Modified Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy vs Mirror Therapy for children with spastic hemiplegic cerebral palsy
Official title: A Randomized Controlled Trial to Compare the Effectiveness of Modified Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy Versus Mirror Therapy on Grip Strength, Manual Dexterity, and Spasticity in Children With Spastic Hemiplegic Cerebral Palsy
Run by Ibadat International University, Islamabad · NCT07747974 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This trial tests whether a modified constraint-induced movement therapy helps improve hand function better than mirror therapy in children aged 5–9 with spastic hemiplegic cerebral palsy.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 5 Years to 9 Years |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 42 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Ibadat International University, Islamabad Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Islamabad) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | March 3, 2026 |
| Main results expected | August 30, 2026 |
| Study ends | September 30, 2026 |
| Registry record updated | August 10, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT07747974 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Ideal candidates are children aged 5–9 with spastic hemiplegic cerebral palsy, mild to moderate spasticity (Modified Ashworth Scale 1 or 1+), and the ability to understand and follow commands.
✕Probably not a fit
Children with severe hand deformities, cognitive or visual impairments, uncontrolled seizures, or prior upper-limb surgery may receive less or no benefit.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This randomized controlled trial compares Modified Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy (MCIMT) to Mirror Therapy in children with spastic hemiplegic cerebral palsy to improve upper limb function. Forty-two participants, aged 5 to 9, are randomly assigned to either MCIMT or Mirror Therapy for 30 minutes a day, five days a week, over six weeks. Outcomes include grip strength, manual dexterity, and spasticity, measured before and after the intervention. The study uses a parallel-group design, with standardized assessments and statistical analysis to determine relative effectiveness. Conducted at Ibadat International University in Islamabad, the trial follows ethical approval and informed consent procedures.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, the more effective therapy could lead to better hand function and independence in daily activities for children with this form of cerebral palsy.
How similar studies have gone: Previous pediatric rehabilitation studies suggest that both MCIMT and mirror therapy can improve upper limb function, but direct head-to-head evidence in this age group is limited.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Children aged 5-9 years. * Male and female participants. * Diagnosed with spastic hemiplegic cerebral palsy. * Modified Ashworth Scale Grade 1 or 1+. * Able to understand and follow verbal commands. Exclusion Criteria: * Severe fixed hand deformity. * Cognitive impairment. * Severe visual impairment. * Uncontrolled seizures. * Previous upper limb surgery.
Where it's running
-
Ibadat International University
Islamabad, Pakistan Recruiting
Study contacts
- Study coordinator: Hafsah Arshad, Phd*
- Email: hafsah.arshad@uipt.iiui.edu.pk
- Phone: 03315165234
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Lower-extremity constraint therapy to improve walking in children with hemiplegic CP
This study tests modified constraint-induced movement therapy for improving how children with spastic hemiplegic cerebral palsy walk.
-
Lower limb proprioceptive training with core exercises vs. with proprioceptive training alone for balance after stroke
This trial tests whether adding core stability work to lower limb PNF improves balance and mobility in chronic stroke survivors.
-
Effective repositioning maneuvers for dizziness after stroke
This study tests whether the Epley maneuver works better or worse than the Semont maneuver for reducing dizziness and improving balance in stroke survivors with posterior canal BPPV.
-
Pressure vs Visual Biofeedback Training for Forward Head Posture
This study tests whether pressure biofeedback or visual biofeedback training can reduce neck pain and disability in adults with forward head posture.
-
Mulligan Mobilization With Movement for improving ankle movement in type 2 diabetes
This study tests whether Mulligan Mobilization with Movement can improve ankle motion, mobility, pain, and quality of life in people with type 2 diabetes who have limited ankle dorsiflexion.
-
How two hand-held massage methods compare for trapezius neck pain
In adults with trapezius myalgia, this study tests whether instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization (IASTM) or deep transverse friction massage (DTFM) provides better pain relief and function when added to standard physiotherapy.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.