45 V versus 60 V Pulsed Radiofrequency for Cervical Dorsal Root Ganglion Pain
Official title: Does Higher Voltage Improve Outcomes in Cervical Radicular Pain? A Comparison of 45 V and 60 V Pulsed Radiofrequency of the Cervical Dorsal Root Ganglion
Run by Ankara Etlik City Hospital · NCT07744438 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This study tests whether using 45 V or 60 V during pulsed radiofrequency treatment of the cervical dorsal root ganglion helps reduce neck-nerve pain and improve neck function.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years to 65 Years |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 58 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Ankara Etlik City Hospital Government |
| Locations | 1 site (Ankara) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | July 29, 2026 |
| Main results expected | February 26, 2027 |
| Study ends | March 1, 2027 |
| Registry record updated | August 4, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT07744438 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Ideal candidates have unilateral cervical radicular pain from disc herniation, NRS ≥6, radicular symptoms for ≥3 months, MRI-confirmed nerve compression, and prior incomplete response to conservative care.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients with bilateral pain, additional spinal conditions, prior surgery at the target level, or contraindications to the procedure may not benefit.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
adults with unilateral cervical radicular pain not responding to conservative care will be treated with either 45 V or 60 V pulsed radiofrequency to the cervical dorsal root ganglion. The study will compare pain scores on the Numerical Rating Scale and neck function using the Neck Disability Index, plus track procedure-related safety. The trial aims to clarify which voltage setting provides better pain relief and functional outcomes with acceptable safety. Results may guide parameter choices for PRF in this condition.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If 60 V proves superior, patients could experience greater pain relief and better function with a safe procedure.
How similar studies have gone: Prior research on PRF voltage has mixed findings; this study addresses a gap with direct 45 V versus 60 V comparison in cervical radicular pain.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Unilateral cervical radicular pain consistent with cervical disc herniation. * Pain intensity of ≥6 on the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS). * Radicular pain persisting for at least 3 months. * MRI evidence of lower cervical nerve root compression consistent with clinical findings. * Inadequate response to conservative treatment, including analgesic medications and physical therapy. * Completion of cervical dorsal root ganglion pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) treatment. Exclusion Criteria: * Bilateral upper extremity pain or predominant axial neck pain. * Cervical spinal stenosis, spondylolisthesis, cervical myelopathy, or other structural spinal disorders causing radicular pain. * Previous cervical spine surgery at the target level. * Cognitive impairment preventing reliable outcome assessment. * Active local or systemic infection. * Coagulopathy or inability to discontinue anticoagulant/antiplatelet therapy for the procedure. * Severe hepatic or renal failure. * Pregnancy. * Unstable psychiatric disorders. * Any condition that could interfere with completion of follow-up evaluations.
Where it's running
-
Ankara Etlik City Hospital
Ankara, Turkey (Türkiye) Recruiting
Study contacts
- Principal investigator: Gokhan Yildiz — Ankara Etlik City Hospital
- Study coordinator: Gokhan Yildiz
- Email: gkoyldz@gmail.com
- Phone: 5059272589
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Effects of two neck-stretching techniques on pain and movement in people with cervical radicular pain
This randomized trial tests whether Myokinetic Stretching Technique or Post Facilitation Stretching better reduces neck-shoulder pain and improves neck movement in people with cervical radicular pain.
-
Neuromuscular Re-education for Cervical Radiculopathy
Aims to see if neuromuscular re-education can help reduce neck-related pain, improve movement, and lessen disability for adults with unilateral arm symptoms from cervical radiculopathy.
-
Interlaminar epidural steroid injection for arm position sense in chronic cervical radiculopathy.
We will test whether a single interlaminar epidural steroid injection can improve arm position sense in adults with chronic cervical radiculopathy from a cervical disc herniation.
-
Identifying predictors for effective physiotherapy in neck and arm pain patients
This study is testing whether certain traits can help predict which patients with neck and arm pain will benefit most from manual physiotherapy and nerve exercises.
-
Straight Leg Raise Test: Does it correctly identify nerve root issues?
This study tests how accurately the straight leg raise test detects lumbosacral radicular pain compared with a nerve block reference standard in adults.
-
Safety of a single transforaminal C-1101 injection versus saline for chronic sciatica
This will test whether a single transforaminal epidural injection of C-1101 is safe and well tolerated compared with sterile saline in adults with chronic sciatica who have not improved with conservative care.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.