Laparoscopic vs Open Surgery for Colon Cancer in Patients with Visceral Obesity
Official title: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Laparoscopic Versus Open Surgery for Colon Cancer With Visceral Obesity
Run by Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University, School of Medicine · NCT07314996 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This study tests whether laparoscopic or open surgery leads to different long-term outcomes for adults with colon cancer and visceral obesity.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years to 75 Years |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 664 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University, School of Medicine Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Hangzhou, Zhejiang) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | January 18, 2026 |
| Main results expected | December 31, 2031 |
| Study ends | December 31, 2033 |
| Registry record updated | June 3, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT07314996 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Adults aged 18–75 with colon cancer, BMI-poor obesity indicated by Body Roundness Index (BRI) ≥ 5.0, resectable disease, and no prior anti-tumor therapy.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients with unresectable disease, distant metastasis, or contraindications to either surgical approach may not benefit.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
In this trial, adults with colon cancer and a Body Round Index indicating visceral obesity are randomized to either laparoscopic or open surgical resection. The study focuses on oncologic outcomes and aims to determine if the minimally invasive approach offers similar or superior long-term prognosis in this higher-risk population. Eligible patients have a resectable tumor without distant metastasis and meet specified clinical criteria, with outcomes assessed over time. Prior landmark trials suggested non-inferiority in lean patients, but data in obese populations remain limited, prompting this targeted comparison.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If laparoscopic surgery proves non-inferior or superior, patients with visceral obesity could benefit from less invasiveness without compromising cancer control.
How similar studies have gone: Previous trials in non-obese patients showed non-inferiority of laparoscopy, but evidence in obese populations is limited and mixed.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: 1. Body Roundness Index (BRI) ≥ 5.0, with no laparoscopic surgery contraindications as assessed by the surgeon; 2. Pathologically confirmed colon adenocarcinoma, mucinous adenocarcinoma, or signet ring cell carcinoma; 3. Tumor lower edge \> 12 cm from the anus as measured by colonoscopy, and the tumor lower edge not directly palpable by digital rectal examination; 4. Single primary lesion; 5. Aged 18 (inclusive) to 75 (inclusive) years; 6. Clinical stage T3/4Nany or T1-4N+ on chest non-contrast CT and abdominal enhanced CT, no distant metastasis, and resectable as judged by the surgeon; 7. Treatment-naive, no prior anti-tumor treatment; 8. Completed blood routine, liver and kidney function tests, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), and carbohydrate antigen 199 (CA199) before randomization, with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score ≤ III; 9. Patient able to understand the study protocol and willing to participate in the study. Exclusion Criteria: 1. Height and waist circumference data are unavailable; 2. Hereditary colorectal cancer (Lynch syndrome or Familial Adenomatous Polyposis \[FAP\]); 3. History of previous malignant neoplasm, with the exception of basal cell carcinoma/papillary thyroid carcinoma/various types of in situ cancers/micro-invasive early-stage lung cancer; 4. Acute exacerbation of major organ diseases (such as, but not limited to, COPD, coronary heart disease, and renal insufficiency) and/or severe acute infectious diseases (such as, but not limited to, hepatitis, pneumonia, and myocarditis); 5. The tumor presents with obstruction or is at high risk of obstruction, and/or there is bleeding and/or perforation, which may necessitate emergency surgery; 6. Pregnancy or breastfeeding; 7. Inability to undergo contrast-enhanced CT scan; 8. Additional surgery after EMR or ESD; 9. Patients with unremitted severe mental illness, moderate or above cognitive impairment (MMSE ≤ 23 points), or those who have been hospitalized due to mood disorders in the past year or have unstable antipsychotic medication; 10. Patients with enlarged mesenteric root lymph nodes detected by preoperative CT or intraoperative exploration and suspected metastasis, or suspected metastasis in organs such as peritoneum or liver detected by intraoperative exploration; 11. Patients with a history of major abdominal surgery and severe adhesions precluding laparoscopic surgery upon laparoscopic exploration.
Where it's running
-
Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China Recruiting
Study contacts
- Study coordinator: Jun Li, M.D.
- Email: 2307016@zju.edu.cn; lj6088@gmail.com
- Phone: +86 13777878061
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Improving mailed FIT screening in Appalachia
This project will test whether changing the FIT kit materials and using phone versus text message navigation can help more average-risk adults in Appalachian counties complete colorectal cancer screening when they're overdue.
-
Anti-mesothelin TNhYP218 CAR T cell therapy for mesothelin-expressing solid tumors
This treatment will test whether a person's own engineered CAR T cells that target mesothelin can help adults with mesothelin-expressing solid tumors, including mesothelioma, that have returned or spread after standard therapy.
-
Comparing European and Japanese methods for examining colon cancer
This study is testing whether the way doctors in Japan check for colon cancer is as accurate as the method used in Europe for patients who have had surgery for colon cancer.
-
Using AI to Improve Cost-Effectiveness of Colonoscopy Screening
This study is testing whether using artificial intelligence during colonoscopies can help doctors tell the difference between harmful and harmless polyps, making screening for colon cancer more effective and affordable.
-
Platform program for evaluating treatments in metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer
This study is testing different new treatments for people with advanced HER2-positive breast cancer to see which ones work best before moving them to larger trials.
-
Evaluating dostarlimab for resectable colon cancer
This study is testing if adding a new immunotherapy called dostarlimab to standard chemotherapy can help people with certain types of resectable colon cancer do better.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.