Clinical trial Recruiting at 1 site Interventional Ages 0 Days to 28 Days

Dry Cord Care vs Alcohol Cord Care for Healthy Newborns

Official title: Effects of Routine Umbilical Cord Care and Natural Drying Care on Neonatal Infection Rates, Cord Separation Time, and Cost-Effectiveness: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Run by Chang Gung Memorial Hospital · NCT07728058 · Data updated 2026-11-12

This trial tests whether dry cord care or routine alcohol cord care is better for healthy newborns by looking at infection rates in the umbilical cord.

Quick facts

Study typeInterventional
Ages0 Days to 28 Days
SexAll
Enrollment210 (estimated)
SponsorChang Gung Memorial Hospital
Academic / other
Locations1 site (New Taipei City, Taiwan)
StatusRecruiting
StartedJuly 7, 2026
Main results expectedApril 2028
Study endsApril 2028
Registry record updatedJuly 27, 2026
Trial IDNCT07728058 on ClinicalTrials.gov

Is this trial a fit for you?

Likely a good fit

Healthy newborns born at or after 35 weeks gestation, weighing at least 2,300 g, with normal cord appearance at birth.

Probably not a fit

Neonates admitted to NBC/PICU after birth, or those with intrapartum complications or other exclusion criteria, may not benefit.

A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.

What this trial studies

This investigator-initiated, single-center randomized trial compares routine alcohol-based umbilical cord care with natural dry cord care in healthy newborns delivered at New Taipei Municipal TuCheng Hospital. A total of 210 mother-infant pairs will be randomized 1:1 to receive either standard alcohol cord care or dry cord care without topical antiseptics, following usual hygienic practices. The primary outcome is the incidence of umbilical cord infection, with secondary outcomes including cord separation time, bacterial colonization, and health care resources used for cord care. The study addresses a question of global relevance, situating the comparison within the context of existing WHO recommendations and local practice in Taiwan.

Why it matters

Potential benefit: If successful, the trial could clarify whether dry cord care is as safe or safer than alcohol-based care, potentially influencing guidelines and practice.

How similar studies have gone: Previous research has explored dry versus antiseptic cord care with mixed results; this trial adds context within Taiwanese clinical practice.

Who can join: the full rules

Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria:

* Healthy neonates with a gestational age of 35 weeks or greater.
* Birth weight of 2,300 g or greater.
* Normal umbilical cord appearance at birth, with no evidence of trauma, infection, or congenital abnormalities of the umbilical cord.

Exclusion Criteria:

* Neonates born to mothers with intrapartum fever (≥38°C), clinical chorioamnionitis, or rupture of membranes for more than 18 hours
* Meconium-stained amniotic fluid.
* Neonates admitted directly to the Newborn Care Center (NBC) or Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) after birth.
* Neonates from multiple gestations.

Where it's running

  • New Taipei Municipal TuCheng Hospital
    New Taipei City, Taiwan, Taiwan
    Recruiting

Study contacts

Similar studies

Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.

How to take part

  1. Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
  2. Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
  3. Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.
Last reviewed 2026-11-14 by the Find a Trial editorial team. Information on this page is for educational purposes and is not medical advice. Always consult qualified healthcare professionals about clinical trial participation.