Clinical trial Recruiting at 1 site Interventional Ages 18 to 75

Laparoscopic vs Open Surgery for Colon Cancer in Patients with Visceral Obesity

Official title: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Laparoscopic Versus Open Surgery for Colon Cancer With Visceral Obesity

Run by Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University, School of Medicine · NCT07314996 · Data updated 2026-11-12

This study tests whether laparoscopic or open surgery leads to different long-term outcomes for adults with colon cancer and visceral obesity.

More Colonic Neoplasms trials

Quick facts

Study typeInterventional
Ages18 Years to 75 Years
SexAll
Enrollment664 (estimated)
SponsorSecond Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University, School of Medicine
Academic / other
Locations1 site (Hangzhou, Zhejiang)
StatusRecruiting
StartedJanuary 18, 2026
Main results expectedDecember 31, 2031
Study endsDecember 31, 2033
Registry record updatedJune 3, 2026
Trial IDNCT07314996 on ClinicalTrials.gov

Is this trial a fit for you?

Likely a good fit

Adults aged 18–75 with colon cancer, BMI-poor obesity indicated by Body Roundness Index (BRI) ≥ 5.0, resectable disease, and no prior anti-tumor therapy.

Probably not a fit

Patients with unresectable disease, distant metastasis, or contraindications to either surgical approach may not benefit.

A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.

What this trial studies

In this trial, adults with colon cancer and a Body Round Index indicating visceral obesity are randomized to either laparoscopic or open surgical resection. The study focuses on oncologic outcomes and aims to determine if the minimally invasive approach offers similar or superior long-term prognosis in this higher-risk population. Eligible patients have a resectable tumor without distant metastasis and meet specified clinical criteria, with outcomes assessed over time. Prior landmark trials suggested non-inferiority in lean patients, but data in obese populations remain limited, prompting this targeted comparison.

Why it matters

Potential benefit: If laparoscopic surgery proves non-inferior or superior, patients with visceral obesity could benefit from less invasiveness without compromising cancer control.

How similar studies have gone: Previous trials in non-obese patients showed non-inferiority of laparoscopy, but evidence in obese populations is limited and mixed.

Who can join: the full rules

Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria:

1. Body Roundness Index (BRI) ≥ 5.0, with no laparoscopic surgery contraindications as assessed by the surgeon;
2. Pathologically confirmed colon adenocarcinoma, mucinous adenocarcinoma, or signet ring cell carcinoma;
3. Tumor lower edge \> 12 cm from the anus as measured by colonoscopy, and the tumor lower edge not directly palpable by digital rectal examination;
4. Single primary lesion;
5. Aged 18 (inclusive) to 75 (inclusive) years;
6. Clinical stage T3/4Nany or T1-4N+ on chest non-contrast CT and abdominal enhanced CT, no distant metastasis, and resectable as judged by the surgeon;
7. Treatment-naive, no prior anti-tumor treatment;
8. Completed blood routine, liver and kidney function tests, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), and carbohydrate antigen 199 (CA199) before randomization, with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score ≤ III;
9. Patient able to understand the study protocol and willing to participate in the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Height and waist circumference data are unavailable;
2. Hereditary colorectal cancer (Lynch syndrome or Familial Adenomatous Polyposis \[FAP\]);
3. History of previous malignant neoplasm, with the exception of basal cell carcinoma/papillary thyroid carcinoma/various types of in situ cancers/micro-invasive early-stage lung cancer;
4. Acute exacerbation of major organ diseases (such as, but not limited to, COPD, coronary heart disease, and renal insufficiency) and/or severe acute infectious diseases (such as, but not limited to, hepatitis, pneumonia, and myocarditis);
5. The tumor presents with obstruction or is at high risk of obstruction, and/or there is bleeding and/or perforation, which may necessitate emergency surgery;
6. Pregnancy or breastfeeding;
7. Inability to undergo contrast-enhanced CT scan;
8. Additional surgery after EMR or ESD;
9. Patients with unremitted severe mental illness, moderate or above cognitive impairment (MMSE ≤ 23 points), or those who have been hospitalized due to mood disorders in the past year or have unstable antipsychotic medication;
10. Patients with enlarged mesenteric root lymph nodes detected by preoperative CT or intraoperative exploration and suspected metastasis, or suspected metastasis in organs such as peritoneum or liver detected by intraoperative exploration;
11. Patients with a history of major abdominal surgery and severe adhesions precluding laparoscopic surgery upon laparoscopic exploration.

Where it's running

  • Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine
    Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
    Recruiting

Study contacts

Similar studies

Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.

  • Improving mailed FIT screening in Appalachia

    This project will test whether changing the FIT kit materials and using phone versus text message navigation can help more average-risk adults in Appalachian counties complete colorectal cancer screening when they're overdue.

    Recruiting Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center · Columbus, Ohio · NCT07173985

  • Anti-mesothelin TNhYP218 CAR T cell therapy for mesothelin-expressing solid tumors

    This treatment will test whether a person's own engineered CAR T cells that target mesothelin can help adults with mesothelin-expressing solid tumors, including mesothelioma, that have returned or spread after standard therapy.

    Recruiting Phase 1 National Institutes of Health Clinical Center (CC) · Bethesda, Maryland · NCT06885697

  • Comparing European and Japanese methods for examining colon cancer

    This study is testing whether the way doctors in Japan check for colon cancer is as accurate as the method used in Europe for patients who have had surgery for colon cancer.

    Recruiting Phase 3 Russian Society of Colorectal Surgeons · Moscow · NCT06119867

  • Using AI to Improve Cost-Effectiveness of Colonoscopy Screening

    This study is testing whether using artificial intelligence during colonoscopies can help doctors tell the difference between harmful and harmless polyps, making screening for colon cancer more effective and affordable.

    Recruiting at 2 sites Istituto Clinico Humanitas · Rozzano, Milano and 1 other locations · NCT06041945

  • Platform program for evaluating treatments in metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer

    This study is testing different new treatments for people with advanced HER2-positive breast cancer to see which ones work best before moving them to larger trials.

    Recruiting at 5 sites Phase 1/2 QuantumLeap Healthcare Collaborative · Birmingham, Alabama and 9 other locations · NCT05868226

  • Evaluating dostarlimab for resectable colon cancer

    This study is testing if adding a new immunotherapy called dostarlimab to standard chemotherapy can help people with certain types of resectable colon cancer do better.

    Recruiting at 229 sites Phase 3 GlaxoSmithKline · Tucson, Arizona and 265 other locations · NCT05855200

How to take part

  1. Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
  2. Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
  3. Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.
Last reviewed 2026-11-14 by the Find a Trial editorial team. Information on this page is for educational purposes and is not medical advice. Always consult qualified healthcare professionals about clinical trial participation.