Exploring early radiation treatment for cancer patients before biopsy results
Official title: Is Radiation-before-pathology a Feasible Approach in the Palliative Oncology Setting? A Pragmatic Clinical Trial (RT-NOW)
Run by London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's · NCT06156800 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This study is testing if giving radiation treatment to cancer patients before their biopsy results can be done safely and help reduce wait times for urgent care.
Quick facts
| Study type | Observational |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years and up |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 48 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's Academic / other |
| Drugs / interventions | radiation |
| Locations | 1 site (London, Ontario) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | April 19, 2024 |
| Main results expected | April 1, 2027 |
| Study ends | April 1, 2028 |
| Registry record updated | October 2, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT06156800 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Ideal candidates are adults aged 18 and older with a high likelihood of cancer who require palliative radiation treatment.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients who do not have a high probability of cancer or those whose only biopsy site is also the site requiring radiation may not benefit from this study.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This study investigates the feasibility and safety of administering radiation therapy to cancer patients before obtaining biopsy results. It targets individuals with a high probability of cancer who require urgent treatment, aiming to reduce wait times that could lead to complications. By selecting patients based on clinical judgment and imaging findings, the study seeks to determine if early radiation can be safely implemented without compromising diagnostic outcomes. The approach is particularly relevant in settings with long biopsy wait times, such as Canada.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, this approach could significantly reduce treatment delays for cancer patients, improving their quality of life and potentially their outcomes.
How similar studies have gone: While this approach is innovative, similar studies exploring early intervention in palliative care settings have shown promise, but this specific methodology is relatively novel.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
* Age 18 years or older
* Willing to provide informed consent
* Palliative treatment intent: either metastatic or incurable locally advanced disease
* Tissue diagnosis is not required for determination of dose/fractionation scheme
* Recent cross-sectional imaging \[for example - Computed Tomography (CT), Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography (PET/CT)\] of the area to be treated, done within the past 3 months
* Treating physician considers the pre-test probability of cancer greater than 95 percent based on clinical judgement and radiological findings.
* The patient has at least 1 site of cancer amenable to biopsy
* As per standard practices, if the radiation oncologist will be radiating the only site available to biopsy, they should proceed with caution. Participants should only be enrolled on trial if the risk of harm from delaying Radiation Therapy (RT) significantly outweighs the risks of possible non-diagnostic tissue. If the participant may potentially be eligible for systemic therapy, the treating radiation oncologist should consult a medical oncologist for an opinion regarding the risks of non-diagnostic molecular testing. The weighing of these priorities should be thoroughly discussed with the participant and the discussion should be documented.
* Reasons for radiating a participant with a single lesion prior to biopsy include:
* Spinal cord compression (actual or impending) and inoperable
* Brain metastasis with significant symptoms or neurologic deficits and inoperable
* Other lesions causing neurologic deficit
* Pulmonary lesion causing or threatening lung obstruction
* Uncontrolled bleeding (including hemoptysis and hematuria)
* Superior vena cava obstruction (actual or impending)
* Limited upside to molecular testing, as determined by the medical oncologist (for example - participant unfit for available systemic therapies, limited options for systemic therapy)
* Radiation is considered urgent (for example - participant should receive radiation prior to biopsy date) o Urgent indications may include but are not limited to the reasons listed previously, as well as the following:
* Painful metastases or primary lesion not adequately responding to analgesia
* Symptomatic brain metastases
* Bleeding
* Impending pathologic fracture
Exclusion Criteria:
* Participant is potentially eligible for curative treatment
* Clinical suspicion of lymphoma o Some features may be suggestive of lymphoma, including fever or night sweats (for example - B symptoms excluding weight loss), or imaging showing well-defined, homogenous lymphadenopathy. These findings are not exclusion criteria specifically, but should be considered by the clinician in formulating their differential diagnosis.
Where it's running
-
London Regional Cancer Program, London Health Sciences Centre
London, Ontario, Canada Recruiting
Study contacts
- Principal investigator: David Palma, MD — London Health Sciences Centre, Lawson Health Research Institute
- Study coordinator: David Palma, MD
- Email: David.Palma@lhsc.on.ca
- Phone: 519-685-8650
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Gyrotonic exercise for elders with breast cancer and Behcet disease
We’re testing whether a gyrotonic exercise program helps older people who have both Behcet disease and breast cancer.
-
PECS II vs SPSIP nerve blocks for pain after mastectomy
This study tests whether two ultrasound-guided nerve blocks (PECS II and SPSIP) differ in how much opioid patients need after mastectomy.
-
CG-7321: a first-in-human test in advanced solid tumors
We’re testing CG-7321 alone and with fulvestrant to see if it’s safe and tolerable in adults with advanced solid tumors.
-
Compare a new endoscopy-assisted breast-conserving surgery with the usual approach
This study tests whether a new endoscopy-assisted breast-conserving technique can provide similar or better cosmetic outcomes and safety compared with conventional breast-conserving surgery in women with early breast cancer who want to preserve their breast.
-
Different skin care approaches to prevent skin reactions after mastectomy radiation
This study tests three standard skin care methods to see which best prevents radiation dermatitis in people who had a mastectomy and are receiving post-mastectomy radiation therapy.
-
3D Heart Strain to Detect Early Cardiotoxicity in Cancer Therapy
This study tests whether 3D echocardiography can detect early heart damage from cancer treatments like anthracyclines or HER2-targeted therapy better than standard 2D methods.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.