Laparoscopy vs Open Surgery for Endometrial Cancer Staging in Low-Resource Settings
Official title: Perioperative Outcomes of Surgical Staging in Patients With Early-stage Endometrial Carcinoma: Comparison Between Laparoscopy and Laparotomy in a Low-resource Setting
Run by Assiut University · NCT07546825 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This study tests whether laparoscopic surgical staging for early endometrial cancer leads to faster first ambulation compared with open surgery in low-resource settings.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Sex | Women only |
| Enrollment | 48 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Assiut University Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Asyut) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | June 2, 2026 |
| Main results expected | April 1, 2028 |
| Study ends | October 1, 2028 |
| Registry record updated | June 10, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT07546825 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Adults with histologically confirmed early-stage endometrial cancer eligible for total hysterectomy with or without pelvic lymphadenectomy and with ECOG 0-2.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients with advanced-stage disease, contraindications to laparoscopy, or those requiring extensive lymphadenectomy beyond the study scope may not benefit.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This interventional trial compares two surgical approaches for endometrial cancer staging: laparoscopic versus open (laparotomy). It focuses on early postoperative recovery, primarily time to ambulation, and also examines intraoperative metrics (operative time, blood loss, lymph node yield) and postoperative outcomes (complications, recovery quality, length of stay, same-day discharge). The study is set in a low-resource environment and aims to determine if minimally invasive surgery provides recovery and safety benefits without compromising oncologic adequacy. Eligibility includes confirmed endometrial carcinoma suitable for pelvic lymphadenectomy, good performance status, and informed consent. Exclusion criteria include advanced-stage disease, contraindications to laparoscopy, prior pelvic radiotherapy, or prior lymphadenectomy.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, patients may experience faster recovery and shorter hospital stays with laparoscopic staging without compromising cancer control.
How similar studies have gone: Prior data suggest laparoscopic staging can reduce morbidity and shorten recovery while preserving oncologic outcomes, though specific results in low-resource settings are limited.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
1. Inclusion criteria: * Histologically confirmed endometrial carcinoma, diagnosed by endometrial biopsy or dilatation and curettage. * patient candidate for pelvic lymphadenectomy according to risk stratification in endometrial cancer according to ESGO/ESTRO/ESP, 2021 (6). * Planned surgical staging including: total hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy ± pelvic lymphadenectomy. * good performance status : ECOG 0, 1, 2 * patients who provide informed written consent to participate in the study. 2. Exclusion criteria: * severe cardiopulmonary diseases (e.g unstable angina, severe COPD). * Absolute contraindication to laparoscopy. * stage Ⅲ and Ⅳ endometrial cancer. * patients who received previous pelvic radiotherapy. * patients who underwent prior lymphadenectomy.
Where it's running
-
Assiut University, Assiut,
Asyut, Egypt Recruiting
Study contacts
- Study coordinator: Alaa El-Din Mahmoud Ismail, professor
- Email: alaaismail@aun.edu.eg
- Phone: +201001106048
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Prehabilitation within ERAS for gynecologic oncology surgery
This trial tests whether a pre-surgery program of tailored exercise, immunonutrition (Ocoxin), breathing exercises and psychological support combined with ERAS helps people having gynecologic cancer surgery recover faster and with fewer complications.
-
Comparing two methods of ondansetron administration for pain relief after weight loss surgery
This study is testing whether giving ondansetron through a nerve block can help reduce pain and nausea after weight loss surgery just as well as the traditional intravenous method.
-
Lower versus standard abdominal gas pressure to reduce shoulder pain after gynecologic laparoscopy
This trial will test whether using lower gas pressure (10 mm Hg) instead of standard pressure (15 mm Hg) during benign gynecologic laparoscopic surgery reduces shoulder-tip pain afterwards.
-
Using low-thoracic epidural anesthesia for kidney removal surgery.
This study is testing if using low-thoracic epidural anesthesia during kidney removal surgery can help older and high-risk patients recover better and feel more satisfied compared to general anesthesia.
-
Comparing reduced port laparoscopic gastrectomy to traditional methods for gastric cancer
This study tests if a new way of doing stomach surgery with fewer small cuts is safer and works better for people with gastric cancer compared to the usual method.
-
Comparing two surgical methods for pancreatic cancer treatment
This study is testing if a less invasive surgery for pancreatic cancer works better than traditional surgery in helping patients live longer after treatment.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.