Comparing two surgical techniques for rectal cancer treatment
Official title: Postoperative and Long-term Outcomes of Transanal Tran-section and Single-stapled Anastomosis (TTSS) in Rectal Can-cer Patients: a Multicentric International IDEAL Stage 2b Prospective Parallel Cohort Study
Run by Istituto Clinico Humanitas · NCT06314646 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This study is testing a new surgical technique for rectal cancer to see if it can lead to fewer complications compared to the traditional method for patients having surgery.
Quick facts
| Study type | Observational |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years and up |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 472 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Istituto Clinico Humanitas Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Rozzano, MI) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | March 26, 2024 |
| Main results expected | May 31, 2027 |
| Study ends | December 31, 2027 |
| Registry record updated | June 27, 2024 |
| Trial ID | NCT06314646 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Ideal candidates are adults diagnosed with rectal cancer who are scheduled for elective rectal resection with either TTSS or double-stapled techniques.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients requiring abdominoperineal resection or those with concurrent invasive pelvic malignant tumors may not benefit from this study.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This study evaluates the Transanal Transection and Single-Stapled anastomosis (TTSS) technique as an alternative to the traditional double-stapled anastomosis in patients undergoing surgery for low rectal cancer. It aims to compare postoperative and functional outcomes between these two surgical approaches. By expanding data collection to multiple countries, the study seeks to provide robust prospective data to confirm previous findings that suggested TTSS may reduce anastomotic leaks. The research involves adult patients scheduled for elective rectal resection with Total Mesorectal Excision (TME).
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, this study could lead to improved surgical outcomes and reduced complications for rectal cancer patients.
How similar studies have gone: Previous studies have suggested the TTSS technique may be advantageous, but this study aims to provide more comprehensive prospective data to validate those findings.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Adult (≥ 18 years old) patients, men and women, diagnosed with rectal cancer scheduled for elective rectal resection with Total Mesorectal Excision (TME) with double-stapled or Transanal Transection and Single-Stapled anastomosis (TTSS) approaches. * Patients scheduled for open, laparoscopic, or robotic surgery. * Patients preoperatively indicated for sphincter-saving procedures with or without protective-stoma. Exclusion Criteria: * Immediate or delayed hand-sewn coloanal anastomosis. * Patients requiring abdominoperineal resection (APR). Patients undergoing unplanned non-reconstructive surgery will be withdrawn from the study. * Patients with concurrent or previous invasive pelvic malignant tumors. Patients with an intraoperative evidence of invasive pelvic malignant tumors will be withdrawn from the study.
Where it's running
-
IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital
Rozzano, Mi, Italy Recruiting
Study contacts
- Principal investigator: Antonino Spinelli, MD, PhD — IRCCS Huamanitas Research Hospital
- Study coordinator: Annalisa Maroli, PhD
- Email: colorapp@humanitas.it
- Phone: 02 8224 7776
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Single vs. double stapling and purse-string techniques after rectal cancer surgery
This trial tests whether using a single-stapling method to join the bowel after rectal cancer surgery results in fewer leaks compared with the double-stapling method.
-
DEM301 in advanced colorectal cancer: a first-in-human test
This first-in-human Phase 1 study tests DEM301 in adults with advanced metastatic colorectal cancer to see if it is safe, how it behaves in the body, and whether it shows any signs of activity.
-
Rectal cancer registry to track real-world treatments and outcomes
This registry collects real-world data on how locally advanced rectal cancer is treated in Austria, to see how TNT and dMMR/MSI-H cases are managed and what outcomes occur.
-
Aerobic exercise and guided imagery for bowel problems after rectal cancer surgery
This study tests whether a program of aerobic exercise plus guided imagery helps people with low anterior resection syndrome after rectal cancer surgery.
-
Active surveillance vs chemoradiotherapy after local removal of intermediate-risk T1 rectal cancer
This study tests whether close follow-up alone after local removal of early rectal cancer can match the cancer control of adding chemoradiotherapy, while reducing treatment-related side effects.
-
Different-Dose Short-Course Radiotherapy With CAPOX, PD-1 Blockade, and IL-2 in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer
This phase II trial tests whether a low-dose short-course radiotherapy combined with CAPOX, a PD-1 blocker, and IL-2 works as well as the standard-dose short-course approach in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.