Dry Dynamic Cupping vs Instrument-Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization for Chronic Myofascial Low Back Pain
Official title: Comparative Effects of Dry Dynamic Cupping and Instrument-Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization in Patients With Chronic Myofascial Low Back Pain
Run by Ibadat International University, Islamabad · NCT07685340 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This trial tests whether dry dynamic cupping or instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization better helps adults with chronic myofascial low back pain who have pain with palpation.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 25 Years to 45 Years |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 48 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Ibadat International University, Islamabad Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Rawalpindi, Punjab Province) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | January 1, 2026 |
| Main results expected | August 15, 2026 |
| Study ends | September 1, 2026 |
| Registry record updated | July 6, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT07685340 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Adults aged 25–45 with chronic (>3 months) myofascial lower back pain confirmed by palpation.
✕Probably not a fit
Individuals outside the age range, with inflammatory/neurological disorders, prior spinal surgery, facet joint issues, discogenic pain, ligamentous pain, pregnancy, or other exclusion criteria may not benefit.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This interventional study compares two physical therapy approaches for chronic myofascial low back pain. Participants will be adults aged 25–45 with long-standing, palpation-confirmed myofascial pain who have not had spinal surgery or inflammatory/neurological conditions. The study examines changes in pain, functional disability, and quality of life after receiving either dry dynamic cupping or instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization. Results may indicate which method provides greater relief and functional improvement. The trial is conducted at Mediplex Healthcare Center in Rawalpindi, sponsored by Ibadat International University, Islamabad.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, participants may experience greater pain relief and improved function with one of the therapies.
How similar studies have gone: Similar approaches have shown varying success; this comparison explores which manual therapy technique may be more effective for this condition.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Chronic Myofascial Lower Back Pain \> 3 months * Pain reproduced by palpation of Lumbar Para-Spinals, Quadratus Lumborum (QL) or Thoracolumbar Fascia. * Trigger Points will be diagnosed through Simons and Travell's Criteria * Age 25-45 years (young adults according to WHO classification) * Both genders Exclusion Criteria: * History of spinal surgery * Presence of inflammatory or neurological disorders * Facet joint dysfunction * Discogenic pain * Ligamentous pain * Pregnant females
Where it's running
-
Mediplex Healthcare Center, Rawalpindi
Rawalpindi, Punjab Province, Pakistan Recruiting
Study contacts
- Principal investigator: Muhammad Ashar Rafi, Dpt, Ms-Nmpt — Ibadat International University
- Study coordinator: Muhammad Ashar Rafi, Dpt, Ms-Nmpt
- Email: ashar.rafi@uipt.iiui.edu.pk
- Phone: 0092-308-3407837
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Lower limb proprioceptive training with core exercises vs. with proprioceptive training alone for balance after stroke
This trial tests whether adding core stability work to lower limb PNF improves balance and mobility in chronic stroke survivors.
-
Effective repositioning maneuvers for dizziness after stroke
This study tests whether the Epley maneuver works better or worse than the Semont maneuver for reducing dizziness and improving balance in stroke survivors with posterior canal BPPV.
-
Pressure vs Visual Biofeedback Training for Forward Head Posture
This study tests whether pressure biofeedback or visual biofeedback training can reduce neck pain and disability in adults with forward head posture.
-
Mulligan Mobilization With Movement for improving ankle movement in type 2 diabetes
This study tests whether Mulligan Mobilization with Movement can improve ankle motion, mobility, pain, and quality of life in people with type 2 diabetes who have limited ankle dorsiflexion.
-
How two hand-held massage methods compare for trapezius neck pain
In adults with trapezius myalgia, this study tests whether instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization (IASTM) or deep transverse friction massage (DTFM) provides better pain relief and function when added to standard physiotherapy.
-
Kaltenborn vs Maitland Mobilization for Cervicogenic Headache
This trial tests whether Kaltenborn mobilization helps people with cervicogenic headache more than Maitland mobilization.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.