Endovascular Rescue with Stenting for Large Vessel Occlusion after Partial Clot Removal
Official title: Emergent Large Vessel Occlusion Endovascular Rescue Therapy With Underlying Intracranial Stenosis
Run by ProMedica Health System · NCT07356284 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This trial tests whether adding a stent to the artery after a mechanical thrombectomy helps patients with large vessel stroke who still have significant narrowing in the artery.
Quick facts
| Phase | Phase 3 |
|---|---|
| Study type | Interventional |
| Ages | 18 Years to 80 Years |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 342 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | ProMedica Health System Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Toledo, Ohio) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | May 19, 2026 |
| Main results expected | June 1, 2030 |
| Study ends | June 1, 2030 |
| Registry record updated | May 22, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT07356284 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Adults aged 18-80 with acute ischemic stroke due to ICA or MCA occlusion and residual 70-99% stenosis after initial clot removal, able to be randomized within 24 hours, and with suitable imaging and functional status.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients without significant residual stenosis, with unfavorable imaging, or who cannot be randomized within 24 hours may not benefit from the adjunct stenting strategy.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This phase 3 trial examines the safety and effectiveness of adjunct intracranial stenting performed during mechanical thrombectomy in patients with acute ischemic stroke who have residual stenosis of 70-99% after clot retrieval. Participants receive mechanical thrombectomy plus an additional stenting step, compared to mechanical thrombectomy alone, following device labeling and standard care. Eligible patients are adults up to 80 with anterior circulation occlusions and substantial residual stenosis, able to be randomized within 24 hours and with adequate imaging and functional status. Outcomes will inform whether the rescue-stenting approach improves vessel patency, functional recovery, and safety in this specific subset of stroke patients.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, the approach could improve blood flow restoration and functional outcomes for patients with residual intracranial stenosis after thrombectomy.
How similar studies have gone: Previous thrombectomy trials have explored adjunct procedures, but this specific rescue-stenting approach in the setting of 70-99% residual stenosis after MT is a novel strategy with limited prior success data.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
1. 18 to 80 years of age
2. Presenting with symptoms consistent with AIS
3. Imaging evidence of an anterior occlusion of the Internal Carotid Artery (ICA) or Middle Cerebral Artery Main Stem (MCA M1), or proximal M2 segment AND residual 70-99% stenosis of the index artery following attempted clot retrieval with either aspiration catheters or stent retrievers, per device instructions for use and device labeling
4. NIHSS ≥ 6
5. Ability to randomize within 24 hours of stroke onset.
6. Pre-stroke mRS score 0-2
7. Ability to obtain signed informed consent.
8. ASPECTS Score ≥ 6 by non-contrast CT scan
9. Score-ICAD score of ≥11 points at screening and/or persistent stenotic occlusion of ≥70% after MT
10. If indicated, thrombolytic therapy shall be initiated per the institution's usual care and the most recent version of the AHA/ASA Guidelines. Subjects eligible for IV thrombolysis should receive it without delay.
11. For subjects presenting \>6 hours from stroke onset, infarct core volume \<50 cc quantified by CTP
Exclusion Criteria:
1. Females who are pregnant, or those of child-bearing potential with positive urine or serum beta Human Chorionic Gonadotropin (HCG) test
2. Known severe allergy (more than a rash) to contrast media uncontrolled by medications.
3. CT evidence of the following conditions:
* Midline shift or herniation
* Evidence of intracranial hemorrhage
* Mass effect with effacement of the ventricles
4. Acute bilateral strokes
5. Contraindication to antiplatelet (aspirin, clopidogrel, ticagrelor, cangrelor) or contrast agents
6. Intracranial tumors other than small meningioma, that do not require surgery for at least one year post randomization. Small meningioma is defined as a lesion measuring ≤20mm in maximum diameter or ≤4cm3 in volume, with no associated mass effect, peritumoral edema, or progressive neurological symptoms
7. Known hemorrhagic diathesis, coagulation factor deficiency, or on anticoagulant therapy with an International Normalized Ratio (INR) of \>3.0 or Partial Thromboplastin Time (PTT) \>3 times of normal
8. Baseline platelet count \<80,000 per microliter (µl)
9. Life expectancy less than one year prior to stroke onset
10. Participation in another randomized clinical trial that could confound the evaluation of the study outcomes.
11. Any other condition (in the opinion of the site investigator) that precludes an endovascular procedure or poses a significant hazard to the patient if an endovascular procedure was performed
12. New diagnosis of atrial fibrillation or a history of atrial fibrillation
13. Suspected device-induced vasospasm defined as smooth transient narrowing of the target vessel
14. Vessel dissection including any of the following: presence of dissection flap, false lumen, contrast stagnation in the vessel wall, and/or improving stenosis
\-
Where it's running
-
ProMedica Toledo Hospital
Toledo, Ohio, United States Recruiting
Study contacts
- Principal investigator: Sami Al Kasab, MD — Medical University of South Carolina
- Study coordinator: Sami Al Kasab, MD
- Email: alkasab@musc.edu
- Phone: 4192913498
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Short-Term outside-in nerve stimulation for acute ischemic stroke
This trial tests whether a 5-day external trigeminal nerve stimulation given after stroke can help more patients recover better than a sham treatment.
-
Sevoflurane vs. Propofol for anesthesia in stroke patients undergoing clot-removal
This study tests whether sevoflurane or propofol used for anesthesia during endovascular treatment of an acute ischemic stroke affects the final brain damage and recovery.
-
Safety of adding NRICM301 to standard care for adults with acute ischemic stroke
This study tests whether adding NRICM301, a traditional Chinese medicine formula, to usual care is safe for adults with acute ischemic stroke.
-
Intracranial Recanalization with LT3001 in Acute Ischemic Stroke
This phase II study tests whether LT3001 given to adults with acute ischemic stroke can help reopen blocked brain arteries.
-
Mobilisation After Endovascular Stroke Treatment
This study checks whether moving around 12 hours after endovascular stroke treatment is as safe as moving around 24 hours for people with an acute ischemic stroke.
-
Endovascular therapy plus standard care vs standard care alone for distal and medium vessel strokes
In people with acute ischemic stroke due to distal or medium vessel blockages, this study tests whether adding endovascular treatment to the usual medical care helps improve outcomes compared with medical care alone.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.