Is routine follow-up paracentesis needed after starting antibiotics for SBP in cirrhosis?
Official title: Randomized Controlled Study of Optimal Treatment Strategy for Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis in Liver Cirrhosis: A Pilot Study
Run by Chonnam National University Hospital · NCT07923318 · Data updated 2026-11-12
We’re testing whether doing a follow-up paracentesis at 48 hours after starting antibiotics changes outcomes for people with spontaneous bacterial peritonitis due to liver cirrhosis.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years and up |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 40 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Chonnam National University Hospital Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Gwangju, Gwangju) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | October 4, 2026 |
| Main results expected | December 31, 2027 |
| Study ends | December 31, 2028 |
| Registry record updated | November 6, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT07923318 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Adults with liver cirrhosis and a confirmed SBP who can safely undergo paracentesis and provide consent.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients who do not show a benefit from follow-up sampling or who have rapid clinical improvement may not gain any advantage from routine paracentesis.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This is a pilot randomized trial enrolling 40 adults with cirrhosis and SBP to compare routine follow-up paracentesis at 48 hours versus no routine follow-up paracentesis, in addition to standard antibiotics and IV albumin. Participants are randomly assigned 1:1 to either approach and will be treated according to a predefined protocol. The study aims to determine if routine follow-up fluid sampling improves clinical outcomes or if it can be safely omitted when the patient shows clinical improvement. Results could inform whether this procedure is routinely needed to guide care in SBP. Safety monitoring will track adverse events and overall survival.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If routine follow-up paracentesis is unnecessary, patients may experience fewer procedures, reduced discomfort, and lower healthcare utilization without compromising outcomes.
How similar studies have gone: Previous studies have explored diagnostic paracentesis timing, but this specific routine follow-up approach in SBP is less well established and largely exploratory.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Adults aged 18 years or older * Diagnosis of liver cirrhosis based on clinical, histologic, or imaging findings * Diagnosis of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis confirmed by an ascitic fluid polymorphonuclear leukocyte (PMN) count of ≥250 cells/mm³ at initial paracentesis * Ability and willingness to provide written informed consent Exclusion Criteria: * Suspected secondary bacterial peritonitis, including suspected perforation of a gastrointestinal organ * Inability to safely undergo paracentesis, defined as platelet count \<20,000/mm³ or prothrombin time international normalized ratio (PT-INR) \>3.0 * Active bleeding or shock * Expected survival of less than 48 hours * Pregnancy or breastfeeding * Previous ascitic fluid or blood culture demonstrating resistance to cefotaxime or ceftriaxone * Any other condition that, in the investigator's judgment, would prevent adherence to the study protocol
Where it's running
-
Chonnam National University Hospital
Gwangju, Gwangju, South Korea Recruiting
Study contacts
- Study coordinator: Eun-chae Yoo, CRC(Clinical research coordinator)
- Email: karenaec5@daum.net
- Phone: +82-62-220-6216
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Evaluating brain connectivity in patients with refractory constipation
This study is trying to see how brain activity in people with stubborn constipation can help predict if they will respond well to fluoxetine and other treatments.
-
Comparing oral Gemifloxacin and intravenous Cefotaxime for treating spontaneous bacterial peritonitis
This study is testing whether taking Gemifloxacin by mouth works as well as getting Cefotaxime through an IV for treating people with spontaneous bacterial peritonitis.
-
Comparing Norfloxacin with Itopride to Norfloxacin alone for preventing infections in liver disease patients
This study tests if adding Itopride to Norfloxacin can better prevent infections in liver disease patients who have had a previous infection.
-
Evaluation of the Alfapump® device for treating refractory ascites in cirrhotic patients
This study is testing if the Alfapump® device can help people with cirrhosis and fluid buildup feel better and reduce hospital visits compared to the usual treatment.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.