed with uterine prolapse with POP-Q stage ≥ III. * Patients diagnosed with vault vaginal prolapse with POP-Q stage ≥ III. Exclusion Criteria: * Patients who refuse to participate in the study. * Patients who have isolated anterior or posterior vaginal wall prolapse. * Women who are pregnant or lactating. * Patients with severe comorbidities, including: Serious heart, liver, kidney, or blood diseases or any condition preventing them from tolerating surgery. * Women with a desire to conceive.
Where it's running
-
Ain Shams University Hospital
Cairo, Abbasia, Egypt Recruiting
Study contacts
- Study coordinator: Rafael Elkess Gabriel William, Resident
- Email: rafailogebrael@gmail.com
- Phone: +201223657844
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Using synthetic glue for mesh fixation in laparoscopic surgery for pelvic organ prolapse
This study is testing if a special glue can help fix mesh faster during surgery for pelvic organ prolapse, making the procedure easier and safer for patients.
-
NAVA use in preterm neonates with respiratory distress syndrome
This trial tests whether neurally adjusted ventilatory assist (NAVA) helps preterm babies with respiratory distress syndrome breathe more easily than conventional ventilation.
-
Ruta C and Vitamin C in Sepsis: Adding antioxidants to standard care
This trial tests whether adding Ruta C (rutin plus vitamin C) or vitamin C alone to standard sepsis treatment helps adults in the ICU stay shorter and recover better.
-
Left DLPFC rTMS vs iTBS for emotional dysregulation, impulsivity, and NSSI in Borderline Personality Disorder
This trial tests whether high-frequency rTMS or intermittent theta-burst stimulation over the left DLPFC can help reduce emotional instability, impulsivity, and non-suicidal self-injury in adults with Borderline Personality Disorder.
-
Trimetazidine as an extra therapy for aluminum phosphide poisoning
In this pilot trial, adults with acute aluminum phosphide poisoning receive standard care plus trimetazidine to see if it helps save lives and improve recovery.
-
Comparing 3D Face Scans with Manual Measurements for Vertical Dimension in People with Complete Dentures
This study tests whether a 3D face scan can reliably measure the vertical dimension of occlusion in people who wear complete dentures, compared with traditional manual methods.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.