Clinical trial Recruiting at 1 site Interventional Ages 20 to 40

Immediate vs conventional implants after atraumatic extraction in upper premolars

Official title: Effect of Immediate Placement and Loading of Compressive Versus Conventional Implants After Atraumatic Extraction Extraction (A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial)

Run by Beni-Suef University · NCT07601347 · Data updated 2026-11-12

This study tests whether placing and loading dental implants immediately after tooth extraction works better than the traditional approach for upper premolars in eligible adults.

Quick facts

Study typeInterventional
Ages20 Years to 40 Years
SexAll
Enrollment30 (estimated)
SponsorBeni-Suef University
Academic / other
Locations1 site (Banī Suwayf)
StatusRecruiting
StartedDecember 1, 2025
Main results expectedDecember 1, 2026
Study endsDecember 1, 2026
Registry record updatedMay 22, 2026
Trial IDNCT07601347 on ClinicalTrials.gov

Is this trial a fit for you?

Likely a good fit

Medically healthy adults aged 20–40 needing upper premolar implants after tooth loss, non-smokers, with sufficient bone to cover two-thirds of the root.

Probably not a fit

Individuals with systemic diseases affecting healing, heavy smokers, or unfavorable tooth position or bone deficiency may not benefit.

A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.

What this trial studies

This interventional study compares two implant strategies following atraumatic extraction: immediate placement and loading of compressive implants versus conventional delayed placement. It aims to measure effectiveness, bone loss, and implant survival between the two approaches. Eligible participants are adults aged 20–40 who need implants for badly damaged upper premolars, are non-smokers, and free of systemic conditions affecting healing. The study protocol involves surgical placement of implants and immediate functional loading with suitable prosthetics, with follow-up to assess outcomes. The evidence will inform whether rapid restoration provides advantages without compromising health or longevity of implants.

Why it matters

Potential benefit: If successful, patients may experience faster restoration of function and aesthetics with reliable implant stability.

How similar studies have gone: Previous implant dentistry studies support the effectiveness of implants, but direct evidence comparing immediate vs conventional loading after extraction is mixed and context-specific.

Who can join: the full rules

Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria:

* Medically free patient
* Males and females
* Non-smoker patients
* Age ranging from 20-40 years
* Badly destructed upper premolar teeth that require implants, bone covering 2/3 of the root and of sufficient bone volume.

Exclusion Criteria:

* Patients with systemic conditions known to affect the periodontal status and healing such as uncontrolled diabetes and osteoporosis
* Heavy smokers
* Unfavorable position of the tooth or remaining roots
* Vitamin D deficiency,
* Periapical lesion/ periodontal affection

Where it's running

  • Beni-suef university
    Banī Suwayf, Egypt
    Recruiting

Study contacts

Similar studies

Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.

How to take part

  1. Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
  2. Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
  3. Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.
Last reviewed 2026-11-14 by the Find a Trial editorial team. Information on this page is for educational purposes and is not medical advice. Always consult qualified healthcare professionals about clinical trial participation.