Immediate vs conventional implants after atraumatic extraction in upper premolars
Official title: Effect of Immediate Placement and Loading of Compressive Versus Conventional Implants After Atraumatic Extraction Extraction (A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial)
Run by Beni-Suef University · NCT07601347 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This study tests whether placing and loading dental implants immediately after tooth extraction works better than the traditional approach for upper premolars in eligible adults.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 20 Years to 40 Years |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 30 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Beni-Suef University Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Banī Suwayf) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | December 1, 2025 |
| Main results expected | December 1, 2026 |
| Study ends | December 1, 2026 |
| Registry record updated | May 22, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT07601347 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Medically healthy adults aged 20–40 needing upper premolar implants after tooth loss, non-smokers, with sufficient bone to cover two-thirds of the root.
✕Probably not a fit
Individuals with systemic diseases affecting healing, heavy smokers, or unfavorable tooth position or bone deficiency may not benefit.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This interventional study compares two implant strategies following atraumatic extraction: immediate placement and loading of compressive implants versus conventional delayed placement. It aims to measure effectiveness, bone loss, and implant survival between the two approaches. Eligible participants are adults aged 20–40 who need implants for badly damaged upper premolars, are non-smokers, and free of systemic conditions affecting healing. The study protocol involves surgical placement of implants and immediate functional loading with suitable prosthetics, with follow-up to assess outcomes. The evidence will inform whether rapid restoration provides advantages without compromising health or longevity of implants.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, patients may experience faster restoration of function and aesthetics with reliable implant stability.
How similar studies have gone: Previous implant dentistry studies support the effectiveness of implants, but direct evidence comparing immediate vs conventional loading after extraction is mixed and context-specific.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Medically free patient * Males and females * Non-smoker patients * Age ranging from 20-40 years * Badly destructed upper premolar teeth that require implants, bone covering 2/3 of the root and of sufficient bone volume. Exclusion Criteria: * Patients with systemic conditions known to affect the periodontal status and healing such as uncontrolled diabetes and osteoporosis * Heavy smokers * Unfavorable position of the tooth or remaining roots * Vitamin D deficiency, * Periapical lesion/ periodontal affection
Where it's running
-
Beni-suef university
Banī Suwayf, Egypt Recruiting
Study contacts
- Study coordinator: ahmed alghandour, phd
- Email: ahmed.nagi@dent.bsu.eg
- Phone: 01224567435
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Concomitant TURP with bladder stone surgery vs bladder stone surgery alone in men with BPH
This study tests whether adding TURP at the time of bladder stone surgery helps men with BPH have better short-term outcomes.
-
Emergency urinary drainage followed by PCNL in obstructive urosepsis
Doctors test whether the method of emergency drainage (retrograde ureteral stent or percutaneous nephrostomy) affects how well patients do after undergoing definitive PCNL.
-
Palmitoylethanolamide for Central Sensitisation and Neuroinflammation in Chronic Low Back Pain
A treatment with palmitoylethanolamide is being tried to see if it helps people with chronic low back pain who have nerve-related pain and disc problems.
-
Nebulized dexmedetomidine for early chronic migraine
This study tests whether inhaled dexmedetomidine can lessen central sensitization and help prevent chronification in people with early chronic migraine.
-
Integrated neuromuscular inhibition, dry cupping, and dry needling for neck pain
This trial tests four treatment setups to see which helps people with chronic neck muscle pain best, all alongside standard physical therapy.
-
See if empagliflozin helps kidney function in people with lupus nephritis
This study tests whether adding empagliflozin to standard care improves kidney function in adults with active lupus nephritis.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.