Comparing two methods of ondansetron administration for pain relief after weight loss surgery
Official title: Intravenous Versus Perineural Ondansetron as an Adjuvant in Autonomic Neural Blockade for Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: A Two-Center, Randomized, Double-Blind, Non-inferiority Trial
Run by Tanta University · NCT06810882 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This study is testing whether giving ondansetron through a nerve block can help reduce pain and nausea after weight loss surgery just as well as the traditional intravenous method.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years to 65 Years |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 482 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Tanta University Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Tanta, Gharbia Governorate) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | February 16, 2025 |
| Main results expected | February 16, 2027 |
| Study ends | February 17, 2027 |
| Registry record updated | May 15, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT06810882 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Ideal candidates are adults aged 18-65 with a BMI over 35 and associated comorbidities, scheduled for laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients with allergies to the study drugs, chronic pain disorders, or those with a history of gastrointestinal surgeries may not benefit from this study.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This prospective randomized non-inferiority study aims to evaluate the analgesic and anti-emetic effects of intravenous ondansetron versus perineural ondansetron in patients undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. The study focuses on addressing postoperative pain and nausea, which are common complications following bariatric surgery. By utilizing a novel approach called paragastric autonomic neural blockade, the researchers will assess the effectiveness of these two methods in managing symptoms post-surgery. The goal is to determine if perineural administration provides similar or superior benefits compared to the traditional intravenous route.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, this study could enhance postoperative care by reducing pain and nausea in patients undergoing weight loss surgery.
How similar studies have gone: Previous studies have shown promising results with similar approaches, indicating potential for effective pain and nausea management.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Patients of either sex * American Society Anesthesiologists physical (ASA) status II-III * age between 18-65 years old * Body mass index (BMI) \>35 kg/m2 with comorbidity or \> 40 kg/m2 -- undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy with intraoperative surgeon performed laparoscopic paragastric autonomic neural blockade.. Exclusion Criteria: * Allergy to experimental drugs. * Known to have long QT, previous history of postoperative nausea and vomiting * Abuse of alcohol, analgesia, or sedative antidepressant drugs * Chronic pain disorders * History of previous upper gastrointestinal system surgery, those with surgery-related complications during or after surgery. * Liver or kidney failure * Performance of concomitant procedures in addition to laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy * Anesthetic complications that may alter the postoperative management protocol.
Where it's running
-
Tanta University Hospitals
Tanta, Gharbia Governorate, Egypt Recruiting
Study contacts
- Study coordinator: Osama M Rehab, MD
- Email: osamarehab@med.tanta.edu.eg
- Phone: 01095210806
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Comparing reduced port laparoscopic gastrectomy to traditional methods for gastric cancer
This study tests if a new way of doing stomach surgery with fewer small cuts is safer and works better for people with gastric cancer compared to the usual method.
-
Routine antiemetic prophylaxis for non-fasted parturients having cesarean delivery with spinal anesthesia
This trial tests whether giving a preventive antiemetic approach (ondansetron or a metoclopramide) reduces intraoperative nausea and vomiting in non-fasted women having emergency cesarean sections under spinal anesthesia.
-
Laparoscopy vs Open Surgery for Endometrial Cancer Staging in Low-Resource Settings
This study tests whether laparoscopic surgical staging for early endometrial cancer leads to faster first ambulation compared with open surgery in low-resource settings.
-
International registry of robot-assisted minimally invasive surgery for gastric cancer
This registry will collect information to see how robot-assisted minimally invasive gastrectomy (RAMIG) works and how surgeons learn it for people having surgery for gastric cancer.
-
Comparing ondansetron lozenge versus IV ondansetron to prevent shivering during cesarean section
This test will see if an ondansetron lozenge or IV ondansetron works better to prevent shivering in women having cesarean sections with spinal anesthesia.
-
Ondansetron lozenge versus IV to prevent shivering after tonsil removal in children
This test will see if an ondansetron lozenge works as well as intravenous ondansetron to prevent shivering in children aged 4 to 15 having a tonsillectomy.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.