Extending treatment options for stroke caused by basilar artery blockage
Official title: Extending the Time Window for Tenecteplase by Effective RecanalizatioN of bAsilar Artery occLusion in Patients With POSTerior Circulation Stroke (POST-ETERNAL)
Run by University of Melbourne · NCT05105633 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This study is testing if a new treatment called tenecteplase can help people who have had a stroke from a blocked basilar artery feel better and recover more effectively compared to standard care.
Quick facts
| Phase | Phase2; Phase3 |
|---|---|
| Study type | Interventional |
| Ages | 18 Years and up |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 688 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | University of Melbourne Academic / other |
| Locations | 17 sites (Bankstown, New South Wales and 16 other locations) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | November 29, 2021 |
| Main results expected | May 2028 |
| Study ends | May 2029 |
| Registry record updated | May 6, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT05105633 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Ideal candidates are adults aged 18 and older presenting with posterior circulation ischemic stroke symptoms due to basilar artery occlusion within 24 hours of symptom onset.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients with intracerebral hemorrhage or significant pre-existing conditions that would preclude safe participation may not benefit from this study.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This clinical trial evaluates the effectiveness of tenecteplase, a thrombolytic agent, in patients experiencing acute ischemic stroke due to basilar artery occlusion. Patients will be randomly assigned to receive either standard care or tenecteplase before undergoing mechanical thrombectomy if necessary. The study employs a Multi-Arm Multi-Stage design with adaptive sample size adjustments based on interim results, focusing on recanalization rates and functional outcomes at three months. The trial aims to determine if extending the treatment window for tenecteplase can improve patient outcomes in this critical condition.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, this study could provide a new treatment option that improves recovery outcomes for patients with basilar artery occlusion.
How similar studies have gone: While the use of tenecteplase in other stroke contexts has shown promise, this specific approach for basilar artery occlusion is novel and has not been extensively tested.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Patients presenting with posterior circulation ischemic stroke symptoms due to partial or complete basilar artery occlusion within 24 hours from symptom onset (or clinical deterioration/coma) or the time the patient was last known to be well. * Patient's age is ≥18 years * Presence of basilar artery occlusion, proven by CT Angiography or MR Angiography. Basilar artery occlusion is defined as 'potentially retrievable' occlusion at the basilar artery. This can be a partial or complete occlusion. * Premorbid mRS ≤3 (independent function or requiring only minor domestic assistance and able to manage alone for at least 1 week). * Local legal requirements for consent have been satisfied. Exclusion Criteria: * Intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) or other diagnosis (e.g. tumour) identified by baseline imaging. * Posterior circulation Acute Stroke Prognosis Early CT score (pc-ASPECTS) \<7 on non-contrast CT, CT Angiography source images or DWI MRI. * Significant cerebellar mass effect or acute hydrocephalus. * Established frank hypodensity on non-contrast CT indicating subacute infarction. * Bilateral extensive brainstem ischemia. * Strong suspicion of underlying intracranial atherosclerotic disease (e.g diffuse arterial calcifications, basilar stenosis) or dissection which may require immediate neuro-interventional procedure with intracranial stenting and not benefit from intravenous thrombolysis at investigator's discretion. * Pre-stroke mRS of ≥4 (indicating moderate to severe previous disability). * Other standard contraindications to intravenous thrombolysis. * Contraindication to imaging with contrast agents. * Clinically evident pregnant women. * Current participation in another research drug treatment protocol. * Known terminal illness such that the patients would not be expected to survive a year. * Planned withdrawal of care or comfort care measures. * Any condition that, in the judgment of the investigator could impose hazards to the patient if study therapy is initiated or affect the participation of the patient in the study.
Where it's running
-
Liverpool Hospital
Sydney, New South Wales, Australia Recruiting -
Princess Alexandra Hospital
Woolloongabba, Queensland, Australia Recruiting -
Royal Adelaide Hospital
Adelaide, South Australia, Australia Recruiting -
Alfred Health
Melbourne, Victoria, Australia Recruiting -
Austin Hospital
Melbourne, Victoria, Australia Recruiting -
Box Hill Hospital
Melbourne, Victoria, Australia Recruiting
Show 11 more locations
-
Royal Melbourne Hospital
Melbourne, Victoria, Australia Recruiting -
Western Health
Melbourne, Victoria, Australia Recruiting -
Fiona Stanley Hospital
Murdoch, Western Australia, Australia Recruiting -
Grampians Health
Ballarat, Australia Recruiting -
Northern Hospital
Melbourne, Australia Recruiting -
Hospital Geral de Fortaleza
Fortaleza, Brazil Recruiting -
Tours University Hospital
Tours, France Recruiting -
Bankstown-Lidcombe Hospital
Bankstown, New South Wales, Australia Not yet recruiting -
John Hunter Hospital
Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia Not yet recruiting -
Gold Coast Hospital
Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia Not yet recruiting -
Monash Health
Melbourne, Victoria, Australia Not yet recruiting
Study contacts
- Principal investigator: Bruce Campbell — University of Melbourne
- Study coordinator: Fana Alemseged, MD, PhD
- Email: Fana.Alemseged@unimelb.edu.au
- Phone: +6193424424
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Endovascular Therapy for Basilar Artery Occlusion With Large Ischemic Core
This trial tests whether adding endovascular therapy to standard medical care helps people with acute basilar artery occlusion and a large area of brain already affected.
-
Basilar artery occlusion with large brain infarct: real-world endovascular vs medical therapy
This registry follows adults with basilar artery occlusion and a large core infarct to see how endovascular therapy compares to medical management in routine care.
-
Tenecteplase before transfer for basilar artery stroke 4.5–24 hours after symptom onset
This trial tests whether giving IV tenecteplase before transfer helps people with basilar artery occlusion who are 4.5–24 hours from symptom onset and are being sent for thrombectomy.
-
Endovascular treatment for acute basilar artery stroke with a large infarct core
This trial will test whether adding endovascular clot removal to standard medical care helps adults with acute basilar artery occlusion who already have a large area of brain damage.
-
Rescue treatment for mild ischemic stroke with basilar artery blockage
This study is testing if combining a new type of treatment with standard care can help people with mild strokes caused by a blocked basilar artery feel better and recover more effectively.
-
Comparing two methods for treating stroke caused by basilar artery blockage
This study is testing two different methods for removing blood clots in the brain to see which one helps adults with stroke caused by a blocked basilar artery recover better.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.