Mulligan Mobilization With Movement for improving ankle movement in type 2 diabetes
Official title: Comparative Effects of Mulligan Mobilization With Movement and Conventional Physiotherapy on Ankle Range of Motion, Mobility, Pain, and Quality of Life in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Run by Ibadat International University, Islamabad · NCT07827625 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This study tests whether Mulligan Mobilization with Movement can improve ankle motion, mobility, pain, and quality of life in people with type 2 diabetes who have limited ankle dorsiflexion.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 50 Years to 70 Years |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 56 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Ibadat International University, Islamabad Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Islamabad, Federal) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | March 2, 2026 |
| Main results expected | September 30, 2026 |
| Study ends | October 5, 2026 |
| Registry record updated | September 18, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT07827625 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Ideal candidates are adults 50–70 with type 2 diabetes of at least five years, ankle dorsiflexion ≤10°, and moderate pain (NPRS 3–7).
✕Probably not a fit
Patients without significant ankle stiffness or pain, or those with active foot ulcers or neuropathy, may not experience benefit.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
In people with type 2 diabetes, restricted ankle movement can worsen pain and daily function. The trial compares Mulligan Mobilization with Movement to conventional physiotherapy to see which approach better improves ankle dorsiflexion, overall mobility, pain levels, and quality of life. Eligible participants are adults aged 50–70 with diabetes for at least five years and limited ankle motion. The intervention involves active weight-bearing dorsiflexion with a sustained posterior glide to correct ankle positioning. Outcomes focus on changes in range of motion, pain scores, gait-related mobility, and perceived quality of life.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, participants may experience improved ankle motion, reduced pain, and better daily function and quality of life.
How similar studies have gone: Existing literature suggests MWM can benefit ankle mobility in various populations, but its effectiveness specifically in adults with diabetes requires confirmation.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Patients aged 50-70 years * Both male and female * Diabetes Mellitus \> 5 years' duration * Willing to participate and provide informed consent * Pain rated between 3-7 on the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) * Ankle dorsiflexion range of motion ≤10° on goniometric assessment Exclusion Criteria: * History of recent lower-limb surgery, fracture, or dislocation (\<6 months) * Active diabetic foot ulcer or Charcot foot * Any inflammatory joint disease (e.g., rheumatoid arthritis) * Congenital foot deformity * Diagnosed diabetic peripheral neuropathy
Where it's running
-
Ibadat International University
Islamabad, Federal, Pakistan Recruiting
Study contacts
- Principal investigator: Hafsah Arshad, PhD — Ibadat International University, Islamabad
- Study coordinator: Nazish Jahangir, Master in MSK
- Email: Nazishjehanger@gmail.com
- Phone: 03125319484
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Ultrasound-Guided Thoracolumbar Fascia Injection for Chronic Low Back Pain in Type 2 Diabetes
This trial tests whether an ultrasound-guided injection into the thoracolumbar fascia, added to standard care, helps reduce chronic low back pain in adults with type 2 diabetes.
-
Lower limb proprioceptive training with core exercises vs. with proprioceptive training alone for balance after stroke
This trial tests whether adding core stability work to lower limb PNF improves balance and mobility in chronic stroke survivors.
-
Effective repositioning maneuvers for dizziness after stroke
This study tests whether the Epley maneuver works better or worse than the Semont maneuver for reducing dizziness and improving balance in stroke survivors with posterior canal BPPV.
-
Pressure vs Visual Biofeedback Training for Forward Head Posture
This study tests whether pressure biofeedback or visual biofeedback training can reduce neck pain and disability in adults with forward head posture.
-
How two hand-held massage methods compare for trapezius neck pain
In adults with trapezius myalgia, this study tests whether instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization (IASTM) or deep transverse friction massage (DTFM) provides better pain relief and function when added to standard physiotherapy.
-
Kaltenborn vs Maitland Mobilization for Cervicogenic Headache
This trial tests whether Kaltenborn mobilization helps people with cervicogenic headache more than Maitland mobilization.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.