Clinical trial Recruiting at 1 site Interventional Ages 18 to 50

Effects of Instrument-Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization vs Post Facilitation Stretch in Chronic Neck Pain

Official title: Effects of Instrument-Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization Versus Post Facilitation Stretch Technique in Chronic Neck Pain

Run by Foundation University Islamabad · NCT07887698 · Data updated 2026-11-12

This trial compares two manual therapy techniques, IASTM and Post Facilitation Stretch, to see which better reduces neck pain and improves movement and function in adults with chronic neck pain.

Quick facts

Study typeInterventional
Ages18 Years to 50 Years
SexAll
Enrollment38 (estimated)
SponsorFoundation University Islamabad
Academic / other
Locations1 site (Islamabad, Punjab Province)
StatusRecruiting
StartedFebruary 12, 2026
Main results expectedDecember 18, 2026
Study endsJanuary 18, 2027
Registry record updatedOctober 21, 2026
Trial IDNCT07887698 on ClinicalTrials.gov

Is this trial a fit for you?

Likely a good fit

Adults 18-50 with non-specific chronic neck pain for at least 12 weeks, NPRS ≥ 3, restricted or painful cervical ROM, and moderate to severe neck disability (NDI 15–>35).

Probably not a fit

Patients with a history of cervical surgery, recent cervical trauma, inflammatory or malignant spinal conditions, cervical disc pathology with neurological signs, pregnancy, or skin conditions prohibiting IASTM may not benefit.

A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.

What this trial studies

In this randomized controlled trial, adults aged 18-50 with non-specific chronic neck pain lasting at least 12 weeks are assigned to receive either Instrument-Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization (IASTM) or Post Facilitation Stretch (PFS), in addition to conventional physiotherapy. Outcomes focus on pain intensity, cervical range of motion, and neck-related disability. Forty participants are planned to participate, with random allocation to equal groups, and the study is conducted at Foundation University College of Physical Therapy in Islamabad. The trial tests whether one manual technique provides greater neck pain relief and functional improvement than the other when added to standard therapy.

Why it matters

Potential benefit: If successful, the findings could help clinicians choose the more effective manual therapy approach for reducing pain and improving neck function in chronic neck pain patients.

How similar studies have gone: Manual therapy comparisons exist, but direct head-to-head evidence comparing IASTM and PFS in chronic neck pain is limited, making this study relatively novel.

Who can join: the full rules

Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria:

* Patients aged 18-50 years
* Chronic neck pain ≥ 12 weeks
* Nonspecific neck pain
* NPRS score ≥ 3
* Restricted or painful cervical ROM
* Neck disability score 15- \>35 (moderate to severe disability)

Exclusion criteria:

* History of cervical surgery or recent trauma
* Inflammatory, infectious, or malignant spinal conditions
* Cervical disc pathology with neurological signs
* Pregnancy
* Skin lesions or conditions contraindicating IASTM

Where it's running

  • Foundation University College of Physical Therapy
    Islamabad, Punjab Province, Pakistan
    Recruiting

Study contacts

Similar studies

Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.

How to take part

  1. Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
  2. Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
  3. Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.
Last reviewed 2026-11-14 by the Find a Trial editorial team. Information on this page is for educational purposes and is not medical advice. Always consult qualified healthcare professionals about clinical trial participation.