Impact of breathing methods on heart procedure success for atrial fibrillation
Official title: The Effect of Mechanical Ventilation on Radiofrequency Ablation in The Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation.
Run by Kocaeli City Hospital · NCT06791915 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This study tests whether using different breathing methods during a heart procedure for atrial fibrillation can help improve the success of the treatment.
Quick facts
| Study type | Observational |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years and up |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 50 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Kocaeli City Hospital Government |
| Locations | 1 site (Kocaeli) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | January 1, 2025 |
| Main results expected | July 1, 2025 |
| Study ends | August 1, 2025 |
| Registry record updated | January 24, 2025 |
| Trial ID | NCT06791915 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Ideal candidates are adults over 18 years old diagnosed with atrial fibrillation who are scheduled for radiofrequency ablation under general anesthesia.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients undergoing ablation under sedation or local anesthesia will not benefit from this study.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This observational study investigates how different mechanical ventilation techniques during radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for atrial fibrillation (AF) affect procedural outcomes. It focuses on the relationship between catheter stability, contact force, and respiratory motion, which can influence the effectiveness of the ablation. Patients diagnosed with AF who are scheduled for RFA under general anesthesia will be monitored to assess the impact of controlled versus spontaneous ventilation on the success of the procedure. The study aims to optimize techniques to improve energy delivery and reduce AF recurrence rates.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, this study could enhance the effectiveness of atrial fibrillation treatments, leading to better patient outcomes and reduced recurrence rates.
How similar studies have gone: Previous studies have indicated that controlled ventilation can improve outcomes in similar procedures, suggesting a promising avenue for further exploration.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Diagnosed with atrial fibrillation * planned to receive radiofrequency ablation treatment under general anesthesia * all patients over 18 years of age Exclusion Criteria: \- Patients undergoing ablation under sedation and/or local anesthesia
Where it's running
-
Kocaeli City Hospital
Kocaeli, Turkey (Türkiye) Recruiting
Study contacts
- Study coordinator: Merve Yazici Kara
- Email: merreset@hotmail.com
- Phone: +90 533 686 0156
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Comparing hybrid and catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
This study is testing whether a new hybrid ablation method works better than traditional catheter ablation for controlling heart rhythm in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and ongoing atrial fibrillation.
-
AI-based tools to help diagnose, treat and predict stroke outcomes across multiple hospitals
This study tests AI-powered tools on real-world stroke patients to see if they can improve pre-hospital triage, diagnosis, and outcome prediction while data stay securely within each hospital.
-
Pulse Wave vs Saline Bolus EIT to measure lung perfusion in ARDS
This study tests whether pulse wave EIT or saline bolus EIT can best show lung blood flow in ARDS patients on mechanical ventilation.
-
Computed inspiratory muscle pressure to monitor inspiratory effort during pressure-targeted assist/control ventilation
This study tests a noninvasive computed pressure method (cPmus) to see if it matches the traditional esophageal pressure method for measuring inspiratory effort in adults on pressure-targeted ventilation with spontaneous breathing.
-
Noninvasive estimate of inspiratory effort to monitor pressure support ventilation
This study tests whether a noninvasive computed inspiratory muscle pressure (cPmus) can match the traditional esophageal pressure method for adults on pressure support ventilation.
-
Driving pressure-guided individualized PEEP vs standard PEEP during upper abdominal surgery
In this randomized trial, adults at higher risk of breathing problems after upper abdominal surgery will try a personalized PEEP level based on the lowest driving pressure and compare it to a fixed PEEP of 5 cmH2O to see if it lowers postoperative lung complications.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.