Longitudinal versus transverse A1 pulley incision for trigger finger
Official title: Incision Decision: A Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing Longitudinal vs. Transverse A1 Pulley Release Outcomes
Run by Washington University School of Medicine · NCT07516652 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This trial will test whether a straight (longitudinal) or a crease-based (transverse) skin incision leads to better hand function, less pain, and improved scarring after open A1 pulley release in adults with trigger finger.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years and up |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 200 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Washington University School of Medicine Academic / other |
| Locations | 2 sites (Chicago, Illinois and 1 other locations) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | April 1, 2026 |
| Main results expected | April 1, 2027 |
| Study ends | March 30, 2028 |
| Registry record updated | April 8, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT07516652 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Adults aged 18 or older with primary trigger finger of a finger (not the thumb) who are indicated for open A1 pulley release and can give informed consent are ideal candidates.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients needing revision or who have had previous surgery on the affected finger, those with trigger thumb, or those unable to undergo surgery or follow-up at the study sites are unlikely to benefit from this trial.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This is a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial comparing two skin incision techniques for open A1 pulley release in adults with idiopathic trigger finger (excluding the thumb). Participants are randomly assigned to either a longitudinal incision along the finger or a transverse incision in the distal palmar crease, and outcomes are measured using clinical exams and patient-reported metrics. The primary outcome is hand function at six weeks after surgery, with secondary outcomes including pain, scar healing, return to normal activities, and patient satisfaction. Sites include Washington University/Barnes-Jewish Orthopedic Center in St. Louis and The University of Chicago Medicine in Chicago.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, the preferred incision could improve postoperative hand function, reduce pain and problematic scarring, and speed return to normal activities after trigger finger surgery.
How similar studies have gone: Prior reports are mostly observational or surgeon-preference series with limited randomized data, so a direct randomized comparison of incision type remains relatively untested.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Adult patients (age ≥ 18 years) * Diagnosed with trigger finger (stenosing tenosynovitis) of a finger (excluding the thumb) * Written informed consent obtained Exclusion Criteria: * Revision surgery * Previous surgery on the affected finger * Patients refusing consent
Where it's running
-
The University of Chicago Medicine
Chicago, Illinois, United States Recruiting -
Washington University and Barnes-Jewish Orthopedic Center
St Louis, Missouri, United States Recruiting
Study contacts
- Principal investigator: Jason Strelzow, MD — Associate Professor, Orthopaedic Surgery Division of Hand and Microsurgery, Washington University in St Louis
- Study coordinator: Nisha N Kale, MD
- Email: kale.n@wustl.edu
- Phone: 314-906-2072
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Low-Level Laser Therapy for Trigger Finger
This study tests whether low-level laser therapy can help people with trigger finger see if it reduces pain and improves finger movement.
-
Comparing treatments for Trigger Finger using shock wave therapy and splints
This study is testing whether shock wave therapy alone, shock wave therapy with splints, or just splints works best to relieve pain and improve function for people with Trigger Finger.
-
Betamethasone vs Dextrose Injections for Trigger Finger
This trial tests whether an ultrasound-guided betamethasone shot works better than a dextrose injection for people with trigger finger.
-
Comparing a finger splint, paraffin baths, and peloidotherapy for trigger finger
This tests whether a finger splint, paraffin baths, or peloidotherapy works best to reduce pain and catching in adults 18–75 with a single trigger finger.
-
Ultrasound-guided needle knife release for trigger finger treatment
This study is testing a new needle procedure using ultrasound to see if it can help people with trigger finger who haven't found relief from other treatments.
-
Treatment for trigger finger using a night orthosis after cortisone injection
This study tests if wearing a special night splint after a cortisone shot can help people with trigger finger feel better and use their hands more easily.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.