Clinical trial Recruiting at 1 site Interventional Ages 18 and up

Comparing two ventilation modes to reduce diaphragm atrophy in intubated patients

Official title: A Phase III Randomized Trial Comparing the Effects of Volume Support and Assist Control Mode Ventilation on Ventilator-Free Days and Diaphragmatic Atrophy

Run by University of Chicago · NCT03901924 · Data updated 2026-11-12

This study is testing if using a different breathing support method can help intubated patients avoid diaphragm problems and spend less time on a ventilator.

Quick facts

Study typeInterventional
Ages18 Years and up
SexAll
Enrollment468 (estimated)
SponsorUniversity of Chicago
Academic / other
Locations2 sites (Chicago, Illinois and 1 other locations)
StatusRecruiting
StartedMarch 4, 2019
Main results expectedMay 2027
Study endsMay 2027
Registry record updatedJuly 13, 2026
Trial IDNCT03901924 on ClinicalTrials.gov

Is this trial a fit for you?

Likely a good fit

Ideal candidates are adults over 18 years old who have been intubated and mechanically ventilated for less than 36 hours.

Probably not a fit

Patients with a history of diaphragmatic paralysis, neuromuscular disease, or those expected to be liberated from the ventilator in less than 24 hours may not benefit from this study.

A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.

What this trial studies

This study aims to evaluate the effects of volume support mode versus assist control mode ventilation on ventilator-free days and diaphragmatic atrophy in patients who have been intubated for less than 36 hours. It focuses on the complications associated with ventilator-induced diaphragmatic dysfunction (VIDD), which can lead to prolonged ICU stays and increased reintubation rates. The hypothesis is that early initiation of support mode ventilation will result in fewer complications and less diaphragmatic atrophy compared to controlled mode ventilation. The study will involve a randomized trial design to compare these two ventilation strategies.

Why it matters

Potential benefit: If successful, this study could lead to improved recovery outcomes for patients requiring mechanical ventilation by reducing diaphragmatic atrophy.

How similar studies have gone: Observational studies suggest that different ventilation modes can impact diaphragmatic atrophy, but this specific approach is novel and has not been extensively tested.

Who can join: the full rules

Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria:

subjects \> 18 years of age that have been intubated and mechanically ventilated for \< 36 hours at the time of screening will be eligible for enrollment

Exclusion Criteria:

1. pregnancy
2. cardiopulmonary arrest
3. history of diaphragmatic paralysis or neuromuscular disease
4. chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) or asthma exacerbation with evidence of auto-PEEPing requiring intubation
5. neuromuscular blockade
6. expectation to be liberated from ventilator in \< 24 hours
7. history of mechanical ventilation in the last 6 months
8. presence of tracheostomy
9. high cervical spine injury

Where it's running

  • The University of Chicago Medical Center
    Chicago, Illinois, United States
    Recruiting
  • University of Iowa
    Iowa City, Iowa, United States
    Not yet recruiting

Study contacts

Similar studies

Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.

How to take part

  1. Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
  2. Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
  3. Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.
Last reviewed 2026-11-14 by the Find a Trial editorial team. Information on this page is for educational purposes and is not medical advice. Always consult qualified healthcare professionals about clinical trial participation.