Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Humeral Midshaft Fracture: Anterior vs Posterior Plate Fixation
Official title: Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Humeral Midshaft Fracture: Anterior Versus Posterior Plate Fixation
Run by Sahiwal Teaching Hospital · NCT07775690 · Data updated 2026-11-12
Doctors will test whether fixing the middle part of the upper arm bone with an anterior plate or a posterior plate works better for adults with a humeral midshaft fracture.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 16 Years to 65 Years |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 150 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Sahiwal Teaching Hospital Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Sāhīwāl, Punjab Province) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | February 17, 2026 |
| Main results expected | August 17, 2026 |
| Study ends | August 17, 2026 |
| Registry record updated | August 20, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT07775690 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Adults with a midshaft humerus fracture suitable for ORIF who do not have open fractures, neurovascular complications, or prior surgery on the affected arm.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients with complex injuries, significant elbow/shoulder pathology, dementia or other disqualifying conditions, or fractures outside the midshaft may not benefit.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This interventional study compares two surgical approaches for ORIF of humeral midshaft fractures: an anterior plate fixation and a posterior plate fixation. Eligible participants have a midshaft humerus fracture and meet specific clinical criteria, with exclusions for open or pathological fractures, prior surgery on the same arm, and other complicating injuries. Outcomes will inform which approach yields better healing and function while considering surgical requirements like patient position during the operation. The study is conducted at Sahiwal Teaching Hospital under the leadership of Dr. Jahanzaib Ramay and collaborators. Evidence from this trial could guide surgeons on the preferred approach for these injuries.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, the trial could clarify which fixation approach provides better healing and arm function after humeral midshaft fractures.
How similar studies have gone: Previous surgical approaches for humeral shaft fractures have shown mixed results; this trial seeks direct comparative data for anterior versus posterior plate fixation.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Presenting with humeral midshaft fracture (presence of fracture in the middle part or center of humerus ) Exclusion Criteria: * Patients with pathological or open fractures, concomitant fractures or ligament or tendon ruptures of elbow or shoulder joints (on clinical examination) * Patients presented after 14 days of injury, partial or complete disability of the elbow or shoulder joint on the affected side before injury * Previous surgical procedure on same side * Presence of neurovascular complications * Apparent dementia or other psychological problems
Where it's running
-
Sahiwal Teaching Hospital
Sāhīwāl, Punjab Province, Pakistan Recruiting
Study contacts
- Study coordinator: Dr Jahanzaib Ramay, MBBS
- Email: jahanzaibramay@hotmail.com
- Phone: +923317787687
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Comparing unipolar and bipolar interlocking techniques for humeral shaft fractures
This study is testing whether two different surgical techniques for fixing arm fractures work better than each other in helping adults heal and avoid complications.
-
Carbon footprint comparison of surgery versus non-surgical care for metacarpal shaft fractures
This study will test whether surgery or non-surgical care for adults with metacarpal shaft fractures produces more carbon emissions over the year after injury.
-
Metacarpal shaft fractures: operative fixation versus immediate unrestricted mobilization
It tests whether immediate unrestricted mobilization (no surgery) provides similar one-year outcomes to operative fixation for adults with displaced spiral or oblique metacarpal shaft fractures.
-
Robot-assisted closed reduction for femoral shaft fractures
This study tests whether robot-assisted closed reduction leads to better fracture alignment and recovery than conventional reduction in adults with unilateral, acute femoral shaft fractures.
-
Comparison of two approaches for tibial nail surgery
This study tests whether choosing the medial parapatellar or the transpatellar approach during intramedullary nailing leads to better recovery for adults with tibial shaft fractures.
-
Pain control for children with lateral condyle fractures
This study tests if a special pain relief method called an infraclavicular nerve block can help children with arm fractures feel less pain after surgery compared to regular care.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.