GORE MBA Arch Endoprosthesis Early Feasibility Study
Official title: Early Feasibility Study of the GORE® Multibranch Arch Endoprosthesis (MBA Device)
Run by W.L.Gore & Associates · NCT07564375 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This study tests the safety of the MBA device in people with arch-related thoracic aortic diseases to see if it can be used safely in real-world settings.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years and up |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 20 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | W.L.Gore & Associates Industry-sponsored |
| Drugs / interventions | chemotherapy, radiation |
| Locations | 3 sites (Los Angeles, California and 2 other locations) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | September 2, 2026 |
| Main results expected | August 2028 |
| Study ends | August 2033 |
| Registry record updated | October 1, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT07564375 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Ideal candidates are adults with thoracic aortic pathologies involving arch branch vessels that meet device eligibility criteria (aneurysm, pseudoaneurysm, PAU, or certain types of dissection) and are planned for MBA device treatment.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients who do not meet device eligibility criteria or have pathology not suitable for the MBA approach may not benefit.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This is a prospective, multicenter, non-randomized, single-arm early feasibility study evaluating the initial safety of the MBA device through five years after the index endovascular procedure. It enrolls up to 20 subjects across up to 14 sites in the US and Europe, with phased enrollment beginning with dissection cases and expanding to aneurysm and other isolated lesions. The primary goal is to generate descriptive safety data in patients with thoracic aortic pathology involving arch branch vessels treated with the GORE Multibranch Arch Endoprosthesis or Ascending Stent Graft. Sites include USC, Cleveland Clinic, and Baylor Research Institute, led by Gore & Associates with NAMSA as collaborator.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, patients may benefit from a potentially safer and more durable endovascular option for complex arch-related thoracic aortic disease.
How similar studies have gone: Prior similar device studies have shown safety signals in early feasibility programs, but this specific multi-branch arch device study is an early feasibility effort with descriptive outcomes and limited comparative data.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: The subject is / has: 1. Thoracic pathologies with involvement of the arch branch vessels, that are compatible with the treatment requirements of the MBA device, and meeting any of the following criteria: a) Aneurysm and Isolated Lesions: i. Fusiform aneurysm (≥ 55 mm or documented growth rate \> 0.5 cm/year). ii. Saccular aneurysm (no diameter criteria). iii. Pseudoaneurysms (\> 30 days post-surgery, no diameter criteria). iv. Penetrating Aortic Ulcers (PAUs) without intramural hematoma (IMH) (no diameter criteria). b) Aortic dissection: i. Uncomplicated and high-risk chronic de novo (\> 90 days) Type B aortic dissection with primary entry tear in the arch or descending thoracic aorta. ii. Residual aortic dissection following surgical repair of Type A aortic dissection requiring treatment (\> 30 days post-treatment). iii. Proximal extension of prior endovascular repair (\> 30 days post-treatment and \> 90 days post-dissection) of a Type B dissection requiring treatment. iv. Pseudoaneurysms, following open surgical repair of a Type A dissection (\> 30 days post-surgery, no diameter criteria). 2. Anatomic compatibility with MBA device and other devices required for proximal or distal extensions based on Gore's review. 1. Adequate vascular access via transfemoral or retroperitoneal approach. 2. Appropriate vascular access to allow for through-wire access to the brachiocephalic artery, LCCA, and LSA. 3. Proximal Aortic Landing Zone: i. Landing zone is native aorta, surgical graft, or previously implanted GORE thoracic stent graft. ii. Landing zone diameter between 27 mm - 48 mm. iii. Acceptable ascending aorta outer curvature length for the required MBA device. 1. Proximal segment length (length from distal edge of brachiocephalic artery to distal edge of the most distal coronary artery) must be ≥ 2 cm longer than the "AC Proximal End to BCA Portal Length" for the selected Aortic Component or ≥ 3 cm if the landing zone is \> 42 mm. 2. For patients with patent bypass graft from the ascending aorta, proximal extent of landing zone must be ≥ 1 cm distal to the bypass graft. iv. Lesion location is ≥ 2 cm distal to the most distal coronary artery ostium. v. For patients with an existing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) there must be a sufficient proximal landing zone to avoid interference with the required MBA device (including any proximal extensions with the ASG device). vi. Proximal landing zone must be ≥ 2 cm in the ascending aorta. 1. For patients with prior replacement of the ascending aorta and / or aortic arch by surgical graft, there must be ≥ 2 cm overlap of MBA device and previously implanted graft. 2. For patients with a de novo aortic dissection, the primary entry tear must be located ≥ 2 cm distal to the proximal extent of the MBA device (including any proximal extensions) and the proximal edge of the stent graft must land in non-dissected aorta. vii. Landing zone cannot be aneurysmal, heavily calcified, or heavily thrombosed. d) Branch Vessel Landing Zone: i. Length of ≥ 2.5 cm proximal to first major branch vessel. ii. Target branch vessel inner diameter of 11-18 mm for the 12 mm portal, and 6-15 mm for the 8 mm portal. iii. Target branch vessel landing zone must be in native aorta that cannot be heavily calcified, or heavily thrombosed. iv. All three arch target vessels must have appropriate anatomy for cannulation (including through-wire access) and treatment with MBA branch components. e) Distal Aortic Landing Zone (aneurysms and isolated lesions only): i. Outer curvature length must be ≥ 2 cm proximal to the celiac artery. ii. Aortic inner diameters between 16-42 mm. iii. Landing zone cannot be aneurysmal, heavily calcified, or heavily thrombosed. iv. Landing zone in native aorta, surgical graft, or previously implanted GORE thoracic stent graft. 3. Age ≥ 18 years at time of informed consent signature. 4. Informed Consent Form (ICF) signed by the subject or legally authorized representative (LAR), according to local regulation. 5. Agrees to comply with protocol requirements, including imaging and five year (60 month) follow-up. 6. Considered high-risk for open surgical repair by meeting one or more of the following criteria: 1. ≥ 75 years of age 2. Previous median sternotomy 3. Documented identification of other subject-specific risk factors (e.g., medical history, active medical diagnosis) by a study investigator and an experienced open ascending and / or aortic arch surgeon (e.g., cardiothoracic surgeon). 7. Considered high-risk for surgical debranching by meeting one or more of the following criteria: 1. Prior neck surgery or radiation 2. Neck anatomy / body habitus impeding carotid access or safe bypass tunneling 3. Dysphagia 4. Elevated risk for post-operative infection (e.g., malnutrition, uncontrolled diabetes (hemoglobin A1c \> 9%), current treatment with immunosuppressant therapy or chemotherapy) 5. Reduced pulmonary function (e.g., severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), current or anticipated tracheostomy) 6. Clinical Frailty Scale score 6-7 7. Documented identification of other subject-specific risk factors which would pose high risk for surgical debranching (e.g., medical history, active medical diagnosis) by a study investigator Exclusion Criteria: The subject is / has: 1. De novo Type A dissection 2. Requires immediate treatment. 3. Arch vessels with dissection extending into the intended landing zones. 4. Anticipated need for coronary or aortic valve intervention within one year post-treatment. 5. Any aortic valve repair or replacement including transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) or coronary artery intervention within 30 days prior to treatment. 6. Complex percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) within 30 days prior to treatment. 7. Open chest surgical repair within 30 days prior to treatment. 8. Any open or interventional repair of either carotid artery within 30 days prior to treatment. 9. Presence of Intramural Hematoma (IMH) in landing zones. 10. Prosthetic heart valve in the aortic position that precludes safe delivery of any study device. 11. Aortic insufficiency (AI) grade 3 or greater. 12. Previous endovascular repair with a non-Gore device that would interfere with or result in contact with planned repair. 13. Concomitant vascular disease, including disease associated with the great and upper extremity vessels, requiring treatment that is not planned for index endovascular procedure. 14. Any stroke or MI within 90 days prior to treatment. 15. Presence of protruding and / or irregular thrombus and / or atheroma in the ascending aorta or aortic arch or any other factor that could increase the risk of stroke based on Gore's review. 16. Any chronic condition that is not well controlled and that is known to increase stroke risk. 17. Known degenerative connective tissue disease (e.g., Marfan's or Ehler-Danlos Syndrome (EDS)). 18. Participation in investigational drug or medical device study within one year of enrollment unless approved by the sponsor. 19. Known medical, social, or psychological issues that the Investigator believes may interfere with treatment or follow-up, such as a history of drug abuse within one year of treatment. 20. Pregnant at time of procedure or planning to become pregnant within the first 12-months of participation in the study. 21. Active infected aorta, mycotic aneurysm. 22. Active systemic infection (e.g., infection requiring treatment with parenteral anti-infective medication). 23. Renal failure, defined as patients with an estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) \< 30 (mL/min/1.73 m2) or currently requiring dialysis. 24. Life expectancy \<12 months. 25. Known sensitivities or allergies to the device materials. 26. Known hypersensitivity or contraindication to anticoagulants or contrast media, which is not amenable to pre-treatment. 27. Body habitus or other medical condition which prevents adequate fluoroscopic and CT visualization of the aorta. 28. Previous instance of Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia type 2 (HIT-2) or known hypersensitivity to heparin or a history of a hypercoagulability disorder and / or state. 29. Severe Congestive Heart Failure (CHF) (New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class IV). 30. Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) including unstable angina.
Where it's running
-
University of Southern California
Los Angeles, California, United States Recruiting -
Cleveland Clinic
Cleveland, Ohio, United States Recruiting -
Baylor Research Institute
Plano, Texas, United States Recruiting
Study contacts
- Study coordinator: Clinical Study Manager
- Email: MBAEarlyFeasibilityStudy@wlgore.com
- Phone: 800-437-8181
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Using presepsin levels to guide antibiotic treatment in thoracic aorta surgery patients
This study is testing if measuring a specific marker in the blood can help doctors give the right antibiotics to patients after thoracic aorta surgery to prevent infections and improve recovery.
-
Endovascular treatment for aortic arch pathologies in Spain
This study is testing if special stent devices can help people aged 18 to 90 with serious aortic arch problems live longer and stay safe.
-
Castor and Cratos Branched Aortic Grafts Registry for Thoracic Aortic Pathologies
This European registry collects real-world data to see how Castor and Cratos branched stent grafts perform in adults with thoracic aortic diseases.
-
See if spironolactone can reduce aortic stiffness in adults with thoracic aortic aneurysm
This study tests whether spironolactone reduces aortic stiffness compared with placebo in adults with degenerative thoracic aortic aneurysms.
-
Real-world use of WallabyPhenox flow-diversion and stent devices for brain aneurysms and vascular injuries
This registry tracks whether WallabyPhenox flow-diverters, stents, and related implants work well and are safe for people treated for brain aneurysms, dissections, pseudoaneurysms, perforations, or related vascular problems.
-
Evaluating outcomes of thoracic aortic repair in patients with compromised landing zones
This study is testing different stent-graft options for patients with aortic aneurysms who have tricky anatomy to see if they can prevent complications after surgery.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.