Clinical trial Recruiting at 14 sites Interventional Ages 18 and up

MITRAL II Pivotal: Transcatheter mitral valve replacement for severe mitral annular calcification

Official title: The Safety and Effectiveness of the Edwards SAPIEN 3, SAPIEN 3 Ultra, and SAPIEN 3 Ultra RESILIA (SAPIEN 3/Ultra/RESILIA) Valve in Patients With Symptomatic Severe Calcific Mitral Valve Disease With Severe Mitral Annular Calcification Who Are Not Candidates for Standard Mitral Valve Surgery.

Run by Mayo Clinic · NCT04408430 · Data updated 2026-11-12

This trial tests whether placing an Edwards SAPIEN transcatheter valve through a transseptal approach helps high-surgical-risk adults with severe mitral annular calcification and symptomatic mitral valve dysfunction.

More Mitral Regurgitation trials

Quick facts

Study typeInterventional
Ages18 Years and up
SexAll
Enrollment210 (estimated)
SponsorMayo Clinic
Academic / other
Locations17 sites (Gilbert, Arizona and 16 other locations)
StatusRecruiting
StartedMarch 8, 2021
Main results expectedDecember 2026
Study endsDecember 2030
Registry record updatedJanuary 13, 2026
Trial IDNCT04408430 on ClinicalTrials.gov

Is this trial a fit for you?

Likely a good fit

Ideal candidates are adults with severe mitral annular calcification and symptomatic mitral valve dysfunction (severe stenosis or ≥ moderate regurgitation) who are judged high or prohibitive surgical risk and meet anatomical criteria for a transseptal ViMAC procedure.

Probably not a fit

Patients who have anatomy unsuitable for a transseptal valve-in-MAC approach, who are good candidates for standard surgery, or who have had procedures that affect outcomes (e.g., prior septal ablation) may not benefit from the intervention arm.

A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.

What this trial studies

This is a prospective, multicenter study enrolling high surgical risk adults with severe mitral annular calcification and symptomatic mitral stenosis, regurgitation, or mixed disease. The treatment arm (Transseptal Valve-in-MAC) uses Edwards SAPIEN 3 / SAPIEN 3 Ultra / SAPIEN 3 Ultra RESILIA valves delivered via a transseptal Commander system, while a Natural History Registry will follow medically managed patients who meet inclusion criteria but are anatomically ineligible for the transseptal procedure. Planned enrollment is about 110 patients in the ViMAC treatment arm and up to 100 in the medically treated registry, with eligibility determined by a multidisciplinary heart team and specific imaging and clinical criteria (e.g., MVA ≤ 1.5 cm2, ≥ moderate to severe MR, NYHA class II or worse). The study focuses on safety and effectiveness outcomes in a population not considered candidates for standard mitral valve surgery.

Why it matters

Potential benefit: If successful, the approach could offer a less invasive option that reduces symptoms and improves valve function for patients who are poor candidates for open mitral surgery.

How similar studies have gone: Early case series and registries of transcatheter mitral valve replacement in MAC have shown feasibility but variable outcomes and higher complication rates compared with valve-in-valve procedures, so the approach is promising but not yet well established.

Who can join: the full rules

Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria:

All Candidates must meet the following criteria:

1. \- 18 years of age or older
2. -Severe mitral annular calcification with symptomatic mitral valve dysfunction including severe mitral stenosis defined as mitral valve area (MVA) of ≤1.5 cm2, or ≥ moderate to severe mitral regurgitation, or mixed ≥ moderated stenosis and ≥ moderate regurgitation. For this study, the severity of mitral regurgitation will be graded according to the 2017 American Society of Echocardiography Guidelines: None, Trivial, Mild 1(+), Moderate 2(+), Moderate to severe 3(+), and severe 4(+).
3. \- NYHA Functional Class ≥II.
4. The heart team agrees that valve implantation will likely benefit the patient.
5. High or prohibitive risk for standard mitral valve surgery as determined by the heart team (at least one site cardiac surgeon must personally examine the subject to determine operative risk in patients presented for inclusion to ViMAC arm). NOTE: Patients not interested in mitral intervention or who are being considered for inclusion in the Natural History of Disease Registry are not required to be evaluated in person by a surgeon.)
6. The study patient has been informed of the nature of the study, agrees to its provisions and has provided written informed consent as approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of the respective clinical site.
7. The study patient agrees to comply with all required post-procedure follow-up visits including annual visits through 5 years.

Exclusion Criteria for ViMAC subjects (does not apply to the Natural History of Disease Registry):

1. \- The heart team considers the patient is a surgical candidate.
2. \- Mitral annulus is not severely calcified.
3. \- Myocardial infarction requiring revascularization within 30 days from procedure.
4. \- Clinically significant untreated coronary artery disease requiring revascularization.
5. Any therapeutic invasive cardiac procedure resulting in a permanent implant that is performed within 30 days of the index procedure (unless part of planned strategy for treatment of concomitant coronary artery disease). Implantation of a permanent pacemaker is not exclusionary.
6. Any patient with a balloon valvuloplasty (BMV) within 30 days of the procedure (unless BMV is a bridge to ViMAC procedure after a qualifying Echo).
7. Severe symptomatic tricuspid regurgitation (hepatic dysfunction, ascites, edema not controlled with diuretics) requiring surgery.
8. Leukopenia (WBC \< 3000 cell/mL), acute anemia (Hgb \< 9 g/dL), Thrombocytopenia (Platelets \< 50,000 cell/mL), history of coagulopathy or hypercoagulable state.
9. Hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (HOCM) with mean LVOT gradient of ≥20 mm Hg at rest or ≥50 mmHg with Valsalva.
10. Hemodynamic or respiratory instability requiring inotropic support, mechanical ventilation or mechanical heart assistance within 30 days of screening evaluation.
11. Need for emergency surgery for any reason.
12. Severe left ventricular dysfunction with LVEF \< 20%.
13. Echocardiographic evidence of intracardiac mass, thrombus or vegetation.
14. Active upper GI bleeding within 90 days prior to procedure.
15. A known contraindication or hypersensitivity to all anticoagulation regimens, or inability to be anticoagulated for the study procedure.
16. Cardiac anatomy that would preclude appropriate delivery and deployment of an Edwards SAPIEN 3/Ultra/RESILIA valve in MAC via transseptal access, including but not limited to:

    * Native neo mitral annulus size \< 275 mm2 or \> 810 mm2 as measured by CT scan.
    * Significant risk of LVOT obstruction or valve embolization as assessed by CT core lab
17. Clinically (by neurologist) or neuroimaging confirmed stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) within 90 days of the procedure.
18. Estimated life expectancy \<12 months due to non-cardiac conditions.
19. Expectation that patient will not improve despite treatment of mitral valve dysfunction.
20. Active bacterial endocarditis within 180 days of procedure.
21. \- Severe right ventricular dysfunction as assessed by Echo core lab
22. \- Active infection requiring antibiotic therapy (subject may be a candidate after 2 weeks of antibiotic discontinuation.
23. \- Female who is pregnant or lactating.
24. \- Participating in another investigational device study.
25. \- Aortic valve disease requiring intervention. If aortic valve intervention is required, the AVR procedure should be performed first and if the patient remains symptomatic after AVR, may be presented for consideration for inclusion in this trial.
26. \- Severe fixed pulmonary hypertension (PASP ≥70 mmHg and more than 2/3 of the systemic systolic blood pressure).
27. \- Severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease requiring continuous home oxygen.
28. \- The patient refuses mitral valve intervention
29. \- Recent symptomatic COVID-19 infection with residual symptoms that may affect the outcomes of this trial.

Where it's running

  • Dignity Health Chandler Regional Medical Center
    Gilbert, Arizona, United States
    Recruiting
  • Banner - University Medicine Cardiology Clinic
    Phoenix, Arizona, United States
    Recruiting
  • Pima Heart & Vascular
    Tucson, Arizona, United States
    Recruiting
  • Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
    Los Angeles, California, United States
    Recruiting
  • Sutter Health
    San Francisco, California, United States
    Recruiting
  • Medstar Washington Hospital Center
    Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States
    Recruiting
Show 11 more locations
  • Massachusetts General Hospital
    Boston, Massachusetts, United States
    Recruiting
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital
    Boston, Massachusetts, United States
    Recruiting
  • Columbia University Medical Center/NYPH
    New York, New York, United States
    Recruiting
  • Oklahoma Heart Institute Utica Office
    Tulsa, Oklahoma, United States
    Recruiting
  • Oregon Health & Science University
    Portland, Oregon, United States
    Recruiting
  • University Health
    San Antonio, Texas, United States
    Recruiting
  • Intermountain Medical Center
    Murray, Utah, United States
    Recruiting
  • Ignacio Chávez National Institute of Cardiology
    Mexico City, Mexico
    Recruiting
  • Uchealth Heart & Vascular Clinic Harmony Campus
    Fort Collins, Colorado, United States
    Active not recruiting
  • Mayo Clinic
    Rochester, Minnesota, United States
    Active not recruiting
  • The Sentara Heart Valve and Structural Disease Center
    Norfolk, Virginia, United States
    Active not recruiting

Study contacts

Similar studies

Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.

  • Surgical implantation of a polymer prosthetic mitral or aortic valve

    This will test a surgically implanted polymer heart valve to see if it is safe and works well for adults who need mitral or aortic valve replacement.

    Recruiting Mitrassist Lifesciences Limited Co., Ltd. · Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality · NCT07097740

  • Abbott Cephea registry for mitral valve disease

    Collects clinical information on adults with symptomatic mitral valve disease to see how correcting the valve with the Cephea system affects outcomes for patients who might be candidates for transcatheter mitral valve replacement.

    Recruiting at 24 sites Abbott Medical Devices · Birmingham, Alabama and 23 other locations · NCT07069673

  • Registry for optimal treatment options for mitral valve issues

    This study looks at how well different treatments work for people with serious mitral valve problems, comparing those who had a new valve implanted to those who weren't able to get that treatment.

    Recruiting at 43 sites Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf · Tucson, Arizona and 42 other locations · NCT04688190

  • Mitral Valve Calcification Imaging with TrueVue 3D Light Rendering

    This study tests how well three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography with TrueVue transillumination detects mitral valve calcifications compared with CT in adults.

    Recruiting Centro Cardiologico Monzino · Milan, Milan · NCT07612553

  • Left atrial shunt to help after mitral valve surgery

    This study tests whether making a small opening between the left and right atria during mitral valve repair can relieve high left atrial pressure for adults with primary mitral regurgitation.

    Recruiting Ottawa Heart Institute Research Corporation · Ottawa, Ontario · NCT06547788

  • Observational registry for patients treated with the NeoChord Artificial Chordae System

    This study is looking at how well the NeoChord Artificial Chordae System works for people with degenerative mitral valve disease over five years, without needing any extra procedures beyond regular treatment.

    Recruiting at 5 sites NeoChord · Bonn and 4 other locations · NCT04190602

How to take part

  1. Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
  2. Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
  3. Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.
Last reviewed 2026-11-14 by the Find a Trial editorial team. Information on this page is for educational purposes and is not medical advice. Always consult qualified healthcare professionals about clinical trial participation.