Improving colorectal cancer screening in primary care clinics
Official title: PB-iCRC: Multi-site Practice-Based Implementation of a ColoRectal Cancer Screening Intervention
Run by University of Kansas Medical Center · NCT06682650 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This study is testing two different ways to improve colorectal cancer screening rates in primary care clinics to see which one helps more people get screened.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 45 Years to 75 Years |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 2200 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | University of Kansas Medical Center Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Aurora, Colorado) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | April 30, 2025 |
| Main results expected | November 30, 2028 |
| Study ends | April 30, 2029 |
| Registry record updated | March 10, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT06682650 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Ideal candidates for this study are adults aged 45 to 75 who are due for colorectal cancer screening and prefer Spanish as their primary language.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients with a personal or close family history of colorectal cancer who are ineligible for routine screening may not benefit from this study.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This study aims to enhance colorectal cancer screening uptake in primary care settings by comparing two implementation strategies: a Normalization Process Theory-informed Participatory Learning in Action (NPT-PLA) approach and a usual quality improvement method. Conducted in 20 US primary care clinics, the trial will assess the effectiveness of the NPT-PLA intervention in increasing screening orders and completions over a six-month period. Additionally, the study will evaluate the facilitators and barriers encountered in each implementation arm using an expanded Normalization Process Theory framework. Patients aged 45 to 75 who are due for screening will be enrolled and monitored for their screening outcomes.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, this study could significantly increase colorectal cancer screening rates, leading to earlier detection and improved patient outcomes.
How similar studies have gone: Previous studies have shown success with implementation intentions-based tools for increasing colorectal cancer screening, making this approach promising yet still innovative in its application.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Clinics participating in the DARTNet Institute /AAFP-affiliated NRN clinic serving communities in which at least 25% of the population prefers Spanish-language. Clinic implementation teams Patients participating in implementation teams for whom Spanish is their preferred language, who are bilingual in English and Spanish, Clinics Staff will be included who have any contact regarding CRC screening with patients eligible for screening. Patients whose CRC screening outcomes will be monitored: adults 45 to 75 years of age who are due for CRC screening, i.e. who have not received a high-sensitivity fecal occult blood test or a fecal immunochemical test within the past year, fecal DNA testing within 3 years, sigmoidoscopy or barium enema within 5 years, or colonoscopy within 10 years; and who receive primary care at least annually from the site. Exclusion Criteria: * patients ineligible for routine screening based on a personal or close family history of colorectal cancer or who have increased genetic risk of colon cancer. * cognitive or decisional incapacity will be excluded from the implementation teams, after completion of a brief, validate screening tool, the Mini-Cog Exam.
Where it's running
-
DARTNet Institute
Aurora, Colorado, United States Recruiting
Study contacts
- Principal investigator: Joseph W LeMaster, MD MPH — University of Kansas
- Study coordinator: Joseph W LeMaster, MD MPH
- Email: jlemaster@kumc.edu
- Phone: 573-999-3366
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Exercise after pelvic radiation to see if it lowers colorectal cancer risk
This study tests whether regular walking therapy after pelvic radiation for prostate cancer can influence markers of colorectal cancer in colon tissue and blood.
-
Irreversible Electroporation for Recurrent Pelvic Tumors
This study tests whether using irreversible electroporation (IRE) is safe and helps control recurrent pelvic tumors in adults who can’t have other local treatments.
-
Smart Symptom Tracking with ALEX for GI Health in Young Adults
This trial tests whether the Smart Symptom Tracking ALEX app can better track GI symptoms in young adults (18–44) compared with standard paper logs.
-
Culturally adapted online genetic counseling and testing education for African American cancer survivors
We will test a culturally adapted online genetic counseling program to see if it increases genetic counseling and genetic testing among African American breast, prostate, and colorectal cancer survivors.
-
Zanidatamab given before surgery for HER2-positive colon or rectal cancer
This tests whether giving zanidatamab before surgery helps adults with HER2-positive, RAS‑wildtype colon or rectal cancer who are planned for curative treatment.
-
In-home cancer treatment with remote specialist support for patients in the Florida Panhandle
This program will try giving standard cancer treatments at home to people living in the Florida Panhandle and nearby areas to see if they prefer it and have better treatment satisfaction.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.