Comparison of two approaches for tibial nail surgery
Official title: Comparison of Functional Recovery Following Medial Parapatellar and Transpatellar Approaches for Intramedullary Nailing of Tibial Shaft Fractures
Run by Allama Iqbal Medical College · NCT07761780 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This study tests whether choosing the medial parapatellar or the transpatellar approach during intramedullary nailing leads to better recovery for adults with tibial shaft fractures.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years to 60 Years |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 56 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Allama Iqbal Medical College Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Lahore, Punjab Province) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | August 8, 2026 |
| Main results expected | October 8, 2026 |
| Study ends | October 10, 2026 |
| Registry record updated | August 14, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT07761780 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Adults aged 18–60 with acute tibial shaft fractures (Gustilo-Anderson I–IIIA) eligible for intramedullary nailing and able to consent.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients with osteoporosis, significant systemic conditions, prior tibia surgery, or neurovascular injury may have limited benefit.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This randomized trial compares two surgical approaches for intramedullary nailing of tibial shaft fractures. Adults aged 18 to 60 with acute tibial shaft fractures are assigned to either the medial parapatellar or the transpatellar approach, with all procedures performed by experienced orthopedic surgeons. Primary outcome is functional recovery measured by the Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS); secondary outcomes include postoperative pain and knee motion. The study aims to determine if one approach yields superior knee function and overall recovery after surgery. Participants are followed under standardized operative and postoperative protocols at a single center in Lahore, Pakistan.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, the study could clarify which surgical approach supports faster or more complete knee and leg recovery after tibial nailing.
How similar studies have gone: Previous comparative studies have shown mixed results; this trial provides a direct, randomized comparison in a defined patient group.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Adults aged 18 to 60 years, irrespective of sex. * Patients with an acute tibial shaft fracture confirmed by radiographic examination. * Gustilo-Anderson type I, II, or IIIA open fractures. * Patients who are eligible for intramedullary interlocking nailing according to the treating orthopedic surgeon. * Patients willing and able to provide written informed consent. Exclusion Criteria: * Previous fracture or surgery involving the affected tibia. * Osteoporosis or other conditions significantly affecting bone healing. * Diabetes mellitus, peripheral vascular disease, autoimmune disorders, or other systemic conditions that may adversely affect bone healing or postoperative recovery. * Neurovascular injury involving the affected limb.
Where it's running
-
Jinnah Hospital Lahore
Lahore, Punjab Province, Pakistan Recruiting
Study contacts
- Principal investigator: Prof. Sajjad Hussain — Aimc
- Study coordinator: Prof. Sajjad Hussain
- Email: prof.sajjadhussain@aimc.edu.pk
- Phone: 0333 4077389
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Monitoring leg pressure in teens with tibia fractures
A sensor is placed during surgery to see if measuring anterior leg pressure can help doctors spot acute compartment syndrome in teens with tibia fractures.
-
Carbon footprint comparison of surgery versus non-surgical care for metacarpal shaft fractures
This study will test whether surgery or non-surgical care for adults with metacarpal shaft fractures produces more carbon emissions over the year after injury.
-
Metacarpal shaft fractures: operative fixation versus immediate unrestricted mobilization
It tests whether immediate unrestricted mobilization (no surgery) provides similar one-year outcomes to operative fixation for adults with displaced spiral or oblique metacarpal shaft fractures.
-
Robot-assisted closed reduction for femoral shaft fractures
This study tests whether robot-assisted closed reduction leads to better fracture alignment and recovery than conventional reduction in adults with unilateral, acute femoral shaft fractures.
-
Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Humeral Midshaft Fracture: Anterior vs Posterior Plate Fixation
Doctors will test whether fixing the middle part of the upper arm bone with an anterior plate or a posterior plate works better for adults with a humeral midshaft fracture.
-
Robot-assisted closed reduction and internal fixation for distal tibial fractures
This study tests whether an intelligent robot system can improve alignment and safety for patients with extra-articular distal tibia fractures compared with the usual surgeon-led reduction.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.