J-VALVE versus surgical aortic valve replacement for severe aortic regurgitation
Official title: J-VALVE Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement for Patients With Aortic Regurgitation Therapy
Run by Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University, School of Medicine · NCT07453407 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This study will test whether the J‑VALVE transfemoral valve works as well and is as safe as surgical aortic valve replacement in people aged 65 and older with severe native aortic regurgitation.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 65 Years and up |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 1250 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University, School of Medicine Academic / other |
| Drugs / interventions | radiation |
| Locations | 28 sites (Hefei, Anhui and 27 other locations) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | March 5, 2026 |
| Main results expected | March 2029 |
| Study ends | March 2038 |
| Registry record updated | August 12, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT07453407 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
People age 65 or older with severe (≥3+) native aortic regurgitation who are symptomatic or have guideline-based evidence of LV impairment and who are judged suitable for either transcatheter or surgical valve replacement by a heart team.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients with mild-to-moderate AR, anatomy that precludes transfemoral TAVR, active contraindications to surgery or transcatheter procedures, or other major comorbidities are unlikely to benefit from this comparison.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This randomized interventional trial compares the J‑VALVE transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve system to standard surgical biological aortic valve replacement in patients with grade ≥3+ native aortic regurgitation. Eligible patients are elderly (≥65) symptomatic or selected asymptomatic patients with evidence of left ventricular dysfunction, and must be judged suitable for both procedures by a multidisciplinary heart team. Procedures and follow-up are performed at high-volume cardiac centers in China with core-lab imaging review to determine valve performance and safety outcomes. The primary focus is on procedural safety and valve effectiveness over scheduled post-procedure follow-up visits.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, the J‑VALVE could offer a less invasive option than open-heart surgery with similar valve performance and quicker recovery.
How similar studies have gone: While transcatheter valves have revolutionized treatment of aortic stenosis and small series/registries show some transcatheter systems can treat native AR, randomized head-to-head data versus surgery are still limited.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * 1\) Age ≥65 years; * 2\) a. Symptomatic patients with severe AR b. Asymptomatic patients with severe AR and evidence of LV function impairment (per current ESC / ACC guidelines) Any of the following perimeters 1. LVEF ≤55% 2. LVESD \>50 mm 3. LVESDi \>22 mm/m2 4. LVESVi \>45 mL/m2 5. normal LV systolic function at rest (LVEF \>55%), and a progressive decline in LVEF on at least 3 serial studies to the low-normal range (LVEF 55% to 60%) or a progressive increase in LV dilation into the severe range (LV end-diastolic dimension \[LVEDD\] \>65 mm), * 3\) Evaluated by a multi-disciplinary heart team to be suitable for both surgery and transcatheter valve replacement * 4\) Informed of the nature of the study, agrees to its provisions, has provided written informed consent, and agrees to comply with all required post-procedure follow-up visits Exclusion Criteria: * 1\. Confirmed moderate or less AR severity (Grade≤2+) by core laboratory evaluation * 2\. Moderate or severe aortic valve stenosis * 3\. Mixed with clinical relevant severe mitral or tricuspid disease that require valve intervention * 4\. Pre-existing mechanical or bioprosthetic valve in any position. (of note, mitral ring is not an exclusion) * 5\. Subject is high-risk for SAVR as determined by the local heart team * 6\. Subject refuses SAVR as a treatment option * 7\. Subject is selected for aortic valve repair or aortic surgery * 8\. Need for emergency surgery or TAVR for any reason * 9\. Anatomical exclusion criteria (ANY of the following): 1. Aortic Annulus Perimeter \<53 mm or \>94 mm measured by CT 2. Maximal ascending aortic diameter ≥50 mm 3. Congenital aortic valve disease including unicuspid, bicuspid, or quadricuspid aortic valve anatomy 4. Iliofemoral vessel characteristics that would preclude safe placement of the introducer sheath (e.g., calcification, tortuosity). 5. Significant abdominal or thoracic aortic disease (such as porcelain aorta, severe calcification, aortic coarctation, etc.) that preclude safe passage of the delivery system or cannulation and aortotomy for surgical AVR. * 10\. Hemodynamic or respiratory instability requiring inotropic support, mechanical ventilation or mechanical heart assistance within 30 days of the screening visit * 11\. Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) device implantation within 30 days of the screening visit * 12\. Any condition considered a contraindication to mechanical circulatory support * 13\. Hostile chest or conditions or complications from prior surgery that preclude safe reoperation (e.g., mediastinitis, radiation damage, abnormal chest wall, adhesion of aorta or IMA to sternum, etc.) * 14\. Subject refuses blood transfusion * 15\. Marfan syndrome or other known connective tissue disease that would necessitate aortic root replacement/intervention * 16\. Evidence of acute myocardial infarction within 30 days of the screening visit * 17\. Any percutaneous coronary or peripheral interventional procedure performed within 30 days of the screening visit (Subjects with placement of coronary or peripheral stent(s) should be assessed for the ability to safely proceed with SAVR within the protocol timeframe) * 18\. Complex coronary artery disease (one of the following): 1. Unprotected left main coronary artery disease ≥50% 2. True bifurcation lesion (Medina: 1.1.1) and the diameter of the branch vessels is \>2.5 mm 3. Chronic total occlusion (CTO) 4. Long lesion, expected stent length \>38 mm 5. Multivessel lesion (at least 2 coronary arteries require interventional treatment) 6. Need to use multiple stents (planned \> 3 stents) 7. Lesion with in-stent restenosis 8. Severe calcification lesion 9. Coronary ostial lesion 10. Heart Team assessment that optimal revascularization cannot be performed with either CABG at the time of SAVR or PCI at the time of TAVR. * 19\. Symptomatic carotid or vertebral artery disease or carotid intervention within 30 days of the screening visit * 20\. Stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) within 90 days of the screening visit * 21\. Severe left ventricular dysfunction, defined as a resting left ventricular ejection fraction \<25%; or left ventricular end-systolic diameter (LVESD) \>70 mm; or the presence of an artificial heart or left ventricular assist device; or being listed for heart transplantation or status post heart transplantation. * 22\. Moderate to severe or worse right ventricular dysfunction on resting echocardiogram according to core laboratory * 23\. Cardiac imaging (echocardiography, CT, and/or MRI) evidence of intracardiac mass, thrombus or vegetation * 24\. Left atrial thrombus without continuous appropriate anticoagulation within 90 days of the study procedure * 25\. Uncontrolled atrial fibrillation (i.e., resting heart rate \>120 bpm) * 26\. Hemodynamically significant hypertrophic Obstructive cardiomyopathy (HOCM), Peak LVOT gradient ≥50mmHg (resting or provoked) ESC 2022/ ACC 2020 * 27\. Untread Leukopenia (WBC\<3.0\*109/L), Untread Thrombocytopenia (Platelet count \<50\*109), history of bleeding diathesis or coagulopathy, or hypercoagulable states, Acute posthemorrhagic anemia (hemoglobin \<9.0 g/dL) * 28\. Severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (FEV1 \<50% predicted) or currently on home oxygen * 29\. Severe pulmonary hypertension (e.g., PA systolic pressure ≥2/3 systemic pressure) * 30\. Severe chronic liver disease (Child-Pugh C) or any active liver disease * 31\. Renal insufficiency (eGFR\<30mL/min/1.73m²) and/or requiring chronic peritoneal dialysis at the time of screening and/or requiring chronic hemodialysis at the time of screening * 32\. Ongoing sepsis or active infective endocarditis with ongoing antibiotic (including suppressive) therapy or positive blood cultures within 6 weeks * 33\. Subject has a known hypersensitivity or contraindication to all anticoagulation/antiplatelet medications (or inability to be anticoagulated for the index procedure), implant-related materials, or sensitivity to contrast media which cannot be adequately pre-medicated * 34\. Inability to tolerate anti-thrombotic/anticoagulation therapy during or after the valve implant procedure * 35\. Active gastrointestinal bleeding precluding anticoagulation or antiplatelet therapy * 36\. BMI \>50 kg/m2 or \<18.5 kg/m2 * 37\. Estimated life expectancy \<24 months due to associated non- cardiac comorbid conditions * 38\. Immobility that would prevent completion of study procedures * 39\. Currently participating in a cardiovascular investigational drug or another device study and not yet completed follow-up for the primary endpoint. Note: Trials requiring extended follow-up for products that were investigational, but have since become commercially available, are not considered investigational trials. Observational studies are not considered exclusionary * 40\. Severe cognitive decline (resulting in either inability to provide informed consent for the trial/procedure, prevents independent lifestyle outside of a chronic care facility, or will fundamentally complicate rehabilitation from the procedure or compliance with follow-up visits) * 41\. Pregnancy or intent to become pregnant (women suspected of becoming pregnant must have a negative serum or urine test for human chorionic gonadotropin before being included in the study) * 42\. Other patients considered unsuitable for this clinical study by the investigator
Where it's running
-
Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University
Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, China Recruiting -
The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China Recruiting -
The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University
Hefei, Anhui, China Not yet recruiting -
Beijing Anzhen Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China Not yet recruiting -
Fuwai Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China Not yet recruiting -
Fujian Medical University Union Hospital
Fuzhou, Fujian, China Not yet recruiting
Show 22 more locations
-
Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital
Guangzhou, Guangdong, China Not yet recruiting -
Fuwai Central China Cardiovascular Hospital
Zhengzhou, Henan, China Not yet recruiting -
Prince of Wales Hospital
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China Not yet recruiting -
Queen Mary Hospital
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China Not yet recruiting -
Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology
Wuhan, Hubei, China Not yet recruiting -
Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University
Wuhan, Hubei, China Not yet recruiting -
The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University
Changsha, Hunan, China Not yet recruiting -
Xiangya Hospital, Central South University
Changsha, Hunan, China Not yet recruiting -
Nanjing First Hospital
Nanjing, Jiangsu, China Not yet recruiting -
The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University
Nanchang, Jiangxi, China Not yet recruiting -
Xijing Hospital affiliated to Air Force Medical University
Xi'an, Shaanxi, China Not yet recruiting -
Qilu Hospital, Shandong University
Jinan, Shandong, China Not yet recruiting -
The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University
Qingdao, Shandong, China Not yet recruiting -
Shanghai Chest Hospital
Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, China Not yet recruiting -
Shanghai East Hospital
Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, China Not yet recruiting -
Shanghai Geriatric Medical Center
Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, China Not yet recruiting -
West China Hospital, Sichuan University
Chengdu, Sichuan, China Not yet recruiting -
Cheng Hsin General Hospital
Taibei, Taiwan, China Not yet recruiting -
National Taiwan University Hospital
Taibei, Taiwan, China Not yet recruiting -
Tianjin Chest Hospital
Tianjin, Tianjin Municipality, China Not yet recruiting -
Kunming Yan'an Hospital
Kunming, Yunnan, China Not yet recruiting -
The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China Not yet recruiting
Study contacts
- Principal investigator: Jian'an Wang, MD — Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University, School of Medicine
- Study coordinator: Jian'an Wang, MD
- Email: wangjianan111@zju.edu.cn
- Phone: +86-571-8778-4808
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Surgery versus Trilogy transcatheter valve for treating aortic regurgitation
This trial tests whether the Trilogy transcatheter heart valve works as well as surgical aortic valve replacement for people with significant native aortic regurgitation.
-
DELINEATE-Prospective: AI-assisted echocardiogram analysis for valve disease
This project will test whether an AI system can automatically analyze echocardiograms to help doctors detect valve problems in adults who get heart ultrasounds.
-
Surgical implantation of a polymer prosthetic mitral or aortic valve
This will test a surgically implanted polymer heart valve to see if it is safe and works well for adults who need mitral or aortic valve replacement.
-
Korea VHD Echo Study: Real-World Practice of Aortic, Mitral, and Tricuspid Valves
This study looks at how valvular heart disease is managed in Korea by reviewing echocardiograms and medical records from multiple centers to see patterns in disease progression and treatment.
-
Long-term outcomes with the SAPIEN 3 Ultra RESILIA heart valve in adults
This study tests how the SAPIEN 3 Ultra RESILIA valve performs over 10 years in adults undergoing transfemoral TAVR for severe aortic valve disease.
-
Assessing how anesthesia and imaging affect aortic regurgitation evaluation
This study is testing how different types of heart imaging before and after anesthesia affect the way doctors measure aortic regurgitation in patients getting heart surgery.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.