Home-based virtual reality treatment for phantom leg pain
Official title: Efficacy and Mechanisms of Virtual Reality Treatment of Phantom Leg Pain.Home-Based Treatment
Run by Albert Einstein Healthcare Network · NCT07044323 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This program will test whether a home-based active virtual reality treatment can reduce phantom leg pain for adults after a lower-limb amputation.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years to 100 Years |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 44 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Albert Einstein Healthcare Network Academic / other |
| Locations | 3 sites (Philadelphia, Pennsylvania and 2 other locations) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | June 16, 2025 |
| Main results expected | May 31, 2026 |
| Study ends | May 31, 2026 |
| Registry record updated | August 8, 2025 |
| Trial ID | NCT07044323 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Ideal candidates are adults (18+) with a unilateral above- or below-knee amputation at least three months prior, who report average phantom limb pain greater than 4/10 and can complete cognitive testing (MoCA ≥18) and home VR activities.
✕Probably not a fit
People with bilateral amputations, significant cognitive impairment, uncontrolled psychiatric illness or substance abuse, current pregnancy, or lower average phantom pain (≤4/10) are unlikely to qualify or receive benefit from this protocol.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
Adults with unilateral above- or below-knee amputations and persistent phantom limb pain will use an active virtual reality program at home that displays a first-person avatar leg and provides controller-based positional feedback while they play leg-moving games. Participants will be enrolled at sites in Philadelphia and Seattle and will use the home VR system for a defined treatment period with pain intensity, psychological health, and quality-of-life measures collected remotely. The active VR approach provides visual and sensorimotor feedback of the missing limb to encourage movement and cortical engagement, unlike distractor VR which offers passive navigation without limb representation. Investigators previously completed an in-person comparison in which active VR produced greater reductions in pain intensity than distractor VR.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, the home-based active VR program could reduce phantom limb pain and improve daily functioning without adding medications or invasive procedures.
How similar studies have gone: Prior in-person research by the investigators and other small trials have shown that active, body-representing VR can reduce phantom limb pain, but home-based delivery remains less tested.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Age 18 -100 * Capacity to provide Informed Consent * Unilateral above or below knee amputation more than 3 months prior to enrollment * Absence of cognitive impairment, operationally defined as a Montreal Cognitive Assessment score of 18 or greater1. * Pain averaged over the preceding 1 month in the phantom limb rated as greater than 4 on a scale of 0-10. Exclusion Criteria: * History of significant medical or neurological disorder such as stroke or moderate to severe traumatic brain injury (operationally defined as loss of consciousness for more than 30 minutes) * History of significant or poorly controlled psychiatric disorders * Substantial depression or anxiety affecting their ability to perform tasks necessary for the study. * Current abuse of alcohol or drugs, prescription or otherwise * Nursing a child, pregnant, or intent to become pregnant during the study
Where it's running
-
Jefferson Moss Rehabilitation Research Institute
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States Recruiting -
University of Pennsylvania
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States Recruiting -
University of Washington
Seattle, Washington, United States Recruiting
Study contacts
- Study coordinator: Laurel Buxbaum
- Email: Laurel.Buxbaum@jefferson.edu
- Phone: 215-663-6321
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Comparing powered and mechanical prosthetic knees for K2-level amputees
This study is testing whether powered prosthetic knees work better than mechanical ones for K2-level amputees to help improve their mobility and make better choices for future prosthetic designs.
-
Effect of EMG sensor number and placement on control of below-elbow prosthetic arms
This project will test whether changing the number and placement of myoelectric sensors helps adults with below-elbow limb absence control a prosthetic arm better while wearing a real device.
-
Microprocessor-controlled prosthetic knees for limited community ambulators with above-knee amputation.
This test will see if switching to a microprocessor-controlled prosthetic knee reduces fall-related health problems and improves walking speed, mobility, and quality of life for adults with above-knee amputations who are limited community ambulators compared with non-microprocessor knees.
-
Understanding the impact of powered prosthetics on walking for transfemoral amputees
This study is testing whether powered knee and ankle prosthetics can help transfemoral amputees walk better, especially when combined with special training.
-
Evaluation of a new myoelectric prosthesis for transradial amputees
This study is testing a new type of prosthetic arm that uses a special implant to help people with below-the-elbow amputations control it more easily and naturally.
-
Hand prosthesis usability and performance evaluation for people with upper limb absence
This study tests a new multi-articulating hand prosthesis to see if it performs better or differently than a participant’s own prosthesis.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.