Clinical trial Recruiting at 1 site Interventional Ages 30 to 60

Effects of two neck-stretching techniques on pain and movement in people with cervical radicular pain

Official title: Effects of Myokinetic Stretching Technique and Post Facilitation Stretching on Pain, Range of Motion, and Functional Disability in Patients With Cervical Radicular Pain

Run by Lahore University of Biological and Applied Sciences · NCT07724470 · Data updated 2026-11-12

This randomized trial tests whether Myokinetic Stretching Technique or Post Facilitation Stretching better reduces neck-shoulder pain and improves neck movement in people with cervical radicular pain.

More Cervical Radicular Pain trials

Quick facts

Study typeInterventional
Ages30 Years to 60 Years
SexAll
Enrollment40 (estimated)
SponsorLahore University of Biological and Applied Sciences
Academic / other
Locations2 sites (Lahore, Punjab Province and 1 other locations)
StatusRecruiting
StartedJune 29, 2026
Main results expectedJuly 30, 2026
Study endsSeptember 15, 2026
Registry record updatedJuly 24, 2026
Trial IDNCT07724470 on ClinicalTrials.gov

Is this trial a fit for you?

Likely a good fit

Ideal candidates are adults 30–60 with unilateral cervical radicular pain for more than 4 weeks, positive Spurling and upper limb tension tests, and neck disability index under 50%.

Probably not a fit

Patients unlikely to benefit include those with prior cervical spine surgery, severe osteoarthritis, cervical myelopathy, or significant comorbidities.

A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.

What this trial studies

This study compares two stretching approaches for cervical radicular pain in adults aged 30–60. It is a single-blinded, two-arm randomized trial enrolling 70 participants, with 40-70 analyzed per group after randomization and allocation concealment. Participants receive either MST plus conventional therapy or PFS plus conventional therapy, with outcomes including pain intensity, cervical range of motion, and functional disability. The trial uses computer-generated randomization and blinded outcome assessment to minimize bias.

Why it matters

Potential benefit: If MST or PFS proves more effective, patients may experience greater pain relief and improved neck mobility.

How similar studies have gone: There is limited comparative evidence between MST and PFS for cervical radicular pain, making this study relatively novel in this context.

Who can join: the full rules

Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria:

1. Both male and female gender
2. Age 30 to 60 years with a +ve spurling test and radiating arm pain for more than 4 weeks
3. Unilateral cervical radicular pain
4. +ve upper limb tension test and neck disability index \<50%

Exclusion Criteria:

1. History of cervical spinal surgery
2. Severe facet joint osteoarthritis
3. History of fracture in the head and neck region
4. Patient with cognitive dysfunction or mental illness, severe cardiovascular, cerebrovascular, liver, or kidney dysfunction
5. History of dizziness, vertigo, and vomiting
6. Osteoporosis and prolonged use of steroids
7. Cervical myelopathy, tumor, or infectious disease

Where it's running

  • Hameed Latif
    Lahore, Pakistan
    Recruiting
  • Hameed Latif Hospital
    Lahore, Punjab Province, Pakistan
    Not yet recruiting

Study contacts

Similar studies

Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.

How to take part

  1. Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
  2. Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
  3. Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.
Last reviewed 2026-11-14 by the Find a Trial editorial team. Information on this page is for educational purposes and is not medical advice. Always consult qualified healthcare professionals about clinical trial participation.